hydrophilic attack
Member
People laughed at my math skills. People called me a joke poster and a fanboy.
But clearly, the insider agrees with me that The One is superior.
Pack it up Sony
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Virtual testing of PS4 and XBO GPUs prove PS4 has bigger grafix numbers
- Thread starter GoofsterStud
- Start date
- Status
People laughed at my math skills. People called me a joke poster and a fanboy.
But clearly, the insider agrees with me that The One is superior.
Pack it up Sony
misterLOLmedia never surrenders.
I'm sorry, but that's just not the case. In essentially every way, the PS4's hardware is more powerful than the XBO's.
hydrophilic attack said:
I knew someone was going to do that.
I'm glad it was you.
You clearly don't know who you're talking to.
scoobs
Member
Again, not saying it isn't. Just saying its the only area where its at least interesting to discuss the implications of the eSRAM. That is all I'm saying. Sorry for confusion
scoobs
Member
Please tell me all about this gab.
It began with a secret sauce...
scoobs
Member
"The gab is wider than you think"
Now that's just rude. haha
Rui Unas, he's a portuguese comedian.
I'm amazed people still think the Xbone is the same or more powerful than PS4.
This isn't a 360, PS4 situation were one is better on paper but will prove itself.
MS spent their budget on different priorities so it is up to them to show that their priorities are the ones that matter. By offering Xbone without kinect they have already failed.
This isn't a 360, PS4 situation were one is better on paper but will prove itself.
MS spent their budget on different priorities so it is up to them to show that their priorities are the ones that matter. By offering Xbone without kinect they have already failed.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
It makes me sad that MS went the way they did with the One. It makes me even sadder that I ended up buying a One, even though I prefer the 4, because I literally only know 1 person with a 4 and over 20 with a One
I wonder if your 20 friends fell the same way, but everyone just sort follows each other.
scoobs
Member
Indeed, but people still like arguing ... for funsies
El-Pistolero
Member
I know you are under NDA, Matt, but there was talk about the eSRAM being much more capable than initially thought. Could not that bandwidth help the One bridge the gap, at least in terms of memory capabilities, if only a little..?
travisbickle
Member
When devs ditch last gen development, then we will see what these gpus are capable of.
I think it's more fun arguing over comparisons between PS4 and mid-range GPUs instead; it's less one-sided.
Horse Armour
Member
PS4 is nowhere near a 7870, it's far closer to the XB1 GPU than the 7870.
It makes me sad that MS went the way they did with the One. It makes me even sadder that I ended up buying a One, even though I prefer the 4, because I literally only know 1 person with a 4 and over 20 with a One
Pretty, pretty, pretty good
humblebrag
Satirising meaningless corporate jargon does not make one a member of either defence force.
It was settled a long time ago with the specs and architecture.
Monty Mole
Member
Yea according to the graph i would say the gap between PS4 to 7870 is almost the same as XB1 to PS4 which is surprising cause i remember people said PS4 is almost 7870 in terms of power.
MS taking Sony's lunch in folding@home confirmed
BladeoftheImmortal
Member
no shit.
No people were saying it was a 7850. The difference between the 50 and 70 is pretty decent.
IAmRandom31
Banned
people advocating for eSRAM fail to mention the theoretical peak of the eSRAM of 200GB/s r/w is like 15% higher then the 176GB/s of the GDDR5 of the PS4. Except the PS4 has 200+x more capacity of RAM with that sort of bandwidth.
I couldn't think of any scenarios where a developer would seriously think that sort of speed increase is worth working with 200x less memory.
Anyway why do we need these sort of benchmarks? The games themselves could easily be benchmarks, to a degree.
I couldn't think of any scenarios where a developer would seriously think that sort of speed increase is worth working with 200x less memory.
Anyway why do we need these sort of benchmarks? The games themselves could easily be benchmarks, to a degree.
JonathanPower
Member
I want to play Titanfall on her.
SneakyStephan
Banned
gaming_noob
Member
I know it's common knowledge by now but it still shocks me every time I see these facts. I never expected MS to have hardware this weak...
You're acting like Sony just grabbed a 7850 off the shelf and used it for the PS4. It's custom designed and has advantages.
IAmRandom31
Banned
Show me a PC 7850 that can duplicate that @ 60fps
consoles have always been able to do much more with much weaker on paper hardware.
GhostTrick
Banned
Show me a PC 7850 that can duplicate that @ 60fps
consoles have always been able to do much more with much weaker on paper hardware.
Shouldn't we wait to see if we'll see that ingame ?
Because I'm tired of the "in-engine recorded on the console" thing.
Show me a PC 7850 that can duplicate that @ 60fps
consoles have always been able to do much more with much weaker on paper hardware.
We can't really know if a 7850 could do that because the game is locked to a console. And it's simply a case of a game being made for modern hardware anyway, instead of 8 year old hardware; there's gonna be a jump in graphics. I would like to be lead to the comparable games though that are doing much more with weaker on paper specs.
jim-jam bongs
Member
The Janitor
Member
Show me a PC 7850 that can duplicate that @ 60fps
consoles have always been able to do much more with much weaker on paper hardware.
That's impossible to compare because uncharted isn't on PC. You have to compare multiplats in that case.
Dictator93
Member
Show me a PC 7850 that can duplicate that @ 60fps
consoles have always been able to do much more with much weaker on paper hardware.
This post is sooooo bad for so many reasons.
Wanting to compare an unproven tech demo of an exclusive to a PC game?
SURE
jim-jam bongs
Member
DJKippling
Banned
I have both a ps4 and Xbox One and i haven't really noticed a difference either having tried both versions of some games such as Watchdogs.
Until they change the controller or the UI and other things, I will pick up the Xbox version every time. Just cant stand the PlayStation Eco system. *shrugs*
*these are my opinions and I'm not saying other people who prefer PS4 are wrong.
Dictator93
Member
I don't think this is how math works...
28/42 -> 2/3 -> 66% which means the Xbone has 66% of the Power of the PS4, which means, that the PS4 is 33% more powerful. (of course only considering these theoretically numbers "28" & "42")
Or to make it even bigger: 42/28 -> 1.5 which means the PS4 is 1.5 times more powerful as the Xbone.
IF 42 and 28 are percentages on a scale to 100. Even then your math is wrong. becaus the 14% difference wouldn't be in relation to each other, but in relation to the end of the scale (100), in which the PS4 is 14 points "closer" to it.
or.. I've overseen something and totally calculated it wrong, so feel free to correct me
GifGafIsTheBestGaf
Member
i dont know what i expected of the comments section in there, it's like when you wake up and somebody forgot to flush the toilet in the morning
it was an interesting read anyway
it was an interesting read anyway
- Status
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll