I'm surprised people still give commentary on the engine, I'm guessing none of you play source games regularly? It doesn't really look like shit when you're playing on your monitor, from my perspective anyway.DefectiveReject said:i have a PS3 and therefore feel justified. but this looks like shit but in HD
well said.Bidermaier said:the graphics look out of date. The gameplay looks timeless
You're not the only one. I was thinking to myself that it seems to have gotten a serious bump in quality. I guess I've been watching too many youtube sized videos so the game always looked terrible to me.Mistouze said:I must be the only one thinking the Source Engine still does a classy job.
Anyway I'm so hot for this game, lots of fun to be had with gaffers.
:lol And the guy's name is Flo.Haunted said:http://i36.tinypic.com/70jsix.jpg
Dying guy on the left looks so photoshopped, the perspective's so wrong. :lol
Also, Uwe is a woman!?
Draft said:X360 version? Looks poor.
Should have turned down the res and cranked the AA then. And the AF. And the texture quality.BeeDog said:Resolution is above 720p, so probably the PC version.
Good job, though I think the game looks just fine when it's in motion (from a visual standpoint)Bidermaier said:the graphics look out of date. The gameplay looks timeless
Source always fucks up the perspective on objects to the edge of your screen. It's maddening, to be honest...especially since you're the first person I've EVER heard comment on it (at least I'm not alone)Haunted said:http://i36.tinypic.com/70jsix.jpg
Dying guy on the left looks so photoshopped, the perspective's all wrong. :lol
I think it has more to do with a wide FOV than Source specifically. I've noticed the same thing in other games, but only in widescreen.Gattsu25 said:Source always fucks up the perspective on objects to the edge of your screen. It's maddening, to be honest...especially since you're the first person I've EVER heard comment on it (at least I'm not alone)
Draft said:X360 version? Looks poor.
It's not just source. Still, it doesn't explain why he looks like he's floating. Not that I care, at all.Gattsu25 said:Source always fucks up the perspective on objects to the edge of your screen. It's maddening, to be honest...especially since you're the first person I've EVER heard comment on it (at least I'm not alone)
There are reports of a demo, isnt there?Dabanton said:Valve i have your money here for L4D. Let us pre order on Steam and give us a little taste please a weekend beta anything. :lol
Happy zombie wants a hug?
GavinGT said:With the exception of the main character models, the graphics are very underwhelming. Nonetheless, this is going to be fun as hell.
phez said:Honestly, where the hell does G4 get all these monies from?
DefectiveReject said:i have a PS3 and therefore feel justified. but this looks like shit but in HD
Raide said:"Hey Roman, I want zombie teeeties."
I just hope Vavle show this as much love as TF2 is getting.
ciaossu said:The Source engine is starting to look really dated. I'll still be buying this, but I can't wait for the next Valve engine.
No doubt Left 4 Dead will look great on PC and console alike. The videos already show that so I'm not sure why people feel the need to complain after one 'poor' batch of screenshots.Pyrokai said:I look at statements like this and can't help but notice that I never even think of things like this. Maybe I'm just not spoiled when it comes to graphics, but I still think this looks gorgeous. Half-Life 2 is still currently one of the most beautiful games I've ever played.