eznark
john deere tramp stamp
(08-20-2008, 01:27 AM)

eznark's Avatar
#1601

Originally Posted by eastside49er:
GI also gave it a 7 (well the 2nd reviewer did).
I didn't want to push decent and get flamed.

EDIT: see. (you should read the giantbomb review, certainly sounds like they thought it was decent)
Farnack
Banned
(08-20-2008, 01:27 AM)
#1602

Originally Posted by eznark:
Ign, Giant Bomb, G4 gave it "decent" reviews.
Giant Bomb 3/5 = 6/10 is decent?
Polari
(08-20-2008, 01:29 AM)

Polari's Avatar
#1603

Originally Posted by Farnack:
Giant Bomb 3/5 = 6/10 is decent?
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Zeliard
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:30 AM)

Zeliard's Avatar
#1604

Originally Posted by Farnack:
Giant Bomb 3/5 = 6/10 is decent?
You can't really compare it like that. 3 is two points away from a perfect score on a 5-point scale, while 6 is four points away on a 10-point scale. Both give you the same percentages but the scales are completely different.
eastside49er
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:30 AM)

eastside49er's Avatar
#1605

Originally Posted by eznark:
I didn't want to push decent and get flamed.
A 7 = good game on the majority of web sites and gaming mags. I would say that is more than decent in their eyes.

Out of all the reviews I have read for the game, GS's is by far the weirdest. They really just disliked the game. Then again, GS hasn't been taken seriously for nearly 2 years now by me considering all of the people who could actually review games left or got fired.
Segata Sanshiro
(08-20-2008, 01:30 AM)
#1606

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Since... since ratios were invented?
sillymonkey321
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:30 AM)

sillymonkey321's Avatar
#1607

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?

Since we don't want 3/5 to be decent which it is.
Farnack
Banned
(08-20-2008, 01:32 AM)
#1608

Originally Posted by Zeliard:
You can't really compare it like that. 3 is two points away from a perfect score on a 5-point scale, while 6 is four points away on a 10-point scale. Both give you the same percentages but the scales are completely different.
So I guess Gamespy's 2.5/5 is more decent than Gamespots 5.5/10 since it's only 2.5 away from a perfect score. ~roll eyes~
Big-E
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:33 AM)

Big-E's Avatar
#1609

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
:lol
Jtyettis
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:33 AM)

Jtyettis's Avatar
#1610

Originally Posted by eznark:
Ign, Giant Bomb, G4 gave it "decent" reviews.
Gamepro's was pretty positive with an 8, well 4/5, as well. Ars Techina's writeup was fairly good too.
WrikaWrek
Banned
(08-20-2008, 01:34 AM)

WrikaWrek's Avatar
#1611

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Think about it.
Meta-Knight
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:35 AM)
#1612

Originally Posted by Farnack:
Giant Bomb 3/5 = 6/10 is decent?
Originally Posted by 3/5 according to Giant Bomb:
The halfway point. An inherent appreciation of this game's specific gameplay style, characters, subject matter, and so on may play as big a role in your enjoyment as the actual quality of the game.
That kinda means decent to me...
sullyj
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:36 AM)
#1613

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Zeliard
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:36 AM)

Zeliard's Avatar
#1614

Originally Posted by Farnack:
So I guess Gamespy's 2.5/5 is more decent than Gamespots 5.5/10 since it's only 2.5 away from a perfect score. ~roll eyes~
I'm talking about the scales. You can't convert a 5-point scale to a 10-point scale while having it mean the same thing. The only reason sites like Gamerankings and Metacritic do that is because they have to for the purposes of averaging out all scores on the same scale.
eznark
john deere tramp stamp
(08-20-2008, 01:36 AM)

eznark's Avatar
#1615

Originally Posted by Meta-Knight:
That kinda means decent to me...
actually "inherrant appreciation" means BURN IT WITH FIRE!!
Segata Sanshiro
(08-20-2008, 01:42 AM)
#1616

Originally Posted by Zeliard:
I'm talking about the scales. You can't convert a 5-point scale to a 10-point scale while having it mean the same thing. The only reason sites like Gamerankings and Metacritic do that is because they have to for the purposes of averaging out all scores on the same scale.
That's definitely true, and the same goes for letter grades. If you think about it, it ends up almost completely invalidating what sites like gamerankings and metacritic do.
Kingpen
Crosby. Malkin. Fleury.
Stanley Cup Champeens
(08-20-2008, 01:42 AM)
#1617

Originally Posted by Slurmer:
"Xplay 4/5"

Seems they liked it, but I know they've been looking forward to it for a while now. Adam was all about it back when Xplay had their "Too Human" week or whatever it was.
This Xplay review, combined with some insider impressions I have heard have saved the game for me, and I will pick it up tomorrow. I respect Sessler's opinion, (just don't really care for M. Webb) I waivered after hearing the bomb reviews drop, but I realize that I did enjoy the demo, and I can really get into loot drop games. I put 40 hours into Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, and it would have been more if they had not put out a 'fun-sapping' patch for the game and basically ruined it.

I've heard Too Human is certainly better then KUF: COD, so I will take that advice and pick it up. Besides, if it is absolutely terrible, I'll chock it up as a slightly more expensive rental and trade it in toward Sacred 2.
Downpour
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:43 AM)
#1618

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Exactly. Let's give this man a tag.

Polari
It's The New Math
Segata Sanshiro
(08-20-2008, 01:45 AM)
#1619

Originally Posted by Kingpen:
This Xplay review, combined with some insider impressions I have heard have saved the game for me, and I will pick it up tomorrow. I respect Sessler's opinion, (just don't really care for M. Webb) I waivered after hearing the bomb reviews drop, but I realize that I did enjoy the demo, and I can really get into loot drop games. I put 40 hours into Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, and it would have been more if they had not put out a 'fun-sapping' patch for the game and basically ruined it.

I've heard Too Human is certainly better then KUF: COD, so I will take that advice and pick it up. Besides, if it is absolutely terrible, I'll chock it up as a slightly more expensive rental and trade it in toward Sacred 2.
You know that the Xplay reviews aren't written by Adam or Morgan most of the time, right? They just take turns reading reviews written from the same pool of writers.
eznark
john deere tramp stamp
(08-20-2008, 01:45 AM)

eznark's Avatar
#1620

Originally Posted by Downpour:
Exactly. Let's give this man a tag.

Polari
It's The New Math
actually, Giant Bomb's 3 stars don't equal 60%, but knowing that would require reading.
Segata Sanshiro
(08-20-2008, 01:47 AM)
#1621

Originally Posted by eznark:
actually, Giant Bomb's 3 stars don't equal 60%, but knowing that would require reading.
It's not what he said that people are laughing at, it's *how* he said it.
Amir0x
demodded, not denutted
(08-20-2008, 01:48 AM)

Amir0x's Avatar
#1622

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Philthy
Member
(08-20-2008, 01:55 AM)

Philthy's Avatar
#1623

Originally Posted by Segata Sanshiro:
You know that the Xplay reviews aren't written by Adam or Morgan most of the time, right? They just take turns reading reviews written from the same pool of writers.
Adam wrote this one. He's been playing it for two and a half weeks and still loves the shit out of it.

http://www.g4tv.com/xplay/reviews/1823/Too_Human.html
Last edited by Philthy; 08-20-2008 at 02:00 AM.
DeadGzuz
Banned
(08-20-2008, 02:01 AM)
#1624

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Since the dawn of mathematics?

Let me guess, you were home schooled and Evolution is "just a theory"?
CoG
Member
(08-20-2008, 02:02 AM)
#1625

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
It translates to 60 at Metacritic same as 6/10 so at the end of the day that's all that really matters.
Operations
Member
(08-20-2008, 02:08 AM)
#1626

Originally Posted by DeadGzuz:
Since the dawn of mathematics?

Let me guess, you were home schooled and Evolution is "just a theory"?
Damn, you guys are brutal :lol
NolbertoS
Member
(08-20-2008, 02:41 AM)

NolbertoS's Avatar
#1627

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
3/5 = 6/10 = 9/15 = 12/20 = 15/25. etc.....which takes up back to 3/5, junior.
Kittonwy
Banned
(08-20-2008, 02:44 AM)
#1628

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
Danthrax
Batteries the CRISIS!
(08-20-2008, 02:44 AM)

Danthrax's Avatar
#1629

Originally Posted by NolbertoS:
3/5 = 6/10 = 9/15 = 12/20 = 15/25. etc.....which takes up back to 3/5, junior.
He's not a junior

But I second the motion that he receive a tag for meritorious conduct in doing the maths :lol
Father_Brain
Samus made me a Widower :(
(08-20-2008, 02:45 AM)

Father_Brain's Avatar
#1630


:lol
Polari
(08-20-2008, 02:48 AM)

Polari's Avatar
#1631

On a review scale, dumbasses.

Look I'm as big Dyack/Too Human hater as the rest of you, but don't be so fucking stupid. There's enough bad reviews out there, leave the grasping at straws to Denis.
Polari
(08-20-2008, 02:49 AM)

Polari's Avatar
#1632

Originally Posted by NolbertoS:
3/5 = 6/10 = 9/15 = 12/20 = 15/25. etc.....which takes up back to 3/5, junior.
Been on this forum a lot longer than you, pal.
Farnack
Banned
(08-20-2008, 02:52 AM)
#1633

Originally Posted by Polari:
On a review scale, dumbasses.

Look I'm as big Dyack/Too Human hater as the rest of you, but don't be so fucking stupid. There's enough bad reviews out there, leave the grasping at straws to Denis.
So tell me, what's 3/5 and what's 2.5/5 for metacritic?

Because the .5 difference from Giant Bomb's "decent" to Gamespy's "burn this game if you see it" shouldn't be that far.
Slurmer
Member
(08-20-2008, 02:54 AM)

Slurmer's Avatar
#1634

Originally Posted by Father_Brain:
http://g.photos.cx/cv0056small-6d.jpg
:lol

:lol :lol :lol oh god that is the best in a long time
Polari
(08-20-2008, 02:55 AM)

Polari's Avatar
#1635

Originally Posted by Farnack:
So tell me, what's 3/5 and what's 2.5/5 for metacritic?

Because the .5 difference from Giant Bomb's "decent" to Gamespy's "burn this game if you see it" shouldn't be that far.
Agreed. My point is review scores don't scale. Of course, make a point that might possibly be construed as being in favour of Too Human in this thread and everyone has a field day. Idiots.
Danthrax
Batteries the CRISIS!
(08-20-2008, 02:58 AM)

Danthrax's Avatar
#1636

Originally Posted by Father_Brain:

:lol
I want to laugh, but I just don't get who threw the number 4 or why the ship is burning.
Dirtbag
what would Breesus do?
(08-20-2008, 03:02 AM)

Dirtbag's Avatar
#1637

Originally Posted by Polari:
Agreed. My point is review scores don't scale. Of course, make a point that might possibly be construed as being in favour of Too Human in this thread and everyone has a field day. Idiots.
3/5 = 6/10

:lol
Flavius
Member
(08-20-2008, 03:05 AM)

Flavius's Avatar
#1638

Originally Posted by Polari:
Agreed. My point is review scores don't scale. Of course, make a point that might possibly be construed as being in favour of Too Human in this thread and everyone has a field day. Idiots.
I picture you posting this with toilet tissue stuck to the bottom of one of your shoes.

Sublime.
SailorDaravon
Member
(08-20-2008, 03:19 AM)

SailorDaravon's Avatar
#1639

Originally Posted by Father_Brain:
[img]http://g.photos.cx/cv0056small-6d.jpg[img]
Holy crap :lol :lol
Chiggs
Oh that my words were now spoken!
Oh that they were printed in a book!
(08-20-2008, 03:25 AM)

Chiggs's Avatar
#1640

Originally Posted by Polari:
Agreed. My point is review scores don't scale. Of course, make a point that might possibly be construed as being in favour of Too Human in this thread and everyone has a field day. Idiots.
Now it is, at least.
Amir0x
demodded, not denutted
(08-20-2008, 03:29 AM)

Amir0x's Avatar
#1641

i dont think anyone even cared what the context was in relation to Too Human, to be honest Polari.

But hey it's a good cover, run with it
Poimandres
Member
(08-20-2008, 03:34 AM)

Poimandres's Avatar
#1642

When I see 3/5 I think "decent"

When I see 6/10 I think "average"

Technically, they equate, but they seem to imply different levels of quality. Perhaps it is my perceptions that are at fault.
sprsk
force push the doodoo rock
(08-20-2008, 03:34 AM)

sprsk's Avatar
#1643

Someone who says something really stupid turns and calls everyone else stupid.

This is the thread that keeps on giving.
duk
Banned
(08-20-2008, 03:35 AM)

duk's Avatar
#1644

Originally Posted by Polari:
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
wait what? :lol
flintstryker

(08-20-2008, 03:58 AM)

flintstryker's Avatar
#1645

Why the hell is a thread about game that gaf supposedly hate so big?
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(08-20-2008, 03:59 AM)

border's Avatar
#1646

Originally Posted by Spurs_Fan:
http://www.g4tv.com/xplay/reviews/1823/Too_Human.html

the review for those who want it
and like someone said earlier it does sound like the reviewer rips into GAF without actuallly saying it:lol
Why isn't this narrated by Sessler or Webb? Did they leave they show, or has the format changed? I haven't watched in a few years....

Originally Posted by Linkzg:
"So Giancarlo, welcome to Ziff-Davis media..."

"Actually I've been here about 7 or 8 years"

"Well, I'm glad we outsourced our Too Human review to you."

:lol :lol
Polari
(08-20-2008, 04:10 AM)

Polari's Avatar
#1647

Originally Posted by sp0rsk:
Someone who says something really stupid turns and calls everyone else stupid.

This is the thread that keeps on giving.
Go on then, give me a tag.

Oh wait...
EviLore
Expansive Ellipses
(08-20-2008, 04:22 AM)

EviLore's Avatar
#1649

Originally Posted by Polari:
Go on then, give me a tag.

Oh wait...
oh wait
Farnack
Banned
(08-20-2008, 04:22 AM)
#1650

Originally Posted by Polari:
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
i dont think anyone even cared what the context was in relation to Too Human, to be honest Polari.

But hey it's a good cover, run with it
Go on then, give me a tag.

Oh wait...
Fixed

Edit: Oh snap the lore was lurkin