Disagree. It's good for the smaller titles to be in the same spotlight IMO.
Right
Except that in that spotlight, you look at something like Chariot (ignore its a GwG title, use Kickbeat as a different example if you like), it came out the same week as FH2, which has a whole 4 separate listings on the store... so it will never have been listed as a new release (on the front of the inside of the store) because Shadow of Mordor came out the same week. Theres plenty of other titles that have/will have the same issue.
Now when they fix the issue of multiple pages per game (which is bizarre in itself) it won't be as quite as bad, but when you have lots of titles releasing in a short space of time, it won't be the Call of Duty's, Far Cry 4s etc that go missing because they'll still be elsewhere on the front end (which is fair enough).
If they had their own branding, whether its an ID@Xbox section or some sort of branding "XBL Game" or something to include stuff like Styx and Defense Grid 2 - not ID@Xbox titles, but not retail either you could just switch tabs and get a big section for a whole load of games that people might not know exist because they aren't big enough to have massive marketing campaigns for exposure.
If I remember correctly, the developer of Sixty Second Shooter Prime said that as part of his deal to put the game on Xbox One he wanted a guarantee of the front of the visibility because presumably he knew without that guarantee it would just get buried within about a week.
They don't list the right demos... How to Survive has a trial, but its not listed, entire thing seems disorganised and lacks the ability to promote anything other than the biggest names.
I don't even like the size of the boxes either. I just think it looks like they don't know what to put there, so they've just made everything bigger to hide it.
