|
Member
(05-13-2009, 02:23 AM)
|
Is this a good idea or racist?
#1
Family only buys from black business.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
(05-13-2009, 02:34 AM)
|
#6
Originally Posted by Servizio:
It's a bad idea and racist. I'm sure in their mind though, it's a black empowerment thing when they really are discriminating. |
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 02:34 AM)
|
#7
Originally Posted by Coins:
Anyways shit seems mad inconvenient. I'm not going out my way to buy a Snickers bar 15 miles away just cause the guy who owns the store is black. |
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 02:40 AM)
|
#10
Originally Posted by GrapeApes:
|
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 02:52 AM)
|
#14
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
So they'll only eat from a McDonald's franchise owned by a black person too? Just buy your shit from whoever stocks what you want at the cheapest price. Try that for a while. It usually works out for all involved. |
|
Probably plays more games than you
(05-13-2009, 02:55 AM)
|
#16
Just because something involves race doesn't mean it's racist.
I guess I don't read this as "boycotting white business" or anything, so much as a social experiment in finding out "can I live my life for a year patronizing only black businesses." And they have to travel 14 miles to a grocery store, even though there are shitloads of 1) grocery stores and 2) black people in metro Atlanta. But there aren't a lot of independently owned grocery stores anymore, period, and there certainly aren't many of those that are owned by black people (obviously from the article). I *don't* think it's a smart idea to try such an experiment when you have young children, but presumably if the baby came down with an ear infection and they had to use a 24-hour chain pharmacy they would sigh and do it. It's a lot like people trying to survive on locally-owned businesses alone, to me. And it's got the added kicker of trying to support a community that is such a high percentage of the population but still controls such a small percentage of the capital. I think it's kind of cool and if they write a book about it I will read it. Bonus Edit: for those saying "if someone said 'I only buy from white-owned businesses' then that would be considered racist," well DUH, that is what most of us already DO here in America. We just aren't aware of it. |
|
(05-13-2009, 02:56 AM)
|
#17
Dumb and racist.
I patronize stores and businesses that give me at least good service and price, I could care less about the color of the owner's skin. |
|
john deere tramp stamp
(05-13-2009, 02:58 AM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by Ela Hadrun:
|
|
(05-13-2009, 02:59 AM)
|
#19
i respect their integrity, but wish they were boycotting stores for other reasons.
|
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 02:59 AM)
|
#20
Originally Posted by Ela Hadrun:
|
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:01 AM)
|
#22
Originally Posted by Ela Hadrun:
|
|
if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
(05-13-2009, 03:02 AM)
|
#24
Originally Posted by Coins:
I support the little mom and pop stores in my area. I can get most things for a bit cheaper in the big stores but I feel good putting money directly into the owner's hands... But it is not a new concept and a lot of people do it, they just aren't writing stories about them..
Originally Posted by neptunes:
|
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:04 AM)
|
#25
Originally Posted by Blackace:
|
|
if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
(05-13-2009, 03:08 AM)
|
#28
Originally Posted by Coins:
While it is true there are a lot less black owned businesses and they do need suppotr, but I think you have to pick your battles rather than drawing a line in the sand. They need support and they need to make good products not just have people buying blindly, they need to be able to sell to the world if they really want black businesses to succeed. |
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:09 AM)
|
#29
I understand wanting to support independently owned businesses but if race is an issue, patronizing black-owned businesses isn't a very strong political statement. After all, those business are buying their Snickers bars, toilet paper, and bottled water from manufacturers that are not exclusively black owned.
|
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:10 AM)
|
#30
I don't really care that much to be honest.
It might be a tad bit racist but I do also see some reasoning behind it. What I'd find funny is what if some white people decided to only shop at black owned stores to help the cause, how would that fly over? But really, I couldn't care less about this, the ratio is fucked up so people correcting it on their own is fine with me. |
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 03:10 AM)
|
#31
Racism = Prejudice + Power.
Black people cannot be racist. Any action that a black person makes that could be perceived racist by a white person is in the end a result of the continued white privilege in this country. There is zero incidence of a white person being thought of as less than human because of the color of their skin. These people are simply trying to support others with similar cultural heritage and to be in that culture, not trying to put down white people. Duurrr, why's there no WET to go with BET, because everything else is fucking WET. |
|
(05-13-2009, 03:15 AM)
|
#33
Originally Posted by PantherLotus:
these people are distinguishing who they buy from based on the factor of race. that is racist. don't know how you could argue otherwise. whether or not it's right or justified has nothing to do with it.
Quote:
Last edited by BobbyRobby; 05-13-2009 at 03:18 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:18 AM)
|
#36
I think it's both. It's racist, but it may help bring attention to the underlying issues responsible for the lack of black owned businesses (or locally owned, for that matter). However, I don't think that the movement is going to have a major financial impact.
|
|
thanks for the laugh
(05-13-2009, 03:18 AM)
|
#37
Originally Posted by Blackace:
|
|
Everything is tsundere to me
(05-13-2009, 03:20 AM)
|
#38
this concept is moronic. they can be as stupid and inconvenient with their money as they like, but it gives me the right to judge them as morons. then again anyone doing this will have to be well off, and quite honestly, sensible enough to see its stupidity, or a set of standard suburban morons who think they're doing "the right thing"
says the white boy reclining in the kitchen of a comfortable house in inner city Jersey... |
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:22 AM)
|
#39
Originally Posted by BobbyRobby:
Someone brought up Asian communities for example, while it might be a little "racist" there's something to be said about being able to go to an Asian market and get something you can't get from Wal-Mart, so I do see a thriving minority that's able to have kept hold of it's culture as a plus for everyone. We robbed the Black people of most of their culture so this social experiment might seems a little boring but that doesn't mean I don't think it should take place. Like I said earlier the ratio is fucked up. |
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 03:23 AM)
|
#40
Originally Posted by doomed1:
Just like rich people who only buy organic foods or from locally owned businesses to |
|
(05-13-2009, 03:28 AM)
|
#42
Originally Posted by mAcOdIn:
i almost exclusively buy pizza from italians. i'm being racist, but i don't feel guilty about it. |
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 03:30 AM)
|
#44
Originally Posted by KHarvey16:
Any "racism" that blacks may exhibit is not racism because without the power to go along with it it is nothing but prejudice. In the same vein, any man who has viewed a woman as purely an object, i.e. porn is a sexist, including myself. In both scenarios you have a procrustean view of the other person involved, meaning you take that persons identity, conform it to how you think they should be viewed and then return it to them in that state. |
|
(05-13-2009, 03:32 AM)
|
#45
Originally Posted by Xeke:
even with your wonky definition, blacks can be racist. what about a white guy who goes to camden and is robbed for being white. in that situation, the blacks are in power. just because one race is in power in our country, doesn't mean they are in power on smaller scales in different communities.
Last edited by BobbyRobby; 05-13-2009 at 03:37 AM.
|
|
Purple Drazi
(05-13-2009, 03:33 AM)
|
#46
Originally Posted by Ela Hadrun:
|
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 03:34 AM)
|
#47
Originally Posted by Xeke:
Racism is a word with a definition. These qualifiers you're adding aren't required, even if someone wrote it in their book. |
|
Member
(05-13-2009, 03:34 AM)
|
#48
Originally Posted by Xeke:
I would say that factually your ascertation is wrong and that an individual who is on the receiving end of racism by blacks or any other group for that matter couldn't care less if that same group wasn't able to hold their power over the entirety of his race, it's enough, to him, that he alone is the subject of racism. |
|
Banned
(05-13-2009, 03:35 AM)
|
#49
Originally Posted by BobbyRobby:
If you've ever felt more uncomfortable being around a black man than a white man than you are a racist. Plain and simple. You're not actively being a racist, but you're doing nothing to stem it and because of that you're just as guilty.
Quote:
Last edited by Xeke; 05-13-2009 at 03:41 AM.
|
|
PoliGAF Co-Champion
(05-13-2009, 03:39 AM)
|
#50
This is no different than the Christian Yellow Pages that you can find, or the Gay Yellow Pages.
I'll gladly admit that if you published a "White Yellow Pages" listing only white business owners, people would be incredibly offended. That's the price of being the oppressive majority, I suppose. I try to always buy local, but since my area is very mixed, I put money into the pockets of people of many different races. |