|
Member
(07-29-2009, 01:30 PM)
|
#104
Originally Posted by Meier:
Call of Duty however has never been a jaggy looking game but always 600p @ 60fps. I'm surprised anyone would assume it would change with MW2. |
|
Member
(07-29-2009, 01:32 PM)
|
#109
Originally Posted by Wollan:
It will be the definitive FPS on the 360 and the PS3. Get over it. Its like.. you can't get behind a game unless its a Sony exclusive -.- |
|
(07-29-2009, 01:35 PM)
|
#114
Originally Posted by hamzik:
Originally Posted by dammitmattt:
Last edited by Haunted; 07-29-2009 at 01:38 PM.
|
|
(07-29-2009, 01:38 PM)
|
#122
everyone should just buy a nice PC and bitch less
this forum would be so much brighter |
|
(07-29-2009, 01:38 PM)
|
#123
Originally Posted by Mohonky:
|
|
Banned
(07-29-2009, 01:38 PM)
|
#124
Originally Posted by Gaogaogao:
Originally Posted by iceatsc:
|
|
It is illegal to Tag Fish in Tag Fishing Sanctuaries by law 38.36 of the GAF Wildlife Act
(07-29-2009, 01:40 PM)
|
#127
Originally Posted by Rez:
Originally Posted by dammitmattt:
Leave iceatsc alone. |
|
(07-29-2009, 01:44 PM)
|
#129
Originally Posted by swerve:
This thread will be printed out, rolled up, and introduced rectally to the next guy that waddles into a Wii thread and complains about the SD resolution. I will make sure to include some broken glass and ground pepper, and maybe a live gerbil if I can find one. |
|
Banned
(07-29-2009, 01:46 PM)
|
#134
Graphics in COD4 were fine. Sounds like there's not gonna be much of a change. So who cares? The gameplay is what matters. I'm not sure I like the sound of being able to use the A321 in multiplayer, though. That just sounds kinda dumb.
Originally Posted by Dedalus:
Who plays an FPS on a console, anyway? Who uses a console, anyway? |
|
freaky fetish expert
(07-29-2009, 01:48 PM)
|
#135
Graphics only matter to the point whatever the posters console of choice is capable of. Wii owners claim graphics don't equal more fun, Xbox and PS fans claim better graphics make more fun up until sub HD resolutions, at which no-one can tell the difference anyway. Of course PC gamers accept no compromises, thats why we always win.
|
|
Banned
(07-29-2009, 01:48 PM)
|
#137
Originally Posted by iceatcs:
|
|
Super Adventure Boxing
(07-29-2009, 01:48 PM)
|
#138
Originally Posted by Roxas:
Hell, even when it's not functional. *looks at the last Need For Speed's 5 million sales* |
|
(07-29-2009, 01:49 PM)
|
#139
Originally Posted by TheHeretic:
|
|
Member
(07-29-2009, 01:50 PM)
|
#141
Originally Posted by Nirolak:
|
|
Banned
(07-29-2009, 01:51 PM)
|
#142
Originally Posted by SundaySounds:
|
|
Banned
(07-29-2009, 01:52 PM)
|
#143
Originally Posted by Nirolak:
|
|
Banned
(07-29-2009, 01:55 PM)
|
#146
Hd is so overated it makes me sick.
Hd is just resolution. It is such a small part of graphic fidelity. Yet its hailed as the most important feautere. Resident evil 4, which was one of the best looking games last gen ran at a lower resolution than the average game. Yet it was still one of the best looking games. same with cod4. If the choice is lower framerate, lesser geometry, lower quality shader whatever or lower resolution. Resolution should always be the one to go. |
|
Member
(07-29-2009, 01:56 PM)
|
#147
Only 600p??!
Oh no, how will I enjoy the game? Oh wait, nobody notices it. If it was never announced, nobody would know. And if you have to count pixels or however that works to be sure, well, that just proves my point. If you have to count pixels to tell what resolution something is at, it obviously doesn't matter since you can't tell by looking at it. :lol If it was something like framerate, then you have something to complain about it. I'll be fine playing this on my 1080p set at whatever resolution it gives me. |
|
Member
(07-29-2009, 01:57 PM)
|
#150
Originally Posted by Itsintheairtonight:
|