• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF

dammitmattt
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:29 PM)

Originally Posted by iceatcs

I know, hurt innit?

I never know what you are trying to say. Do you have your own special brand of English that you use?
iceatcs
Junior Member
(07-29-2009, 02:30 PM)
iceatcs's Avatar
I do give a shit

Originally Posted by dammitmattt

I never know what you are trying to say. Do you have your own special brand of English that you use?

Annoy innit?
Absoludacrous
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:30 PM)
Absoludacrous's Avatar

Originally Posted by Raide

Wow, is this the CoD4 Thread of Time Travel? I am sure I have heard these complaints before and I think COD4 just about survived. :lol

Nope, it totally flopped due to sub-HD resolution. The people have spoken!
Mohonky
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:30 PM)
Mohonky's Avatar

Originally Posted by Meier

Speaking of XXXp's, I was kind of shocked that inFAMOUS only runs at 720p. Regarding the OP, I think everyone can feel pretty confident that it will look great either way.

You were shocked it only ran at 720p? Are you shitting me? It looks like an utter jag fest in places. I wouldn't have been surprised if it was running below 720p. Even for 720p it looks jagged.

Call of Duty however has never been a jaggy looking game but always 600p @ 60fps. I'm surprised anyone would assume it would change with MW2.
Fersis
It is illegal to Tag Fish in Tag Fishing Sanctuaries by law 38.36 of the GAF Wildlife Act
(07-29-2009, 02:31 PM)
Fersis's Avatar
You know what would be awesome ?:

UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.
mario ate my burger
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:31 PM)
My original comment was sarcastic, I meant to put in a smilie, but forgot :(

Buying it regardless of resolution, first one was amazing.
hamzik
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:31 PM)
hamzik's Avatar

Originally Posted by Dra-Q

[IMG]http://i29.************/2urp1xc.gif[/IMG]

Notice that this gif is courtesy of ESPN HD.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(07-29-2009, 02:31 PM)
iceatcs's Avatar

Originally Posted by Fersis

You know what would be awesome ?:

UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.

Big time
NarcissisticJay
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:32 PM)

Originally Posted by Wollan

So they did nothing besides add some pre-defined item destrucion (which were already plenty in COD4).
Seeing the E3 footage it looked *exactly* like COD4. I would like for them to release yesterdays MP footage in 720p (or 600p) though I guess there is no need.


It looks like COD4 which is okay today. I think it plays superb (COD4) but it's dissappointing that they didn't use the income from 14 million(!) sold games to enhance the graphics.

Great Graphics <> Great Games!

It will be the definitive FPS on the 360 and the PS3. Get over it.

Its like.. you can't get behind a game unless its a Sony exclusive -.-
Dina
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:32 PM)
Dina's Avatar
14 million users who don't give a shit.
dammitmattt
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:33 PM)

Originally Posted by iceatcs

I do give a shit

Annoy innit?

Using make believe words and poor grammar is not cool. And it's never been cool.
Zefah
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:34 PM)
Luckily most console gamers don't give a shit about resolution and PC gamers will be happy because they can set their own resolution.
Fersis
It is illegal to Tag Fish in Tag Fishing Sanctuaries by law 38.36 of the GAF Wildlife Act
(07-29-2009, 02:35 PM)
Fersis's Avatar

Originally Posted by iceatcs

Big time

I would pay some bucks if arne says it.
Haunted
(07-29-2009, 02:35 PM)
Haunted's Avatar

Originally Posted by hamzik

Notice that this gif is courtesy of ESPN HD.

bs, that .gif isn't 720p at all.


Originally Posted by dammitmattt

Using make believe words and poor grammar is not cool. And it's never been cool.

Well, I do know that innit is slang for isn't it, but the grammar in his posts is usually pretty terrible. I always chalked it up to him not being a native English speaker and it being his second or third language or something.
Last edited by Haunted; 07-29-2009 at 02:38 PM.
kamorra
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:35 PM)
kamorra's Avatar

Originally Posted by Fersis

You know what would be awesome ?:

UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.

You mean like the e-drama in this thread?
JMC
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:36 PM)

Originally Posted by Meier

Speaking of XXXp's, I was kind of shocked that inFAMOUS only runs at 720p.

Why?
Dabanton
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:36 PM)
Dabanton's Avatar

Originally Posted by dammitmattt

I hate GAF sometimes.

The real sad thing is this thread will no doubt reach 10+ pages in the next few hours. :lol
Gaogaogao
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:36 PM)
Gaogaogao's Avatar

Originally Posted by dammitmattt

Using make believe words and poor grammar is not cool. And it's never been cool.

[IMG]http://i29.************/24g15e0.jpg[/IMG]
iceatcs
Junior Member
(07-29-2009, 02:36 PM)
iceatcs's Avatar

Originally Posted by kamorra

You mean like the e-drama in this thread?

that's weak. It will far much worse esp both sides.
kamorra
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:37 PM)
kamorra's Avatar

Originally Posted by iceatcs

that's weak. It will far much worse esp both sides.

Well there is only one side in this thread.
Audioboxer4
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:38 PM)
10,500,000 of the 11,000,000 people who bought COD4 didn't know any better or give a shit.

(and that's being generous saying 500k did)

Same applies to every resolution thread, as long as the game itself still looks decent/good on the TV.
Rez
(07-29-2009, 02:38 PM)
Rez's Avatar
everyone should just buy a nice PC and bitch less

this forum would be so much brighter
Meier
(07-29-2009, 02:38 PM)
Meier's Avatar

Originally Posted by Mohonky

You were shocked it only ran at 720p? Are you shitting me? It looks like an utter jag fest in places. I wouldn't have been surprised if it was running below 720p. Even for 720p it looks jagged.

Well, I just meant when I booted it up and my TV switched resolutions from 1080p, I was surprised that it did not run in it (just started last week). I don't think the jaggies are too bad...haven't really noticed them to be honest -- pop-in happens at times, but fairly minimally.
dammitmattt
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:38 PM)

Originally Posted by Gaogaogao

[IMG]http://i29.************/24g15e0.jpg[/IMG]

Originally Posted by iceatsc

that's weak. It will far much worse esp both sides.

There's bad grammar and then there's such a blatant disregard for grammar that it's impossible to tell what someone is saying. This second label applies for every single iceatsc post.
iceatcs
Junior Member
(07-29-2009, 02:38 PM)
iceatcs's Avatar

Originally Posted by kamorra

Well there is only one side in this thread.

Not really there are 4 sides in there.

dammitmattt, I don't give a fuck. I know you know me that I'm Deaf. Stop follow me.
Foliorum Viridum
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:40 PM)
Foliorum Viridum's Avatar
After that recent multiplayer trailer the game could be in 480p for all I care.
Fersis
It is illegal to Tag Fish in Tag Fishing Sanctuaries by law 38.36 of the GAF Wildlife Act
(07-29-2009, 02:40 PM)
Fersis's Avatar

Originally Posted by Rez

everyone should just buy a nice PC and bitch less

this forum would be so much brighter

Im poor LOL

Originally Posted by dammitmattt

There's bad grammar and then there's such a blatant disregard for grammar that it's impossible to tell what someone is saying. This second label applies for every single iceatsc post.

Grammar nazis are like the pixel counters of life. THEY SUCK! :lol
Leave iceatsc alone.
Orobi
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:40 PM)
Orobi's Avatar

Originally Posted by Rottweiler

:lol @ Activision

:lol @ Infinity Ward

:lol @ First Person Shooters

Agree :)
CTLance
(07-29-2009, 02:44 PM)
CTLance's Avatar

Originally Posted by swerve

Higher resolution != more fun.

OK. I'm with DeaconKnowledge.

This thread will be printed out, rolled up, and introduced rectally to the next guy that waddles into a Wii thread and complains about the SD resolution. I will make sure to include some broken glass and ground pepper, and maybe a live gerbil if I can find one.
permutated
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:45 PM)
Looks great to me.

:lol at all the "gamers" missing out because they care too much about fucking resolution.
Dedalus
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:46 PM)
Dedalus's Avatar
Bahahaha, I love my PC, 1920x1200 at 60fps for me :D

[img]http://i25.************/2nvrn00.png[/img]
*cough*
StuBurns
just talking loud
and saying nothing
(07-29-2009, 02:46 PM)
StuBurns's Avatar
600 is all the p's a guy needs. It's still going to look great.

I'm not buying it myself, but letting resolution hold you back? Crazy talk.
Caesar III
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:46 PM)
Caesar III's Avatar

Originally Posted by Haunted

Tell that to the people bitching about the Wii's 480p!

This!

I'm one of these "Gameplay >>>> Graphics" Guys but this is ridiculous. Like Haunted said this is not that far away from SD resolution :lol
SundaySounds
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:46 PM)
Graphics in COD4 were fine. Sounds like there's not gonna be much of a change. So who cares? The gameplay is what matters. I'm not sure I like the sound of being able to use the A321 in multiplayer, though. That just sounds kinda dumb.

Originally Posted by Dedalus

Bahahaha, I love my PC, 1920x1200 at 60fps for me :D

[img]http://i25.************/2nvrn00.png[/img]
*cough*

Oh, and this.

Who plays an FPS on a console, anyway?
Who uses a console, anyway?
TheHeretic
freaky fetish expert
(07-29-2009, 02:48 PM)
Graphics only matter to the point whatever the posters console of choice is capable of. Wii owners claim graphics don't equal more fun, Xbox and PS fans claim better graphics make more fun up until sub HD resolutions, at which no-one can tell the difference anyway. Of course PC gamers accept no compromises, thats why we always win.
aryies
Junior Member
(07-29-2009, 02:48 PM)
it will run at what i tell it to run. hello 1080p
dammitmattt
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:48 PM)

Originally Posted by iceatcs

Not really there are 4 sides in there.

dammitmattt, I don't give a fuck. I know you know me that I'm Deaf. Stop follow me.

What does that have to do with your writing? I don't mind poor grammar if it doesn't get in the way of your message, but I literally don't know what you are saying in the vast majority of your posts. Maybe you have some kind of learning disability, and if so, I apologize, but barring that, there's no reason to not re-read your 10-word posts to ensure that the rest of the forum can understand what you're trying to say.
Nirolak
Mrgrgr
(07-29-2009, 02:48 PM)
Nirolak's Avatar

Originally Posted by Roxas

Only 0.01% of the people who will buy this game give a shit about the resolution.

To be honest the same can really be said about framerate as long as its function.

Hell, even when it's not functional. *looks at the last Need For Speed's 5 million sales*
Rez
(07-29-2009, 02:49 PM)
Rez's Avatar

Originally Posted by TheHeretic

Graphics only matter to the point whatever the posters console of choice is capable of. Wii owners claim graphics don't equal more fun, Xbox and PS fans claim better graphics make more fun up until sub HD resolutions, at which no-one can tell anyway. Of course PC gamers accept no compromises, thats why we always win.

I don't know, I'm a pretty flexible guy. If you'll recall earlier, I wrote a little diddy about not giving a shit.
rvy
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:50 PM)
rvy's Avatar
Does anyone seriously give a shit? Only PC gamers are going to care about this.
StuBurns
just talking loud
and saying nothing
(07-29-2009, 02:50 PM)
StuBurns's Avatar

Originally Posted by Nirolak

To be honest the same can really be said about framerate as long as its function.

Hell, even when it's not functional. *looks at the last Need For Speed's 5 million sales*

I think image quality is harder to appreciate than motion fluidity. A lot of people still don't have a HDTV.
dammitmattt
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:51 PM)

Originally Posted by SundaySounds

Graphics in COD4 were fine. Sounds like there's not gonna be much of a change. So who cares? The gameplay is what matters. I'm not sure I like the sound of being able to use the A321 in multiplayer, though. That just sounds kinda dumb.

You get to fly an Airbus in MW2?!?

Yoboman
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:52 PM)

Originally Posted by Nirolak

To be honest the same can really be said about framerate as long as its function.

Hell, even when it's not functional. *looks at the last Need For Speed's 5 million sales*

Not really a shit framerate would damage the game alot. Many fans wouldn't even realise why, but they'd think the game feels worse.
DirtRiver
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:52 PM)
DirtRiver's Avatar

Originally Posted by Fersis

You know what would be awesome ?:

UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.

polyh3dron
couldn't find a lab with German shepherds
(07-29-2009, 02:54 PM)
polyh3dron's Avatar
Fuck all this bitching, it's a worthy tradeoff to get 60FPS which matters much more to me.
Itsintheairtonight
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:55 PM)
Hd is so overated it makes me sick.

Hd is just resolution. It is such a small part of graphic fidelity. Yet its hailed as the most important feautere.

Resident evil 4, which was one of the best looking games last gen ran at a lower resolution than the average game. Yet it was still one of the best looking games.

same with cod4.

If the choice is lower framerate, lesser geometry, lower quality shader whatever or lower resolution.

Resolution should always be the one to go.
VGChampion
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:56 PM)
VGChampion's Avatar
Only 600p??!

Oh no, how will I enjoy the game? Oh wait, nobody notices it. If it was never announced, nobody would know. And if you have to count pixels or however that works to be sure, well, that just proves my point. If you have to count pixels to tell what resolution something is at, it obviously doesn't matter since you can't tell by looking at it. :lol

If it was something like framerate, then you have something to complain about it. I'll be fine playing this on my 1080p set at whatever resolution it gives me.
vermadas
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:56 PM)
vermadas's Avatar
People shouldn't be surprised, it's been a few years since the start of this console gen. Sacrifices have to be made somewhere.

60 FPS. 720p. Overall visual fidelity. Pick two. Not enough? Play on the PC.
Dra-Q
Banned
(07-29-2009, 02:57 PM)

Originally Posted by Dedalus

[img]http://i29.************/9t1vfl.jpg[/img]
*cough*

fixed.

But how can they already know in which resolution the game renders?
deepbrown
Member
(07-29-2009, 02:57 PM)
deepbrown's Avatar

Originally Posted by Itsintheairtonight

Hd is so overated it makes me sick.

Hd is just resolution. It is such a small part of graphic fidelity. Yet its hailed as the most important feautere.

Resident evil 4, which was one of the best looking games last gen ran at a lower resolution than the average game. Yet it was still one of the best looking games.

same with cod4.

If the choice is lower framerate, lesser geometry, lower quality shader whatever or lower resolution.

Resolution should always be the one to go.

Was that a poem?

Thread Tools