Yea that's definitely nonsense, consistently i'm the last person to say something in the thread. And to use an example in this thread:stating "bad shooting" isn't explaining what you don't like, what's bad about the shooting? Input lag, floaty, etc? Just stating that something is bad isn't an explanation. And then the narrative that you tried to present in this thread because you purposefully try to pretend like yearly releases=no time for engine changes or radical gameplay changes or even general improvements, this is completely false. When you're constantly using that argument that's based on of something that's just not true than you aren't really trying to have a discussion. And no i've never stated that "no one can dislike these games."
You're not the first to ignore what i'm saying in favor of passively aggressively attacking me.
Cant say Im not entertained
Sorry if it seemed that way.I started with "that's nonsense," and proceeded to explain why. If I had just said "that's nonsense" you'd have a point.So, someone tells you "this is why you come off like this in these threads", proceeds to explain, and your response is "that's definitely nonsense"? Sounds awfully familiar.
Yes, it's quite common,I'm kinda new here and frankly it was my first time seeing that tagline of yours. And I found it funny given the thread title. I'm not passively agressively attacking you.
So, someone tells you "this is why you come off like this in these threads", proceeds to explain, and your response is "that's definitely nonsense"? Sounds awfully familiar.
I think one of the problems here is that "We're listening" doesn't mean the same to everyone (nor does it really give any details as to what it entails) and neither the people here are really the people that Ubisoft really even wants to listen to. They certainly have a lot to fix and their first round with the new consoles left a lot to be desired (they aren't the only ones caught by the difficulties these new consoles have cause for developers), but they are still making the games the majority wants to buy. They aren't going to listen to us when it comes to "their formula", but I do think we'll see them work to overcome some of the technical issues they have had for their latest productions. Especially Unity was a massive learning experience for the teams that worked on it, but there's not much I could go into detail. I would also argue that it doesn't necessarily mean anything when it comes to The Division, it has no doubt faced most of the same issues that most proprietary engine developers have had and the same issues with working on unfinished tech and software.
I get it.
The idea was that it would've been "an astonishingly detailed retailed recreation of Chicago." But then they actually got their hands on the hardware, and also had to make it cross gen. Next gen only sequel should be much bigger in terms of scale if Unity is any indication.
It does shooting and stealth exceptionally well, As well as open ended mission design, in a time where GTAV/Saints Row had incredibly scripted main missions, it released with very open mission design where the player can do what they want. Wanna hack you way in without ever stepping into the base, good, wanna go in guns blazing shooting grenades out of midair, great, wanna get in and out both lethally and non lethally, even with just a pistol and some lures even better, you're allowed to do these things in the majority of missions in the game. This punctuated by an incredibly responsive character who gets over obstacles with relatively ease.
and responds to player input quite fast with no floaty reticle,
Maybe it was only for news outlets and LPers then? You're talking about the gang hideout/Bloody Nora alpha build demo right?
Unsuspecting? I think anyone should know what to expect from a Ubisoft Game at this point.
Heheh, ayup.
