For the same reason you mentioned, while this iteration will still be fine, next iteration the gap will be wider and the issues will pop up. Unless Nintendo pulls up another Wii U and drops another console mid gen.
Wii U lived what it needed to live, for better or worse Nintendo is outside the traditional console cycle since the Wii
I was thinking that the SCD could use defected chips from the fab that can't be used in the consoles. For example, they may not necessarily need the same number of CPU cores for the SCD so they can use parts with more CPU defects.
I am now officially worried for Nintendo. Just seems like it's bizarre news after bizarre news
There is no more generations. There is no more cycles, except for "how many iOS versions to we give this older iPhone" applied to the console space. Guess it hasn't hit everyone yet.
Gaming/platform as a service is real now. Nintendo can put out another nx device whenever it wants. Just like what Sony and Microsoft are working towards now. They can all do it yearly if they were so inclined. With more than 50 or maybe even 60 million devices between them, they aren't going to be abandoning the base any time soon.
And lol at people thinking anyone is selling the new premium sku at a loss. Enthusiast market is used to taking it how they give it. This won't be any different
Actually in this case it's bizarre news BEFORE bizarre news. Check the date of the OP, this thread's been around for a while.
We just don't know how they'll approach it. Traditionally we see NCL (EPD) really focus on a system for it's first 2-3 years, then after that support is mostly via engine recycled sequels, external 1st party studios and contracted 3rd party partners. This trend could continue as is with NX and the systems would still see solid 1st party support for a full console cycle.Yeah, but with the iterative consoles, the mid and late cycle should overlap with the early and mid cycle of the next iteration. So this should not happen again. But this also mean that NX2 can't be too far away in specs from NX. Which will mean that the gap will get big enough for Nintendo to lose contact with the others in the second iteration.
I think Microsoft plans Scorpio as the first console in the iterative ones, they will break from Xbone.
So for me, Nintendo is creating their own niche going forward.
"The sky is falling" the thread.
Drive-by shitposting, the example.
Yeah I had completely forgot about that... :-\I think earlier in this thread we had a few people saying that SLI doesn't optimize well for gaming, for whatever reason.
I would never do such a thing. My post reflects the overall mood conveyed in this thread and all who posted in it prior to my own.
We just don't know how they'll approach it. Traditionally we see NCL (EPD) really focus on a system for it's first 2-3 years, then after that support is mostly via engine recycled sequels, external 1st party studios and contracted 3rd party partners. This trend could continue as is with NX and the systems would still see solid 1st party support for a full console cycle.
There's also the whole handheld factor. Today's NX console spec could be tomorrow's NX handheld spec, ensuring continued Japanese and indie support for longer without necessarily synching up to the PS/Xbox upgrade cycle. Going this route Nintendo systems could even see longer than usual support.
That's a pretty big "if". I'm still not convinced the market is there to support this business plan for a video game console. It may go well this time around but I have a feeling it tails off very quickly.
As for Nintendo, perhaps the rumors from last year about them going with a very affordable console that can upgrade over time are true. That may be their niche in this space.
It adds nothing to the discussion, it doesn't even express your own opinion on the topic at hand. It has practically no added value even assuming that your summary would be correct.
That practically means creating their own niche. Which is neither good nor bad until we see the success of this initiative.
And crying about the rumored specs of the Neo and Scorpio is? And since when has Nintendo's competition ever factored into their own hardware making decisions?
I think earlier in this thread we had a few people saying that SLI doesn't optimize well for gaming, for whatever reason. That's one of the things I'd like some more tech minded people to expand on, especially now that we are trying to figure out if an NX with SCDs could compete with a 6TF Scorpio.
I dont see why being an Arm co sole would be a detriment at this point
"Enough power" at a mass market pricepoint with easy development tools and a large volume of quality software?
Sounds good enough to me... At least on the consumer end. You guys can argue the rest
3. Can someone explain why exactly it is so difficult to use two GPUs on the same task? Again, I don't know much about how processing works at these levels, so if it's simply not possible that really does limit the usefulness of the SCD idea. But if Nintendo could come up with some solution for supplementing GPU power the SCDs get a lot more interesting.
The 3 assumptions you're making can still be argued though.
There's always going to be some kind of software overhead. So if one SCD and console have the same GPU specs, you won't get 2x performance. It's more like 1.7-1.8x. If you can plug in more than one SCD, the overhead increases as well.
I've heard that DX12's implementation of multi-GPU is pretty easy to get working compared to SLI or Crossfire, and it allows for asymmetrical GPU configs. Does Vulkan have a similar thing?
The dream of giant addons is not one I share tbh and I don't think it will be a reality. I don't know much about linking multiple devices but you might as well forget about using the original processor if you're picturing high end console specs to be repeatedly matched in a series of new console sized boxes.
As far as I understood it an SCD should have the ability to run semi independently, at least as part of a remote network, this would require it to have its own cpu and Ram, network chip, it can't only be a new graphics processor that slots in to your console. It would practically be a new console minus tv out, media slot, and storage..
What I think is much more likely to see is an scd being a proprietary data storage device, the patent iirc says it could cover either data resources or processing resources, and a data style addon (a networked hdd) would in my mind gel very closely with their patent for game apparatus without optical drive, which deals with copying data to other devices at varying speeds.
The most basic thing that must be understood is that SLI/Crossfire run a single program designed to use 1 GPU on 2 or more GPUs.
A relatively simple use of SCD featuring everything would be utilizing "legacy" SoC exclusively for OS stuff (...which is sort of similar to Nintendo's usage of BC elements in their existing systems...). Besides that (and running multiple games at once for whatever reason), you're moving into a single game explicitly managing multiple GPUs. This should work well with split screen or GamePad (assuming TV and GP are both busy with their own non-trivial things), and similar situations where you have some really obviously separate stuff going on (maybe some GPGPU stuff would qualify, I'm not sure).
However if you have a game which does nothing like that, and most single player games at the moment don't seem to, it starts to get stupid. Multiple GPUs typically cannot share texture RAM. As for workload, well, it's basically harder to coordinate two things than one. You need to merge the results somehow, distribute the work without completely screwing it up... it's a mess, simply put. Not impossible, and surely easier to manipulate on the game side than by the driver, but still a mess.
May I ask, why does everyone take this as fact?
Its still amazing to me how little we know and can confirm
How does Nintendo even pull this off
Emily Rogers has a good track record.
May I ask, why does everyone take this as fact?
Emily Rogers has a good track record.
She also leaked Miiverse on the 3DS.How? She vaguely leaked that there would be a new Paper Mario game. Outside of that, she doesn't have much of a track record and has been wrong many many times.
How? She vaguely leaked that there would be a new Paper Mario game. Outside of that, she doesn't have much of a track record and has been wrong many many times.
How? She vaguely leaked that there would be a new Paper Mario game. Outside of that, she doesn't have much of a track record and has been wrong many many times.
Could you elaborate on why you don't think it will be used for high end upgrades? The way I see it, they could essentially release one SCD per generation which acts as the "pro"/Neo/Scorpio version of their console, except instead of having to replace your old console you simply buy an add-on for your existing console
Just want to point out that the Paper Mario rumor originated from Japan/2chan due to recruiting info back in 2015, not Emily or the other usual rumor suspects.
Her contacts are well placed. You can doubt the information if you like, but it wouldn't be the safe side to be on.
May I ask, why does everyone take this as fact?
Had a lengthy chat with Emily today, and she shared some information with me on all the rumor talk going on recently. Those thinking she is making stuff up for attention or that is she holding a carrot in front of you for laughs are wrong. Her sources are legit, and the claims are backed by several sources. She is sharing the information she has and is clearing the air of misinformation. It isn't being shared for attention.
She did say I could share this small bit with you: "Nvidia is involved with Nintendo's future hardware."
To be noted that Emily shared her info and sources for this also with NateDrake who confirmed in this thread that she has legit sources for this info.
Edit:
Forgive my ignorance, but what are NateDrake's credentials? I'm not doubting him, but I would like to know why he is considered a trustworthy source.
In an ideal world but this is nintendo.Just make sure the NX console is more powerful than the PS4K... at least.
Just make sure the NX console is more powerful than the PS4K... at least.
Just make sure the NX console is more powerful than the PS4K... at least.
So is Nvidia working on both the console & the handheld? Because we heard one report about Nvidia helping with the NX Handheld.