|
Watched Around the World in 80 Days...
(03-17-2011, 04:53 PM)
|
Originally Posted by JWong:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 04:56 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Giriath_89:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 04:57 PM)
|
Quote:
|
|
Banned
(03-17-2011, 05:00 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Giriath_89:
The current issue at Fukushima is with the transfer pools near the reactors. They are much smaller and contain much less fuel.
Last edited by mclaren777; 03-17-2011 at 05:07 PM.
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:01 PM)
|
Originally Posted by FlashFlooder:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:02 PM)
|
You guys weren't kidding when you were talking about Kaku going pretty alarmist.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540...30567#42130567 He says to use the Chernobyl option and entomb the entire site |
|
I'm mad as hell but this sandwich is delicious
(03-17-2011, 05:05 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Giriath_89:
It's fucking depressing. |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:06 PM)
|
Originally Posted by mclaren777:
Could you give us some insight into this Flood? Where are the spent fuel pools located in your plant, and in other plants operating in the US?
Last edited by Giriath_89; 03-17-2011 at 05:15 PM.
|
|
Banned
(03-17-2011, 05:10 PM)
|
Quote:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:10 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Giriath_89:
The Mark I is really not a very safe design, IMO. In fact it was banned in the US shortly after they started building them. |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:11 PM)
|
Originally Posted by mclaren777:
|
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(03-17-2011, 05:11 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Hari Seldon:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:12 PM)
|
Originally Posted by mclaren777:
That article is wrong. 3 of the 6 units were in a refueling outage at the time, one of them was also switching to recycled fuel. I would bet a paycheck that there are rods in those pools. Unless they're not counting Units 4,5,6 as "damaged" reactors. Which, at that point, is just playing with words. |
|
Banned
(03-17-2011, 05:14 PM)
|
Originally Posted by FlashFlooder:
Aren't you two saying the same thing? |
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(03-17-2011, 05:17 PM)
|
Originally Posted by JWong:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:18 PM)
|
Quote:
That's not the case, at least for units 4,5,6. |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:18 PM)
|
Originally Posted by FlashFlooder:
Those politicians should know that, and they probably do. Saying it will just make them look responsible in the eyes of the ignorant and frightened. I wish politics had a more scientific approach to social concern, but then it probably wouldn't be politics, just science. If this were done, I believe it would be much easier to observe and discern what creates profit in safety and health, and what creates profit in money. Instead we measure health in revenue streams... |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:22 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Giriath_89:
|
|
Banned
(03-17-2011, 05:26 PM)
|
Used Nuclear Fuel Storage at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
(Last updated 3/16/11) Key Facts Used nuclear fuel at the Fukushima-Daiichi plant is stored in seven pools (one at each reactor and a shared pool) and in a dry container storage facility (containing nine casks.) Sixty percent of the used fuel on site is stored in the shared pool, in a building separated from the reactor buildings; 34 percent of the used fuel is distributed between the six reactor fuel storage pools, and the remaining 6 percent is stored in the nine dry storage containers. Used fuel pools are robust concrete and steel structures designed to protect the fuel from even the most severe events. Pools are designed with systems to maintain the temperature and level of the water sufficient to provide cooling and radiation shielding. The water level in a used fuel pool typically is 16 feet or more above the top of the fuel assemblies. The used fuel pools at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors are located at the top of the reactor building for ease of handling during refueling operations. The used fuel pools are designed so that the water in the pool cannot drain down as a result of damage to the piping or cooling systems. The pools do not have drains in the sides or the floor of the pool structure. The only way to rapidly drain down the pool is to have structural damage of the walls or the floor. As of mid-day March 15, there is no evidence to date that this has occurred. What Could Happen During an Accident? The systems that cool and maintain water levels in the pools are designed to withstand severe events. If these systems are unable to function, the heat generated by the used fuel would result in a slow increase in the temperature of the spent fuel pool water. The operating temperature of the pools is typically around 40 degrees C or 100 degrees F (the boiling point for water is 100 C or 212 F). This slow increase in temperature will result in an increased evaporation rate. Rapid evaporation of the water will not occur. Exact evaporation rates would depend on the amount of used fuel in the pool and how long it has cooled. The rate at which the pool water level would decrease (due to evaporation or mild boiling) in the absence of cooling system function would not be expected to lower water levels by more than a few percent per day. Given that there is approximately 16 feet of water above the used fuel assemblies, operators would have a few weeks to find another way to add water to the pools before the fuel would become exposed. For example, water could easily be added using a fire hose. If the water level decreases below the top of the fuel assembly, oxidation of the zirconium cladding could occur. This oxidation could result in some hydrogen generation. The rate of hydrogen generation depends on the temperature of the fuel assembly, with hotter temperatures leading to higher hydrogen generation rates. However, only the fuel assemblies with the least cooling time would be susceptible to this oxidation and the temperature of the fuel assemblies decreases exponentially with cooling time. Even if the water level in the pools was to decrease sufficiently so that the fuel were exposed to air, the same level of overheating that can occur in a reactor accident would not occur in the used fuel pool because the used fuel assemblies in the pool are cooler than the assemblies in the reactor. It is highly unlikely that used fuel temperatures could reach the point where melting could occur, although some damage to the cladding cannot be ruled out. The likelihood of cladding damage, as with hydrogen generation, decreases substantially with temperature and cooling time. There has been some speculation that, if the used fuel pool were completely drained, the zirconium cladding might ignite and a “zirconium fire” might occur. At the surface of the used fuel pool, the gamma dose rate from radiation emanating off the used fuel assemblies typically is less than 2 millirem per hour. If the water level decreases, the gamma radiation level would increase substantially. This increase would be noticed at the radiation monitors near the reactor buildings. |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:27 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Leonsito:
^
Quote:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:27 PM)
|
Originally Posted by LuCkymoON:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:28 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Leonsito:
|
|
Sony is POO
(03-17-2011, 05:29 PM)
|
Originally Posted by davepoobond:
Serious question. But what about microwaves (radiation) being sent out from actual microwaves? |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:29 PM)
|
Originally Posted by FlashFlooder:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:30 PM)
|
Originally Posted by LuCkymoON:
Originally Posted by FlashFlooder:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:31 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Hari Seldon:
Originally Posted by JWong:
|
|
(03-17-2011, 05:31 PM)
|
Originally Posted by kamorra:
My state runs out of geothermic energy. I worked there. The security risks for the population are immense! |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:32 PM)
|
Originally Posted by JWong:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:33 PM)
|
Originally Posted by LuCkymoON:
I like the picture with the random canned goods, as if they held a quick canned food drive before they left or a bunch of the troops just threw together some cash and hit the commissary. I'm glad we're (the US) able to provide some help in all this. Same friend who linked me to the flickr set randomly the other night went door to door in his neighborhood and got people to donate $120 to JP red cross (by giving them the url, not taking the cash himself). |
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:33 PM)
|
Originally Posted by JWong:
|
|
Member
(03-17-2011, 05:33 PM)
|
Originally Posted by BronzeWolf:
I wish more people realized this. I'd rather live near a nuke plant than ANY chemical, coal, or even your geothermic plant. |