|
Member
(03-14-2012, 05:01 AM)
|
#154
What is the big point that I'm missing that means that friends shouldn't use it in passing as a joke? |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 05:07 AM)
|
#156
Different people have different dating strategies, and it's clear that there's some tendencies for gender differences in that as well. But if a person is happy with the results of that strategy then why should they change it?
That said, a guy just can't tie a red bow to his wide dick, stick it out the window of his expensive car and expect women to chase after it like a color guard. The article tries to paint women in the most shallow light possible and their decision process still comes off as far more sophisticated than just looking at the face and the body. |
|
underwear police
(03-14-2012, 05:15 AM)
|
#159
Not just in the past now. The double standard surrounding female promiscuity still plagues so called liberal and progressive circles, otherwise the response about the Sandra Fluke bullying wouldn't have been about how she's not a slut she's an educated respectable woman, it would have been "what if she is, who the fuck cares." But there is still a stigma against women fucking all they please and enjoying it, and that's embodied in the word slut. So excuse me if I couldn't give a fuck less about people using it in their smaller inner circles as a joke, as that's not really a signal to me that the word is losing its power. I'm not saying they can't either just that I don't consider it much of a gauge on the word honestly when you still have incidents like this.
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 05:16 AM)
|
#160
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 05:27 AM)
|
#161
I have no idea what shadow is saying, but I'm not following him or even giving an opinion on his opinion. My comment was separate. |
|
(03-14-2012, 05:28 AM)
|
#162
Fair. I guess that point is better phrased in there are a lot of people out there that look very different and everyone is gonna have different tastes. It's just similar to the personality thing. There are just so many combinations, finding a person you are highly compatible with just seems to less likely than finding one. That's why it takes a good amount of effort. I'm quickly coming to the conclusion that it really just isn't worth the effort. I meet enough people that are fine, but there are very few who are actually worth putting in the effort required by a significant relationship.
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 05:31 AM)
|
#163
I didn't particularly enjoy this article until the end:
Originally Posted by Cracked:
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 07:18 AM)
|
#164
The problem is that "slut" is a derogative term, used to insult whenever you are promiscuous, or fuck even just a bit sexually active. And shadowsdarknes knows it is, otherwise he wouldn't be all like "I would never call that to their faces though". And as long as being a slut carries the negative connotations it currently does, of course you're not gonna see many women being open about sex. Not a native English speaker so I'm just treating "slut" like the spanish equivalent |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 07:28 AM)
|
#166
I repeat - I don't even use the word. That doesn't mean that I think others shouldn't be able to (but not derogatively). Either way, a word is as its intent. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:16 AM)
|
#168
How does the slut tangent relate to the article? I'm missing the connection because shallowness doesn't necessarily imply sluttiness. |
|
underwear police
(03-14-2012, 08:18 AM)
|
#169
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:27 AM)
|
#173
I've always heard that women talk about a bunch of sexual things together, and always gleaned that women talk about EVERYTHING when it comes to sex (some claimed that they're worse than guys in that regard), so I never really linked it to deviant behavior. From whom do you get shit - I wouldn't expect other women, so men?
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:28 AM)
|
#174
Originally Posted by Devolution:
haha I thought it was obvious that I wasn't serious because.. well come on that would just be ridiculous right? But now i'm starting to wonder... (not talk about it, i mean get shit about it) |
|
underwear police
(03-14-2012, 08:33 AM)
|
#175
Haha. But seriously I think I'd have more of a preference about it if I had fucked more guys. Looks kind of don't mean shit if it's just going to be inside of me anyway.
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:37 AM)
|
#176
makes sense, but I feel like a lot of girls would want it to actually look... nice isn't the right word.. good? and maybe that would make them feel a little more comfortable. Because there IS such thing as an ugly dick. |
|
underwear police
(03-14-2012, 08:39 AM)
|
#177
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:41 AM)
|
#179
Not a big deal, but when it has a weird shape, well, you gotta do some stuff differently |
|
underwear police
(03-14-2012, 08:42 AM)
|
#180
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:48 AM)
|
#183
Quote:
that just sounds unpleasant.. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:53 AM)
|
#184
There have been many times that a girl was having trouble with something heavy and I tried to be a gentleman and offer my assistance. They seem somewhat concerned because the shit is apparently so heavy but then I just pick it up and handle it perfectly fine and they go "oh.. okay" in a surprised/impressed tone. This has happened many, many times. Can you honestly tell me that'd happen if I were 6'? I do have a light build, but I don't think that's it at all. There is a height-related subconscious estimation going on there, and it's more influential than you might think. There have been plenty of studies on the issue and the results are always very clear. A shorter man simply has to "earn his way" more than a taller man. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 08:56 AM)
|
#185
I don't think anyone from Gen Y really cares if women dish about dongs. But some people might pretend to be offended if they think it makes them look good.
Last edited by SapientWolf; 03-14-2012 at 08:59 AM.
|
|
underwear police
(03-14-2012, 09:00 AM)
|
#186
Actually we established it's more dudes being butthurt about their own peens or something.
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 09:23 AM)
|
#187
I think most of the backlash and discomfort over the issue comes from the old idea that women aren't supposed to enjoy sex as much as men do. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 09:30 AM)
|
#188
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 09:41 AM)
|
#189
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 09:51 AM)
|
#190
There's great discomfort among certain demographics about females talking about sex in general, and the Threatened Dick Theorem isn't broad enough to cover the full spectrum. It's a character judgement, and, to try to tie it into the article, it may seem shallow to the people being offended. |
|
am I an eager baby bird?
am I a cute baby bunny? (03-14-2012, 09:56 AM)
|
#191
It depends on who the audience is. Girls dishing with girls about someone's butt, or someone with a wrist thick todge won't be given a second thought if it's girls. But if it's mixed company, someone might be made uncomfortable, the same if it's guys talking about the particulars of a woman's perfectly upturned nipples, or large anti-gravity breasts. You would see him called a pig, just light you might have a woman get slut-shamed for her sexuality making someone nervous. Both sides get shamed for having sexual thoughts, it's only that women aren't supposed to like sex, and men are thought to like sex too much.
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 10:13 AM)
|
#192
From a bi point of view, other girls don't get in defense mode so quick when you talk about their boobies. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 11:47 AM)
|
#194
How could anyone not like freckles? |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 12:25 PM)
|
#196
I think 'shallow' is the wrong way to think of it. It doesn't indicate a problem or a failure on our parts(men or women) to be attracted to the things we are biologically wired to be attracted to. Also, women's programmed attractions is a little more complex, but that doesn't necessarily indicated that they are less shallow or more above their instincts. A common modern short-hand is the 'gold digger', but there are actual evolutionary reasons for women to be attracted to money and power(differently than men). Confidence, 'bad boys', etc. are part of that same biological suite. That's just them listening to their genes same as we do when we double-take to assess a Hot Chick. There's not necessarily anything wrong with any of that(although, we are still responsible for our actions, of course).
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 12:50 PM)
|
#197
There is hope yet! Its easier to have sex standing up etc if you are around the same height, so tall guys lose out on that one. Its also nice to be able to hold hands, kiss, dance with your partner without causing them back strain. You shorter guys have it fair easier in that regard.
|
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 01:02 PM)
|
#198
But at least I can reach stuff. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 01:14 PM)
|
#199
On the flip side, do I complain about weighing 55-60kg and not having any muscle? Nope, because I could go to a gym and get some. Its on me. Take the example earlier in the thread, he had a fat friend who would only go for super hot girls and then not date any avarage ones. |
|
Member
(03-14-2012, 01:35 PM)
|
#200
|