|
Member
(03-29-2012, 08:49 PM)
|
#151
I think joke thread titles are fine, personally. The Warriors Orochi 3 one was fucking clever.
The MGS4 thread title is a total camel, though. |
|
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 09:05 PM)
|
#152
I'd request OTs to be ctrl-f friendly as well, so not being completely made of images.
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 09:15 PM)
|
#153
this new direction is pretty good and appreciated;
bur would you please also come up with some names for the sections? Gaming, community, off-topic, community is pretty stale! |
|
bish gets all the credit :)
(03-29-2012, 09:18 PM)
|
#154
Here's the template I usually use Code:
Publisher: Developer: Director: Platform: Genre: Rating: Players: Price: Release Date: |
|
Junior Member
(03-29-2012, 10:15 PM)
|
#155
Sounds good i am ok with this...
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 10:19 PM)
|
#156
Moving stale OTs to a community forum is brilliant, imo.
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 10:35 PM)
|
#157
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 10:56 PM)
|
#158
I am fine supporting this. However, I do wish that these rules were established before my thread was used as the final scapegoat. For the record, there was no intent to market the title in any regard. We were trying to offer gaf information that is not available elsewhere, which appears to be a misconception here. Looks like that wasn't something desirable.
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 11:16 PM)
|
#159
|
|
Member
(03-29-2012, 11:37 PM)
|
#160
The formatting was all wrong. It was late and therefore rushed. We got tunnel vision and didn't foresee the end result. It was more about getting it out there. I put effort into my formatting using the little tools available for separating text. But in my head, those two posts weren't that long or bothersome. Like I said, tunnel vision. I am only disappointed in how it was handled except for some great help I did receive. A couple fans of a game got carried away and made a mistake. I was told about the complaints and basically said "oh shit." I was then in my opinion insulted when I had no ill intentions and was being receptive to the complains. It then took 5 minutes to pastebin and get things to one post. What was wrong were the accusations of marketing and that we were c+p from elsewhere. I wrote all that DMC3:SE content myself so there was zero c+p from this fictitious wiki that people were citing. Nobody even bothered to read it before making accusations. Anyway, the change will stop fans from making the same mistake. |
|
(03-30-2012, 12:56 AM)
|
#161
I want my name back this isn't funny anymore.
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 01:31 AM)
|
#162
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 03:05 AM)
|
#163
I didn't know it was possible for a forum to jump the shark
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 04:08 AM)
|
#165
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 05:49 AM)
|
#166
thanks for fixing the formatting of the community subforum tabs. looks good now.
|
|
erotic butter maelstrom
(03-30-2012, 06:00 AM)
|
#167
The new tabs look really good. Glad you guys didn't go with the obnoxious bright orange highlight that a few people suggested.
edit - meant to type this in the OT sticky, oops.
Last edited by Snuggler; 03-30-2012 at 06:03 AM.
|
|
Licorice-flavoured booze?
(03-30-2012, 06:46 AM)
|
#168
I'm not sure of this has been asked but are these new guidelines for just game specific OTs or hardware OTs as well?
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 06:50 AM)
|
#169
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 08:19 AM)
|
#170
So I really want to know what that guy with the Zero avatar thinks about this.
That sounds like a horrible reason and exactly the kind of things that we should hopefully see less of.
Last edited by Ledsen; 03-30-2012 at 08:23 AM.
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(03-30-2012, 10:02 AM)
|
#171
thank the lord on the OT guidelines. i'll pour one out for the memory of the MGS4/AssCreed topics
|
|
Junior Member
(03-30-2012, 10:43 AM)
|
#172
Oops, wrong thread.
*deleted* |
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 11:11 AM)
|
#173
![]() Dem razor sharp tabs. Looks great! And I agree: OTs without TT are really boring.. |
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 01:37 PM)
|
#174
Yeah, that was the only "mega-thread" that I liked. It was so neat and well-organized that the number of posts weren't even bothersome. The disarray of pictures in the AssCreed thread and walls of text in the DMC one just hurt my eyes, but the MGS4 one had it down.
Still, the good structure of the MGS4 thread is capable of being condensed into one post (U3 |OT|), so it's not a huge loss. |
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 03:14 PM)
|
#176
|
|
Dot Hacked
(03-30-2012, 04:14 PM)
|
#177
Wouldn't it be better better to have the "|OT|" part the first part of a thread title instead of going after the game title? I guess uniformness would be broken abit when |OT2| & ups came into play. >.<;
Least I dun gotta worry about |
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 06:58 PM)
|
#178
I for one will miss the OT titles of old. They were part of why I liked seeing OTs in the first place.
|
|
Member
(03-30-2012, 11:40 PM)
|
#179
I'm a big fan of these guidelines and feel that they were much-needed. There is one that I think should be bent a little, though. This one:
For big name, big budget games I can see why this makes sense and I'm all for it. On the other side though, for smaller games made by GAF members I don' tthink it should necessarily apply. For exmaple, I can't of a good reason why Feep or Jocchan shouldn't be able to make the Sequence or Dudebro threads, respectively. Obviously you don't want people joining just to promote their game, but for long-time members with good reputations I wouldn't see an issue with letting them make their own OT's. |
|
Member
(03-31-2012, 02:11 AM)
|
#180
|
|
Member
(03-31-2012, 11:57 PM)
|
#181
|
|
Banned
(04-05-2012, 01:14 AM)
|
#182
|
|
Member
(04-05-2012, 02:22 AM)
|
#183
|