|
the window was open, he lost his 'cock
(04-28-2012, 02:18 AM)
|
#1201
|
|
|
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 02:23 AM)
|
#1202
The capabilities of these things are really vague though. |
|
Became a moderator just to tag himself.
(04-28-2012, 02:24 AM)
|
#1203
They have huge ass time machines, can snuff out stars, and can teleport 100 parsecs (~330 light years) almost instantly. In a tactical sense, they can go from rest to approaching the speed of light in less time than it takes for you to blink. It's not the Federation (or any other faction) that had the timeship though. If you were going to pull random people from each universe then you may as well just say "lol Q snaps his fingers and the empire disappears" (assuming the empire doesn't shoot him with a musket).
Last edited by ThoseDeafMutes; 04-28-2012 at 02:26 AM.
|
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 02:27 AM)
|
#1204
Quote:
|
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 02:33 AM)
|
#1207
no, didn't bring that into the discussion at all. If we include the federation timecops, it becomes ludicrously lopsided.
That was just a fun bit of trivia in regards to Trek "as a whole" being the low man on the totem pole. If you include the Relativity and it's ilk (which operate all along the timeline), Trek is very advanced- though I'd still give the edge to Timelords and Daleks. |
|
card-carrying scientician
(04-28-2012, 02:35 AM)
|
#1208
I dunno, the Time Lords were actually at "war" with the Daleks who have never seemed that impressive in terms of firepower and destructive ability. I mean, yeah, they're strong, but the Daleks aren't orders of magnitude stronger then Wars or Trek
|
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 02:37 AM)
|
#1209
oh man, don't start this argument lol. Trek vs. Wars is hard enough.
|
|
I'm glad Grandpa porked a Chinese Muslim
(04-28-2012, 02:40 AM)
|
#1210
|
|
Became a moderator just to tag himself.
(04-28-2012, 02:42 AM)
|
#1211
I actually can't take any of the classic Dr Who villains seriously because they look so incredibly dumb and their list of abilities, immunities to weapons and so on reads like something a 9 year old came up with while god-modding in a forum-RPG. Nuh uh you can't shoot my daleks because they're immune to bullets! And bombs! And everything else! And they have super death rays that destroy everything you have! And they can blow up time! And they can fly!
|
|
card-carrying scientician
(04-28-2012, 02:45 AM)
|
#1212
|
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 02:48 AM)
|
#1213
Might as well argue Star Trek vs. Marvel Comics. (and I say this knowing that someone, somewhere will post that pic of Gladiator threatening TOS Enterprise) |
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 03:08 AM)
|
#1215
|
|
Member
(04-28-2012, 03:40 AM)
|
#1218
AND WHERE DO YOU STAND, SIR??
edit: rereading the last few pages i don't think I can give Lonewolf_92 enough credit.The Doomsday machine episode from TOS is a really, REALLY powerful argument for shield strength. That thing was basically the death star, and TOS enterprise tanked several shots from it. Any argument that TIE fighters or Slave 1 have higher power output than whatever that is, is null and void.
Last edited by Manmademan; 04-28-2012 at 03:48 AM.
|
|
Online Ho Champ
(04-28-2012, 03:47 AM)
|
#1219
honestly neither has warhammer 40k's and some of it lost for generations, and i still think they'd rape SW and ST. I mean come one a living city planet? the moon sized death ..star ship... , starwars is complete cheat mode. Not to mention when a captain hails the super star destroyer darth vader is going to choke him ....thru the screen.... SW's technology fits whatever story they want to tell or setting they want to make, ST's tech is a bit more constrained to telling a more down to earth story (space exploration/politics) in a futuristic background.
|