|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:48 AM)
|
#701
|
|
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:48 AM)
|
#702
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:49 AM)
|
#703
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:51 AM)
|
#704
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:53 AM)
|
#705
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 03:00 AM)
|
#707
You could easily blame our #1 problem, the goalie in that series. In this game, bryz stood on his head and we couldn't get it done. None of those goals were his fault this game. The noticeable things: - can't get it out of the zone - can't sustain any pressure - players don't seem into it/ready it's not the bruins series where it was: - LOL GOALTENDING |
|
go home you're drunk
(05-07-2012, 03:12 AM)
|
#708
Elliot only faces 18 shots and still fucks it up.
He would have got lighten the fuck up if he was playing behind our defense, we allow the most shots on net. And yeah I wouldn't be surprised if more than half of the teams in the league turn into a trap team for next season, this is a league of copy cats and seeing how the last 4 teams in the playoffs are trap teams, more coaches will try to implement the system, especially the crappy ones. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 03:36 AM)
|
#710
Full credit to the Kings for getting past the top two seeds, but they've been lucky that their lineup is healthy. A healthy Daniel Sedin would've made a difference, as would have Halak. Was Pietrangelo 100%?
It also makes me wonder about Elliott's play. During the season perhaps he was more rested and had less pressure on him with a safety net in Halak, but when Halak got injured he needed to be the guy and couldn't be. Though I can't compare Elliott to Schneider, I wonder how the latter will perform if his safety net is traded (Luongo) as well. It makes a big difference to start one big game and then have a few days off, as opposed to big game after big game (though Schneider did really well in Games 3-5 vs. LA).
Last edited by Lone_Prodigy; 05-07-2012 at 03:40 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 04:30 AM)
|
#711
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:20 AM)
|
#712
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:23 AM)
|
#713
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:24 AM)
|
#714
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:36 AM)
|
#716
I don't like that the hate is coming from Canadian hockey fans mostly. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:39 AM)
|
#717
I think the feeling that the hate is coming mostly from Canadian hockey fans is that Canada feels more strongly about an American team moving (back) to Canada. Makes sense, I think?
|
![]() (05-07-2012, 05:48 AM)
|
#718
|
|
RIP Vinnie
(05-07-2012, 06:09 AM)
|
#720
I don't think the BoG will approve it. The team will continue to hemorrhage money and we'll be in the same spot three years from now. Why leave money on the table that you could pick up in Quebec? It makes no sense. Not to mention, it's not a sure deal Glendale approves it either by any means. Then you have the whole Goldwater Institute thing...
Oy vey. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 06:47 AM)
|
#722
Winnipeg had the infrastructure ready to take the Thrashers, so that's fine with me. Quebec? No arena (yet), and where's that ownership group? If Phoenix can keep their team, good for them. If they can't, too bad. But this "x city deserves a team more than y city" mentality is really immature and stupid. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 06:54 AM)
|
#723
Canadians hate Phoenix because they know that the team should/could be Canadian instead. Americans are more "meh" because they might dislike Phoenix, but losing Phoenix would mean losing an "American" team to Canada. Not sure if that argument is any good/if such nationalism exists in hockey, but it could certainly be a reason for your perception that Canadians seem to dislike Phoenix more than Americans? |
|
RIP Vinnie
(05-07-2012, 06:54 AM)
|
#724
Let me assure you no one here gives a flying fuck. In fact, most of us would probably rather see Phoenix move to a market that would actually support the team. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 07:01 AM)
|
#725
I was just trying to make sense of this. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 07:13 AM)
|
#727
I don't know any Canadiens that hate that the Yotes are in Phoenix and not in a Canadian city, I just know people that think the team should be relocated to a city that will support it and deserves it whether it be in Canada or the US, I could give 2 fucks, Quebec has just always been the most popular option.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 08:56 AM)
|
#732
Anyone wan't to take a Shanaban guess? Is Giroux a star? Yeah => 0 games |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:26 AM)
|
#733
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:43 AM)
|
#734
Oh, so the reason Giroux got so angry was because Brodeur clearly played the puck outside the trapezoid but the refs let it go as a birthday present for Marty.
Taking that frustration out on Zubrus was really dumb.
Last edited by Curufinwe; 05-07-2012 at 10:46 AM.
|
|
Future Juri Player
(05-07-2012, 01:14 PM)
|
#739
Larry Robinson has the Flyers figured out... without Pronger and Mezaros .... Flyers Defense is dog shit while Byrzgalov remains inconsistent
The remaining teams in the Playoffs have better Defensmen and better Goalies and that appears to be the case for 2012's playoffs success in the end zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
|
Amir0x Remembers
(05-07-2012, 01:24 PM)
|
#741
I haven't looked, but what's their attendance been like in the playoffs? Surely it's a bit better than the regular season.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 01:26 PM)
|
#742
|
|
Not bitter, just unsweetened
(05-07-2012, 01:37 PM)
|
#743
|
|
Banned
(05-07-2012, 01:43 PM)
|
#744
|
|
go home you're drunk
(05-07-2012, 02:04 PM)
|
#746
Probably a warning since his team is on the brink of elimination.
|
|
(05-07-2012, 02:17 PM)
|
#747
Besides, how does he go from being a month or two away from a deal last week to all of a sudden having a deal in place? Smells fishy. Even if this deal does somehow go through, this same shit will start all over again in a few years when his investors bail because they can't turn a profit. Yes. Looks especially shady when the league is obviously doing everything it can to keep the team from moving. No. The NHL makes new owners sign non-relocation agreements when they take over a team. |
|
(05-07-2012, 02:34 PM)
|
#749
7 years I believe.
Edit: Its obviously different in cases like Atlanta where there was no buyers willing to keep them in Atlanta. The league can waive the non-relocation aspects in that type of situation. They weren't going to force TNSE to keep the team in Atlanta for 7 years before moving them to Winnipeg.
Last edited by Marvie_3; 05-07-2012 at 02:37 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:36 PM)
|
#750
|