|
Member
(05-07-2012, 09:50 PM)
|
#4851
Unrelated to moneybags, a Nebraska fan asks Leach: Was 70 really necessary?
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 09:57 PM)
|
#4852
http://dev.chuckoliver.net/2012/05/forget-rumors-reasons-why-fsu-would-never-join-the-big-12/ |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:27 PM)
|
#4853
My favorite fact is that we were the ONLY school to have all (19) of our NCAA teams qualify for post-season play this year. Word. P.S. We have a new WR starting this year (Marvin Bracy) that will probably miss part of the summer practice because he will most likely qualify for the London Olympics. 17 year old kid, and he set the fastest time in the world in the 100m in 2011. He is going to absolutely burn past everybody else's cornerbacks once he gets on the field.
Last edited by StrikerObi; 05-07-2012 at 11:34 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:31 PM)
|
#4854
We haven't lost the conference in swimming since the 80s, and I believe our women's track team is currently #1 in the nation.
Last edited by ConfusingJazz; 05-07-2012 at 10:34 PM.
|
|
(05-07-2012, 11:10 PM)
|
#4856
|
|
Banned
(05-07-2012, 11:18 PM)
|
#4857
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Banned
(05-07-2012, 11:22 PM)
|
#4858
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by bluemax; 05-07-2012 at 11:25 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 11:25 PM)
|
#4859
Quote:
|
|
Steroid-era GAF poster
(05-07-2012, 11:28 PM)
|
#4860
|
|
I call 'em "death hugs"
(05-07-2012, 11:37 PM)
|
#4861
- USC's record since 1904 (of which, if I recall, USC has sent at least one athlete every Olympics): 122 gold, 76 silver, 60 bronze. Winning at least 1 gold every summer Olympics since 1912. - Texas came in 8th in golds in one Olympics? that's cool. If USC were its own nation, it would be ranked 8th all-time in golds. - Coliseum, baby |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 11:40 PM)
|
#4862
We have 117 total medals (67/32/18). Also, 2008 was our worst Olympics since 1992. We only had 5 world records and 1 Olympic record as well. And we got a silver in bobsleigh in Vancouver! SUCK ON THAT!
Last edited by ConfusingJazz; 05-07-2012 at 11:42 PM.
|
|
Banned
(05-07-2012, 11:41 PM)
|
#4863
Yawn.
Quote:
We had 10 Gold Medalists in 2008, and won a total of 21 medals.
Last edited by bluemax; 05-07-2012 at 11:44 PM.
|
|
Steroid-era GAF poster
(05-07-2012, 11:44 PM)
|
#4865
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 11:44 PM)
|
#4866
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 11:47 PM)
|
#4868
|
|
Steroid-era GAF poster
(05-08-2012, 06:01 AM)
|
#4871
aaaand the Lonhorns are officially on the board for the Fullmer Cup!!
http://tablet.kxan.com/10023/4165638/ |
|
Member
(05-08-2012, 06:04 AM)
|
#4872
That is nothing. Might even be a night in jail to make them think about it and then let them go with no charges. But that would probably cause a controversy. Unless some horrible facts are not yet know, sounds like Class C Disturbing the peace misdemeanors for them.
|
|
Steroid-era GAF poster
(05-08-2012, 06:13 AM)
|
#4873
|
|
Banned
(05-08-2012, 06:14 AM)
|
#4874
|
|
First tragedy, then farce.
(05-08-2012, 02:23 PM)
|
#4877
|
|
Sailor Stevenson
(05-08-2012, 03:21 PM)
|
#4878
|
|
Member
(05-08-2012, 04:22 PM)
|
#4880
|
|
Member
(05-08-2012, 05:37 PM)
|
#4881
So enjoy the 13 team conference in 5 years SEC, because no way in hell does this end up without serious sanctions. |
|
Banned
(05-08-2012, 06:44 PM)
|
#4882
Since there was some mild conversation about Urbs being the "best" coach in the B1G on a couple of lists, how about we mock some coach rankings for the Pac 12!
Originally Posted by The Sporting News:
Originally Posted by Athlon:
Originally Posted by Ted Miller:
|
|
Banned
(05-08-2012, 07:01 PM)
|
#4884
I think that last years 3-9 campaign is fresh in peoples mind. That and I don't think people who don't follow the conference enough understand what Riley has been able to do at Oregon State.
|
|
Sailor Stevenson
(05-08-2012, 07:19 PM)
|
#4885
Kelly is clearly the best, and I'd put Leach a close second, I think Leach has done almost as much as Kelly with less to work with. Sark and Kiffin are both good too. Kiffin has surprisingly proven himself, though I still hope for an implosion.
I think Rich Rod will find his way up there too. Pac-12 is loaded coaching wise |
|
Member
(05-08-2012, 07:39 PM)
|
#4886
The academic arguments are also bunk. The Pac 12 didn't reject the 4 schools from the Big 12 over academics. The rejection occurred because Texas didn't want to join the package deal. Texas wants to preserve the Big 12. As for the four schools who left the Big 12: Nebraska is the first and only non-AAU member of the Big 10. Texas A&M/Mizzou were primarily brought in for market penetration, NOT ACADEMICS. Colorado was brought into the Pac, because their options are fairly limited. Louisville's main problem for the SEC is that they occupy an already occupied market. The ACC is the only conference that has truly made academics a square focus in expansion. It's also a reason why the ACC is occupying bitch status amongst the power conferences (the Big East is done as a power player. I've accepted mid-major status for Rutgers). Also, the only conference which actually has any way to derive benefit from having good schools is the Big 10 with their research consortium. The ACC version by comparison is weak. Academics only mean something when you are dealing with two equal propositions. |
|
Sailor Stevenson
(05-08-2012, 07:49 PM)
|
#4887
Nebraska was in the AAU when it joined the B1G. The AAU has been getting snobbier recently with some weird politics. Nebraska's removal from the AAU was by a couple votes, and 2 Big Ten schools, Michigan and Wisconsin, voted against Nebraska (WTF is up with that?) Regardless of that, Nebraska's academics are on a huge upswing even without the B1G, and that alone is going to dramatically accelerate the academics. Look at Penn State from when they joined the B1G until now. That'll be Nebraska in a decade or so |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(05-08-2012, 08:08 PM)
|
#4888
I mean, the research funding thing, that is partly due to Nebraska's function as a land grant university, but they put most of their money into agriculture, which is fine, but it does it at the detriment of the other sciences/fields. And not having faculty that aren't part of the National Academy is just sad. Get some qualified faculty, Huskers. And don't use your medical school as an excuse. Colorado's med school isn't part of CU's flagship campus, and we're still in the AAU. Penn State, although also a land grant campus, was a legit research university long before their invitation into the B1G. The comparison between the two is not the same. Of the lowest ranked BIG schools, US News and World Report ranked the lowest schools, Iowa, Michigan State and Indiana at 71. Nebraska is 96.
Last edited by ChiTownBuffalo; 05-08-2012 at 08:18 PM.
|
|
Sailor Stevenson
(05-08-2012, 10:12 PM)
|
#4889
Nebraska was moving up fast - over the previous decade Federal Research dollars had more than doubled, and amongst AAU institutions research, Nebraska experienced the 7th most growth (by percentage: 120%) from 98-2009. (And if you did count the Nebraska Med School, they tripled their research in the same time frame, also worth noting the Med School was administered by UNL until the 70s). And on top of that, UNL is building a huge new 233 acre Innovation Campus to further research and growth. Anyways, without any of the above, no way the Big Ten admits us. It's frustrating that two of those B1G members voted against Nebraska. We're certainly at the bottom of the AAU for now, but compared to 15-20 years ago, the school has undergone quite the transformation, and if mentioned, |
|
Member
(05-08-2012, 10:36 PM)
|
#4890
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:22 PM)
|
#4895
Reason I ask is I've got 2 job offers one staying here and one working for a startup company in Tampa. They pay about the same but if this startup takes off I would be in a very good position getting in on the ground floor. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(05-09-2012, 04:44 PM)
|
#4897
I've only been in Tampa due to hurricaines.
Strip clubs still stayed open. |
|
keeping Americuh safe
(05-09-2012, 04:45 PM)
|
#4898
Budget in about $1200/mo if you want a good apartment downtown. It's a semi-big city, and cost of living is going to be high. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:32 PM)
|
#4899
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:49 PM)
|
#4900
It really didn't matter. Nebraska was the most profitable program amongst the expansion candidates within the B1G's footprint. It fulfilled the "academic check mark" at the time, even though I'm sure the B1G Presidents knew full well they were going to vote them out of the AAU. It was a no-brainer of a move. If the AAU mark was really that important to the Big 10, they could have chosen some less profitable but more secure AAU program that was also drooling for the invite like Iowa State, Maryland, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, or Missouri. As for research moving up without the designation - I wouldn't look at as some minor setback stevenson. It is going to affect UNL's ability to win research grants from the feds. ChiTown is also right - Penn State was well regarded before they even joined the Big 10. They were in better shape before they joined the Big 10 than the shape Nebraska is in, during year one of joining the Big 10.
Quote:
Last edited by Sirpopopop; 05-09-2012 at 05:59 PM.
|