|
(05-08-2012, 11:54 PM)
|
#901
|
|
Junior Member
(05-09-2012, 12:15 AM)
|
#902
|
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 03:00 AM)
|
#903
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:03 AM)
|
#904
I kind of want them to do a XIII-3 just to see the huge backlash that would follow.
It would be like watching a train wreck in slow motion. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:14 AM)
|
#905
Pretty sure even SE isn't deluded enough to make FF XIII-3.
Though they did try to make people pay for XIV again... |
|
Banned
(05-09-2012, 03:16 AM)
|
#906
At least XIII-3 has a chance to be good and be released in a timely matter.
Can't say that for Versus. |
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 03:16 AM)
|
#907
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:17 AM)
|
#908
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:20 AM)
|
#909
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:22 AM)
|
#910
Or you could go with some clever joke about not having to pay for it for all those months but its too hard trying to joke about something so depressing. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:57 AM)
|
#911
If they were planning a 13-3, they had to have scrapped it when they saw 13-2 barely break 2 million worldwide.
|
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 04:11 AM)
|
#912
FFXIV has come a long way. People playing it now are more than willing to pay for it, so that must mean something right?
|
|
(05-09-2012, 04:24 AM)
|
#913
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:32 AM)
|
#914
Funny thing, my brother mention this game to me by title few months back. I looked at him fucking puzzled at what the hell he was talking about.
I honestly forgot about this game. I really don't know how they can bring attention back to this game and make us want it. Thats if they do something like metal gear rising. Just come back showing a video that they've been messing up and start showing something new that they are working on. |
|
Faster, stronger, smarter and has a wife who plays more games than you
(05-09-2012, 04:33 AM)
|
#915
Why on Earth would Square-Enix do this? I mean, seriously.
Making Versus into XV sends exactly one message to the world: we are too incompetent to make a real Final Fantasy XV. We are so desperate that we have to take a standalone title that's already associated with a different numbered FF and rebrand it six years after its announcement because otherwise we'll never release another new numbered entry. It's one thing to give it a new name to separate it from the stink of XIII, but trying to reposition this title as a new main-series title is only asking for trouble. Anyone who thinks this is a good plan should probably avoid weighing in on branding debates in the future. :P Just like literally every ambitious console title Square-Enix has developed since 2005. No, the franchise is collapsing due to about six years of constant poor-quality spinoffs, bad brand management, a style that's increasingly distant from the tastes of two out of three regions, and the poor critical reception of (soon to be) three consecutive main or near-main titles. |
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 04:41 AM)
|
#916
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:43 AM)
|
#917
|
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 04:48 AM)
|
#918
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:50 AM)
|
#919
Last edited by Gamer @ Heart; 05-09-2012 at 04:52 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:53 AM)
|
#920
These overreactions are palpable.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:53 AM)
|
#921
I'm certainly keeping my eye open for Square with FFXIV 2.0 but the first time I played XIV really left a bad taste in my mouth... (yes, I'm aware it's come along ways) BUT you can't compete against GW2 with no monthly fee.
If I did pay to play a game, pending on how their upgraded game play mechanics turn out in XIV 2.0, I'd consider that but certainly not XIV the way it is right now. It's a snooze fest for me. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:54 AM)
|
#922
Then again, perhaps Square Enix still made a profit on the game despite the low sales number. Perhaps 13-3 was always intended (as per the ending of the last game) and Square Enix is too stubborn to tell Toriyama "no" despite the lacklustre sales and disingenuous marketing. Perhaps Square Enix doesn't realize they're doing irreparable damage to their bread-and-butter Final Fantasy brand. |
|
Faster, stronger, smarter and has a wife who plays more games than you
(05-09-2012, 04:58 AM)
|
#923
If you want to build terrible word-of-mouth before your product is even out, a great way is to do something that you'd only do to try to trick people into paying your product extra attention in a way that's incredibly easy for them to find out about. (Seriously, renaming the game to XV is an incredibly dumb idea.) |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:05 AM)
|
#924
I honestly dont see general audiences reacting that way. You make them seem very fickle about something as minor as a name change. They barely know this game even exists and if its amazing, has great word of mouth and reviews, most will buy it regardless.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:09 AM)
|
#925
I still believe they renamed it.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:17 AM)
|
#926
Final Fantasy is not a mainstream brand. It might have been 15 years ago, but only because the mainstream had drastically different demographics. Even beyond dudebroification, a lot of people are simply unwilling or unable to accept that they are no longer the target audience because, gasp, they're 15 years older than they used to be. Final Fantasy XIII is zero parts more melodramatic or cheesier than FFX but it received infinitely more criticism for it. There will always exist a niche for the series here, but the western mainstream rejects anything with a hint of emotion or melodrama and sees right through any attempts at patronization. Square's real mistake has been streamlining the gameplay and RPG elements to cater to an audience that the actual content of the game precluded them from ever endearing. (I don't know what "bad brand management" even means or how it's separated from just publishing games that people don't like. Is it putting a Leona Lewis song on a commercial during the NBA All-Star game? That's S-E NA being tone-deaf, not any decision that Wada or Kitase or Nomura made. They've only released a handful of spinoffs in the past couple years, and I doubt anyone thinks 'less of the brand' because of cash-ins like The After Years.) |
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 05:19 AM)
|
#927
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:44 AM)
|
#928
At any rate, Square really needs to bring back the smaller games or have local teams work on downloadables. I think not having anyone who has shipped a game that was either not on a handheld or XIII/XIII-2 in the past few years is what is really hurting them right now. FF needs Kitase, Toriyama and co. to move on. |
|
Asleep in the Fantasy
(05-09-2012, 05:45 AM)
|
#929
There's DLC releasing this month that's "supposed" to resolve the ending. We'll see.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:48 AM)
|
#930
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:51 AM)
|
#931
Not gonna lie, I'd prefer 13-3 over Versus at this point. Hahaha. I actually rather enjoyed 13-2 in a guilty pleasure sort of way. It was hilarious, and terrible, and endearingly awful. And I liked Noel and Serah (never thought I could like Serah after 13).
And I definitely want to see a continuation to that ending. |
|
Warning: I think every modern Western game looks and plays the same.
(05-09-2012, 07:52 AM)
|
#932
I don't think Final Fantasy XIII-3, if ever exists, will be announced before the release of Versus XIII.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 08:04 AM)
|
#933
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 09:09 AM)
|
#934
I don't see the hubbub behind if they renamed it FFXV. I don't think the XIII moniker did them any good anywhere worldwide. The people who were going to buy Vesus would buy it regardless of the name but they might actually get back some more audience if they passed it off as mainline title. Even in the worst case scenario it's not like it could be any worse than FFXI and FFXIV being online games. I honestly don't think anything Versus could do right now could drastically shift the public perception of Square Enix or the Final Fantasy brand name at this point.
It's gotta come out some time next year though, right? This fall Wii U is going to come out and next year will be a lull period for PS3 so that would be a proper swan song there. If Versus launches past the release date of the PS4 would anyone care? I know Dragon Quest typically gets away with that, does anyone think Final Fantasy could? |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 09:31 AM)
|
#935
Even if it isn't in a position to come out towards the end of this year or next year, Square is probably going to rush it so that it meets that time frame. They've been able to release a big title every winter in Japan since 2009. If they can't get Versus out at the end of this year (in Japan), then they'll probably aim for early next year.
|
|
(05-09-2012, 03:03 PM)
|
#936
I think they might drop the XIII from the title, but no way they're going to rebrand an announced spinoff game to a mainline title.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:06 PM)
|
#937
Whether it would be called XV or not, the name needs to be changed to something other than "Versus XIII" though. If Type-0 can go through the change then so can Versus XIII. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:11 PM)
|
#938
I wonder if they could pack-in a short FFXIII-3 with Versus? In the manner they did FFX-2 and Last Mission?
I mean, the pitch would be: Here's this shiny new Final Fantasy, with a side-dish of the conclusion to the original FFXIII story. |
|
Junior Member
(05-09-2012, 03:22 PM)
|
#939
I may be generalizing heavily but the last time i remember a really delayed Final Fantasy we got the best 3D one of the lot; FFXII.
Here's hoping it's because they're hard at work retooling it as FFXV and for the WiiU ;) |
|
(05-09-2012, 03:29 PM)
|
#940
And if you consider FFXII the best of the lot it was in spite of the delays and poor production. The narrative goes to pieces about halfway through due to the production problems. |
|
(05-09-2012, 03:35 PM)
|
#942
Someone get that Japanese -> Latin dictionary away from Nomura or he'll call it Ultima Phantasia Contra Tredecim or some shit.
|
|
(05-09-2012, 03:45 PM)
|
#943
Could the game actually be cancelled at this point? Is there a possibility this could have actually happened?
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:56 PM)
|
#944
I have failed to see how FF13 is any more melodramatic than the Tales games, which are as popular here as they have ever been and great sellers abroad. In fact, JPNs RPGs are almost all the same. Heck, it used to be the norm, and a guilty pleasure at that. We are just seeing the Western style finally catching up and moving in different directions and that is eating away at the old demographics.
And I must stress once more that despite its weaker sales, FFXIII-2 was the highest PS3 seller last year in Japan. And lets not forget the DLC has been selling very well. I expect SE will make some kind of announcement at E3 about WW figures on it. |
|
Junior Member
(05-09-2012, 03:57 PM)
|
#945
Regardless of your opinion, i quite enjoyed it. Definitely gave the FF layout a shakeup for the best rather than using the same core battle mechanics since the NES days. :P |
|
(05-09-2012, 03:59 PM)
|
#946
Also, whether or not FFXIII's plot is melodramatic is secondary to the issue of FFXIII's plot being stupid.
Quote:
Big fish, small pond.
Quote:
Last edited by Pureauthor; 05-09-2012 at 04:01 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 03:59 PM)
|
#947
Also, being as melodramatic as a Tales game isn't a compliment. At all. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 04:04 PM)
|
#948
What I mean is that Tales games are finally getting some NA love and attention from Namco (facebook, etc). And sales are always very high for the titles in Japan.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 06:41 PM)
|
#949
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 06:42 PM)
|
#950
|