|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:19 PM)
|
#4901
I expect it to be a bit more, and the startup is somewhat nerve wrecking. It does have a billion dollars behind it as well as investors so in confident in it. If it doesn't workout I can always comeback, I think I would kick myself if I didn't try it.
|
|
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 05:27 PM)
|
#4902
I guess in this economy I'd just naturally favor the more established company that didn't require me to move so far away. But at your age if you have money to fall back on, or if you can move back in with family if it goes south, you should be okay. If you've never lived out of state it'd be a good experience for you. Also, from what I hear, Tampa is great.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 06:17 PM)
|
#4903
So your argument is that nothing matters in conference realignment except football? I'm not sure that is really true. Especially to a school who is competitive in so many sports.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 06:44 PM)
|
#4904
Other matters only matter so much, when the football part of the equation is equal. If the football part of the equation is not equal, then it is the only stake that matters. You would be hard pressed to find any move that violates the above rule. |
|
Sailor Stevenson
(05-09-2012, 07:29 PM)
|
#4910
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 07:41 PM)
|
#4912
The ACC lacks a really big name team to boost TV money. If Notre Dame ever does make the conference jump, then the ACC should do everything possible to get them.
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 08:24 PM)
|
#4918
|
|
Golden Domers are chickenshit!!
(05-09-2012, 08:45 PM)
|
#4920
|
|
(05-09-2012, 09:03 PM)
|
#4923
LOL! I've been to a book signing and it's not uncommon for them to use some sort of short form message so I'm sure he can come up with a meaning that's less offensive if someone comes calling, but that's amazing.
When I had Ready Player One signed, Ernie Cline signed it MTFBWY or something similarly Star Wars-y. |
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 09:18 PM)
|
#4924
|
|
Member
(05-09-2012, 11:30 PM)
|
#4929
Yes...it is pretty bad. $16 million per team after the ACC head office takes their cut...and that includes tier 3 rights. To put it in perspective the Big XII deal is worth nearly $21 million and that's without a conference championship game and doesn't include tier 3 rights in which most cases can be worth another 5-7 million per team. If an ACC team jumps to the Big XII they could make another $10 million plus more per year easily. This ACC deal is pretty laughable in comparison. |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 12:58 AM)
|
#4931
Yes, I get it. Teams with small fanbases didn't want to travel hundreds of miles for a shitty game. |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 02:01 AM)
|
#4932
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 02:06 AM)
|
#4933
|
|
First tragedy, then farce.
(05-10-2012, 03:46 AM)
|
#4934
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 04:37 AM)
|
#4938
You are missing my point. I wasn't saying that you can't make good money in Tier 3 rights, im saying the difference in available Tier 3 rights between the ACC and the Big 12 isn't going to be that large for most teams. FSU makes around 7 million in Tier 3 rights. If they moved to the Big 12 they could sell one football game against a really bad team, and a few basketball games against out of conference opponents. How much extra would that really be worth?
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 04:42 AM)
|
#4939
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 05:47 PM)
|
#4941
Tennessee Transfer DeAnthony Arnett can play for Michigan State in 2012
Glad this was allowed, especially after all the initial stonewalling Tennessee did. Also leaves me more confident in our passing game. |
|
Banned
(05-10-2012, 07:50 PM)
|
#4943
Lynn Swann started the whole players conducting the band thing! Who knew?
Quote:
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:24 PM)
|
#4944
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...layoff-hell-no
Quote:
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 10:45 PM)
|
#4945
I don't think the revenue for that deal has been announced, but it's believed to be for far less than what ESPN is paying Texas. On the other hand, OU fans (and UT fans) will actually be able to watch the network.
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 02:41 PM)
|
#4946
|
|
Sailor Stevenson
(05-11-2012, 02:49 PM)
|
#4947
1. B1G has a conference championship game. 2. Delaney is proposing the hybrid model. Top 6 eligible, take the top four conference champions. If not enough conference champions in top six, take the top non-conference champions. Defends conference champions while also keeping the top end of the rankings. Carry on |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 02:54 PM)
|
#4948
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 02:59 PM)
|
#4950
We'll see, the powers that be are already shitting their pants that they're losing the grasp of power that they have on the bowl arrangements and traditions that make the power brokers so rich. So a change to a final 4 and reworking the bowl tie ins is going to be enough for them to fret about. I don't really get a top 6 proposal.. I think the natural destination if you go beyond 4 is 8, but I think it'd change the game a bit too much for me... Maybe I'd warm up to it after we have the final 4 for a few years.
|