|
Banned
(05-11-2012, 07:41 AM)
|
#151
|
|
This sh!t needs to stop?
(05-11-2012, 07:41 AM)
|
#152
|
|
Purple Drazi
(05-11-2012, 07:42 AM)
|
#154
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:44 AM)
|
#155
I agree in that the political correctness of every day life is often very suffocating. Mainly though, I honestly detest these groups whom stand "in defense" of a particular issue or belief and are absolutely ruthless if you disagree. God help you if you're even a small celebrity and you make one slight remark about homosexuals, wear anything made with an animals fur, etc.
Obviously this argument is pretty moot though. But yes, I find it pretty insufferable when someone attacks another person for being ignorant or whatnot. You can't help how you feel, honestly. However, in such circumstances it's better to simply keep such opinions hidden. Yes, it shouldn't always be like that, but it's really for the best in almost any circumstance. |
|
formerly zmoney
(05-11-2012, 07:45 AM)
|
#156
Can you read? Where did it say that he was voting to deprive someone of their rights and freedoms?
|
|
This sh!t needs to stop?
(05-11-2012, 07:46 AM)
|
#157
Blah. My bad, read too fast. |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:48 AM)
|
#158
Because your perspective is not the only one that matters or exists. Quantify your dislike of something with a solid argument and perhaps you'll persuade people to sympathize with you or even join you. Show disrespect towards something that is commonly tolerated or "supposed" to be tolerated and you'll find yourself not taken very seriously by your opposition no matter how well reasoned you are. Just take a look at Richard Dawkins. It's not only about having respect, it's about knowing how to properly jump over the social hurdles instead of stampeding them over.
|
|
formerly zmoney
(05-11-2012, 07:48 AM)
|
#159
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:51 AM)
|
#161
It's what I was hoping this thread would be about when I saw the title but it ended up being the same political correctness / civil rights / tolerance thing GAF perpetually argues about.
Last edited by GrizzNKev; 05-11-2012 at 07:56 AM.
|
|
This sh!t needs to stop?
(05-11-2012, 07:54 AM)
|
#163
It's fine :) Forget about it.
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:56 AM)
|
#164
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:56 AM)
|
#165
|
|
good credit (by proxy)
(05-11-2012, 07:56 AM)
|
#166
Okay, I'm completely fine with that. Someone like that is rare in the real world.
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:57 AM)
|
#167
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 07:59 AM)
|
#169
If it makes you feel better, I react to things similarly, so you're not alone. :) |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 08:00 AM)
|
#170
I find it a great deal easier to contain my rage now, but the feeling I get when I hear some sounds is something I don't think will ever go away. So it's not an issue of me being intolerant... or is that still part of it?
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by GrizzNKev; 05-11-2012 at 08:05 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 08:02 AM)
|
#171
It's an understudied phenomena. It's not you consciously being intolerant - it's an autonomic reaction. Where it exactly comes from is still up for debate.
Last edited by Buzzati; 05-11-2012 at 08:08 AM.
|
|
formerly zmoney
(05-11-2012, 08:05 AM)
|
#172
I'll probably get ripped apart for my belief in sin, but its what I believe. If that offends anyone, too bad. |
|
I got d 2 tha eepdicked
d-e-e-p-d-i-c-k-e-d (05-11-2012, 08:06 AM)
|
#173
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 08:07 AM)
|
#174
Thank you so so so much for this. I try to explain it to people and they never understand. They can't see how a certain sound bothers me but nobody else. Now I can point them to a better explanation. This thread has redeemed itself for me. I am no longer insufferably intolerant! I hope, at least.
Quote:
Last edited by GrizzNKev; 05-11-2012 at 08:13 AM.
|
|
There's a duck in the room
There's a duck i-OWWWW (05-11-2012, 08:08 AM)
|
#175
|
|
is now taking requests
(05-11-2012, 08:09 AM)
|
#176
You don't have to like or approve of the shit you hate. You don't even need a reason and you get to be as bigoted and prejudiced as you like to be. You can do it while calling yourself a feminist, a religious man or a mans man. It's ok. It's your life and you get to live it as you like.
But when you use the legislative process so that you can force others to not do the shit you dont like, well that makes you a fascist and it makes me want to string you up in the nearest lamppost. |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 08:10 AM)
|
#177
I haven't met a person yet who advises people to have "thick skin" that isn't an asshole. There's my intolerance showing. Indeed.
Last edited by NullPointer; 05-11-2012 at 08:15 AM.
|
|
Treble rebel
(05-11-2012, 08:20 AM)
|
#178
NeoGAF on the other hand is not a state, and is under no obligation to extend the same free speech rights to its users that the United States of America does to its citizens. If someone wants to express bigoted opinions, I highly recommend they find another forum to post on.
|
|
(05-11-2012, 08:24 AM)
|
#180
I suppose it's the difference between passive and active approval. I actually think we'd be a much better society to not just be like "meh, gay sex is sinful, but it's cool if they wanna get married I guess. I sin too!", but to instead say "consensual human sexuality should never be considered 'sinful' or negative in any way whatsoever". Especially since "gay sex is sinful" is one of those cultural ideas that is partially responsible for the whole debate in the first place. You may personally happen to have figured out a way to separate it from your voting habits, and that's great, but I basically see that as addressing the "symptom" and not the "disease". Though one could say this is beyond the gay marriage issue specifically, and is now a discussion on how we should approach human sexuality in general. A related debate, but not necessarily the same one. |
|
I got d 2 tha eepdicked
d-e-e-p-d-i-c-k-e-d (05-11-2012, 08:25 AM)
|
#181
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 08:28 AM)
|
#182
The OP seems like a rant and you don't seem to be annoyed because you can't express your opinion. You seem to be annoyed at the fact that others may disagree with that opinion.
In other words, you don't want to be tolerant when it comes to others but demand others to be tolerant when it comes to you. You can voice your opinion all you like as long as you are ready for others to express how they feel about it. Tolerance, empathy and respect have helped us to create a better world, one where people don't fight but communicate, where people exchange their ideas and try to understand other people's point of view. In other words, all these traits and many others have created a better society where people care about each other and it has made us better individuals. Not all people are egocentric by the way. Of course it's not about being a hypocrite or anything like that. I personally hate extreme political correctness and hypocrisy with a passion. It's about learning how to better communicate with others, how to express your feelings and thoughts, how to empathise with those of others and learning which issues are actually important to you or as a whole and which aren't, where to draw the line and how respond proportinally. So go ahead, express yourself, be yourself, explain in detail how you feel and why when needed but do it respectfully, in calm. Don't try to impose your opinion; instead try to understand why others think differently and if there's something you can learn from them or about yourself. Just remember to not be a dick about it. |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 08:28 AM)
|
#183
|
|
formerly zmoney
(05-11-2012, 08:31 AM)
|
#184
You bring up the consensual sexual activity, it's still a sin if it's outside marriage. Which then gets us to the problem of the Church not allowing gays to participate in the sacrament I marriage, leading to a whole different can of worms. And I would agree that all beliefs are up for debate or discussion. I couldn't see anything bolted so what part in particular where you talking about? |
|
underwear police
(05-11-2012, 08:51 AM)
|
#185
|
|
(05-11-2012, 09:04 AM)
|
#186
Again, you as an individual may have figured out how to separate "I personally think this is sinful" from "I will vote to express my belief", and that's great. But I would rather push for a society that never thought it was sinful in the first place, since I think that would be a far more acceptable, loving, and rewarding society to live in. One likely response to this is something along the lines of "well, you might as well just ask me to not be religious anymore!" Well, I'm sure you've seen me in plenty of atheism/religion threads, so you probably know my feelings on that :D
Quote:
Another similar example of this is when the "lots of religious believers accept evolution!" idea that's always brought up (even though their version of evolution is just as fanciful in some ways as stereotypical "creationism"). |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 09:06 AM)
|
#187
|
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 09:08 AM)
|
#188
|
|
is now taking requests
(05-11-2012, 09:17 AM)
|
#191
This was a surprising conclusion to a post full of whining about stuff that you find offensive... And do you think the 350lbs dudes in wigs wears them just to insult you?
|
|
(05-11-2012, 09:20 AM)
|
#193
I think statements like this should be clarified, because literally every single person is attempting to "enforce their opinion" every time they vote, debate something, etc. I don't think making a blanket statement against "enforcing opinions" really gets to the heart of the issue.
|
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-11-2012, 09:20 AM)
|
#194
Quote:
It just isn't how it works. Bigoted opinions effect how you operate in the world whether you know it or not. To emphasize: the problem is that your hypothetical man is not a realistic man. Bigoted opinions can and will effect how you behave even in subconscious ways you are not aware of. There are lots of ways to be homophobic that aren't as simple and obvious as direct, expressed dislike of homosexuals (or black people or jewish people or muslims etc.) |
|
formerly zmoney
(05-11-2012, 09:21 AM)
|
#195
But I had to point out the irony of your statement of "liberal religious believers"...Im actually pretty traditional - mass in Latin, think Varcan II was a mediocre idea, was happy to hear about SSPX, huge fan of Benedict, etc. And as for religion and science, despite some hiccups the Church is pretty pro-science. |
|
formerly zmoney
(05-11-2012, 09:24 AM)
|
#197
|
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-11-2012, 09:27 AM)
|
#198
As another example, consider sexism in America. How often do you hear people publicly demeaning women at work? As in, expressly suggesting that they should be beneath men, or that they should not vote, and so forth? I'm sure you can still find the random crazy person willing to say these things out loud, but generally speaking that sort of talk is kept to quiet rooms at this point.
Those sorts of opinions are widely condemned and you'd probably be fired for expressing those views at virtually every major employer in America. And yet, a very real and substantial wage gap still exists between men and women in America, that persists even when we control for factors such as hours worked and level of education. The point is this: even when nobody seems to be expressing these sexist views out loud -- when everyone is "keeping it to themselves" -- we see very real and substantial effects of sexism on an enormous scale across our society. Therefore, I suggest the hypothetical man who really does keep his bigoted opinions only to himself and never lets these opinions effect his interactions with women/gays/blacks/muslims is not a real person and practically speaking never occurs, even when these bigots never express their opinions out loud. |
|
Member
(05-11-2012, 09:27 AM)
|
#199
And a real debate isn't about forcing your opinion on someone. It's about examining and presenting ideas/facts and learning from that. Not everyone realises this of course, which is why we can't have nice things I guess. |
|
"I am so fired..."
(05-11-2012, 09:30 AM)
|
#200
That's why corks were invented.
|