|
Member
(05-27-2012, 09:57 PM)
|
#201
Let me be clear on this issue. I do not and will not defend mass slaughter. Unlike you, you seem to be skipping the news of mass slaughter caused by suicide bombing and car bombs done by your friendly "AlQaeda" rebels. :)
|
|
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 09:59 PM)
|
#202
Inevitably it will become an issue of who committed the "worst" atrocities in the same vein of how Serbia/Bosnia and Kosovo were handled. Both sides did some bad shit, but Serbia was way worse in what they did. Ultimately the issue becomes that it's a civil war, and "crimes" will be hard to determine, but at this point Syrian forces appear to be more heavy handed in criminal acts.
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:01 PM)
|
#203
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:01 PM)
|
#204
Quote:
|
|
Still Alive
(05-27-2012, 10:07 PM)
|
#206
Solid warrior has valid points in some regards, but in others I think he's a bit off the mark.
However, i'll agree on the fact that this is a really complicated situation, no where near as simple as what went down in the surrounding regions. As much as it would be easier if it were simpler. |
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:07 PM)
|
#207
I don't think that's the case at all, and more is going to come out. By nature of the war as it is now information will trickle, once it's over or is beginning to conclude the flood gates will open. This has been the case in similar cases historically.
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:11 PM)
|
#208
Instead if you scroll down a little bit you'll find this paragraph in the same page, which states:
Quote:
So, Now we know that the innocent civilians were not killed by shelling, instead it was close range gun shots and physical abuse. It looks like sectarian violence to me. Does the UK and France feel ashamed now that they were rushing to blame the Syrian gov for massacre?
Last edited by Solid warrior; 05-27-2012 at 10:13 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:14 PM)
|
#209
Don't get focused on "shelling" being the only thing going wrong. Just because people aren't being killed en mass by artillery doesn't mean that shelling civilian populated areas is suddenly "ok."
Last edited by Alienshogun; 05-28-2012 at 12:12 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:25 PM)
|
#211
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:28 PM)
|
#212
Quote:
Last edited by Solid warrior; 05-27-2012 at 10:32 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:31 PM)
|
#213
And I edited another link in my post. |
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:33 PM)
|
#214
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:35 PM)
|
#215
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:37 PM)
|
#216
|
|
Member
(05-27-2012, 10:41 PM)
|
#217
Hopefully the Muslim brotherhood activists will learn the lesson of today. They're risking their credibility and the credibility of their allies as well (Read: UK/France) who most likely feels ashamed of the outcome. |
|
lacks enthusiasm.
(05-27-2012, 11:08 PM)
|
#221
Fair point, but it's the perfect expression to make when reading his posts.
Oh sorry, back to serious thread time. |
|
Junior Member
(05-28-2012, 03:33 AM)
|
#222
where were you when the government went on for over a half year firing at unarmed protests , funerals,and storming mosques? There was no FSA then, that only came after months of inaction from the world community and escalating government repression. I hope well meaning folks arent fooled by your little games and your false equivalence. anyone who takes a moment to look at the Syria news timeline from March 2011 onward can see through your smokescreen.
Quote:
Last edited by theignoramus; 05-28-2012 at 03:36 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 04:02 AM)
|
#224
Might be a silly question here, and let me pre-phase it by saying that I did not watch or study the entire video as it was quite disturbing.
That being said, these victims were killed by shells (explosions) and building debris correct? It would seem, however, most of the bodies are completely intact. Am I missing something here in regards to the effects said damages would cause on the human body? |
|
Junior Member
(05-28-2012, 04:06 AM)
|
#225
|
|
Weeping Pickle
(05-28-2012, 04:35 AM)
|
#227
Also, fuck Assad. I can't imagine the supposed "leader" of a country doing this kind of atrocity to his own citizens. |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 05:00 AM)
|
#228
Welp, saw a kid with his brain cavity open like his head was peeled open like a grape fruit in that video. Looked like someone stuck a shotgun in his mouth and pulled the trigger. Another kid looked like they stuck a pistol in his mouth and pulled the trigger. Horrifying, but I owe it to those victims to watch it. I can't tell anymore if Solid Warrior is a troll account or if he's just brainwashed. I'm not sure I care. I don't even want to indulge you for half a fucking mili-second, but if what you believe is true - why? If you really believe Al Qeda boogey men are behind this, what tactical advantage do they gain by killing kids? How does that help an insurgency in the classical sense?
Besides that Solid Warrior, after watching that video - even with your belief this was done by terrorirsts - why not advocate for an international peace keeping force? I just saw a video with the top of a child's skull that has been blown off. Forget these arab league monitors. There should be peace keepers from every nation on the planet right now on every block in Syria. Why should I hope, though, that anyone will do anything? Charles Taylor was only convicted in 2012 and Mladic's trial just started for war crimes that happened in 1992-1995. You already won Solid Warrior. You don't have to gloat. 15-20 years from now when Assad is in the Hague everyone in the west will all pretend to be shocked why we didn't do anything. I hate this world. |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 05:39 AM)
|
#230
What does AlQaeda gain by bombing markets and killing Iraqi children? None. Except chaos. The idea behind funding and recruiting peasants, villagers and defectors is to create Chaos in Syria to have a pretext for NATO invasion just like in Libya. It didn't work out in Syria. The longer this unrest takes, the more massacres you will see. because there are many militant groups in Syria that aren't even under the FSA umbrella. They are working on their own and they're promoting violent sectarian agenda. Who created these? NATO and their allies in the oasis of democracy of the Arabian Peninsula (Read: Qatar and Saudi Arabia). It's most likely that NATO members in UNSC will keep on selecting massacres to blame the syrian government for it.
Quote:
|
|
Junior Member
(05-28-2012, 06:41 AM)
|
#231
Al Qaeda is known for beheadings and acts of cruelty against non-Sunni Muslims.
These killings dont fit their modus operandi. I mean, even if the Assad regime had a shred of credibility, Id still be doubtful about any finger pointing at Sunni terrorists. The deaths are a combination of shelling from government soldiers and close quarters butchering by hired government thugs. |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 06:51 AM)
|
#233
Am not watching the video, but I do find it interesting that solid warrior uses every opportunity to defend all of assads actions. I may be mistaken, but didn't he at one point state that assad was more of a victim in this than a perpetarator? Nevertheless it seems as if either solid warrior has some connection with syria that's making him cast all blame toward assad and the military aside.(As you don't seem to want to admit fault to anything) or he gets some type of sick sadistic pleasure in seeing masses of innocents and children brutally murdered.
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 07:34 AM)
|
#235
The nato / west agenda is regime change.
They already are training funding and arming the rebels (* ) and have been for some time (probably from the begining ). It won't stop 'till they achieve that,whatever the price. Then , there will be a mass slaughter of alaoui peoples ,and chaos.But nothing will be reported (like the slaughter of black lybians during and after the lybia war for "freedom"(tm) ) If anyone thinks here that all of this is for the good of the syrian people , they have a really bad memory and criminal ignorance of what recent "humanitarian wars" were all about. Iraq ,afghanistan , lybie ,now syria ,an soon Iran ,are all about chaos and geopolitical power. The rebels* are threatening ,killing ,torturing , the people of syria that don't want to fight with them ,pro assad ,or not. Then they use their dead body for a western supported propaganda (SOHR ,your one and only source into the scandalous lives of the Assad regime -Basically,one single guy ,perfectly anti-regime ,and based in london ) Do your own research ,there is material , if you give any value for truth and real justice or want to keep a clean soul ,because mainstream media here is part of the problem (and has been for at least 11 years now) I'm all with Solid warrior.100% . And he's very brave to even reply here ,because the level of blindness is very high. * whatever that term can mean , including non syrian al qaeda fighters and mercenaries who would do anything for money. |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 08:12 AM)
|
#236
![]() syrian state tv You should apply for the news room, those identical paragraphs are being read out loud there. You probably have it on 24/7. |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 08:20 AM)
|
#237
How come you were missing after the recent UNSC circus? How come Houla massacre is not interesting to talk about anymore? Did I miss something? |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 08:33 AM)
|
#238
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 10:22 AM)
|
#240
This whole conflict is a terrible shade of grey where the 2 sides seem to have very shifty agendas and which ever news broadcasts you listen to will decide which side people at home will take. |
|
Still Alive
(05-28-2012, 11:34 AM)
|
#241
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 11:49 AM)
|
#242
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 12:08 PM)
|
#243
Also, if they can get blame on the SAF they can further the destruction of the regime. Hell, everything has been blamed on the SAF, even those two car bombs...which are again, clear tactics of Al-Qaeda... BBC, CNN, ABC, Leon Panetta himself has said Al-Qaeda has a presence there. How do we know? They came from Syria to Iraq while the US was there, and they're on their way back to familiar territory doing the same shit they have done for the past decade.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 12:20 PM)
|
#245
I don't think he's explicitly supported Assad's actions. I may be mistaken. So...your point? |
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 01:47 PM)
|
#246
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 01:56 PM)
|
#247
That wording has hurt my head. But yeah, he's obviously done stuff. I think what he's debating is what exactly he's done... I think...
Last edited by phosphor112; 05-28-2012 at 01:59 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 02:51 PM)
|
#248
An impartial account of what happened, gathered from eyewitness testimony.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18233934
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm glad it spares us the gory details. No doubt the mass-murder fans will claim the town killed all their families themselves and then lied about it to the CIA journalists just to stir up hatred.
Last edited by Jackpot; 05-28-2012 at 02:57 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 02:57 PM)
|
#250
Quote:
|