|
Member
(06-14-2012, 11:55 AM)
|
#3801
Finally got round to watching it.
Loved it. I was really entertained. Thank fuck I didn't watch the trailers though, that 3 minute one gives so much away! I don't care about the plot holes, I really enjoyed the film and really enjoyed the 3d. Saying this as someone who was a huge Alien & Aliens fan growing up. |
|
|
|
No additional functions
(06-14-2012, 12:18 PM)
|
#3805
I look at it as a whole new series. Ridley knew that the Alien series was greatly tarnished so I think he wanted give those fans something, but also make something that allows future movies more options. He knows it's a new franchise and that's clearly what he was aiming for. There were no doubts about that when he left such an open ending and so many questions for viewers. In fact, there are more questions now than there ever were before. |
|
BOSS
(06-14-2012, 12:23 PM)
|
#3807
|
|
Delusion: not just for breakfast anymore!
(06-14-2012, 12:35 PM)
|
#3809
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 12:43 PM)
|
#3813
|
|
Banned
(06-14-2012, 12:45 PM)
|
#3816
For the record, only one of the three films we're discussing was nominated for best cinematography at the Oscars, and it wasn't either of Scott's films. *awaits conveniently trotted out argument about Oscars being a joke*
Last edited by Solo; 06-14-2012 at 12:48 PM.
|
|
Delusion: not just for breakfast anymore!
(06-14-2012, 12:47 PM)
|
#3818
Then I guess it'd be a good time for me to change it. ;)
Also, I don't believe Craig's a better actor than Fassbender. Performed well but a sequel isn't guaranteed. |
|
MEMBER
(06-14-2012, 12:56 PM)
|
#3826
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 12:58 PM)
|
#3827
I'm dead serious amigo.
Or am I?
Last edited by zoukka; 06-14-2012 at 01:00 PM.
|
|
Magnificent Eager Mighty Brilliantly Erect Registereduser
(06-14-2012, 02:49 PM)
|
#3828
Saw it in non 3D due to timing issues.
Really enjoyed it. Second half of the film was a mess but it didn't really matter, it remained highly entertaining throughout. Even when the pace was going all crazy and 800 new things were popping up and then disappearing for no good reason, I still found myself enjoying myself. More than anything though I just loved how the film looked. Really stunningly beautiful and did a fantastic job of making that moon seem both fascinating and terrifying. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 04:03 PM)
|
#3829
|
|
(06-14-2012, 04:20 PM)
|
#3831
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 05:20 PM)
|
#3833
Financially all Fox cares about is that this is a way to make more money off the franchise. It is parts reboot, remake, prequel, and sequel. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 05:25 PM)
|
#3834
For an R rated sci-fi movie I'd say they're pretty happy with the first week. $51 million domestic for opening weekend. The budget was $150 million, I believe. So they should make that back with domestic receipts alone. Worldwide ticket sales and obviously DVD/Blu-ray sales will make the studio happy.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:47 PM)
|
#3837
Aliens has a lot of the same beats and characters as Alien. The main difference is the number of Aliens and guns.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:54 PM)
|
#3838
I honestly don't know what to say. You're in an extreme minority with this view. Cameron was very conscious to not do the same film again in the slightest and even five minutes of footage would show you the huge difference in approach to pacing, tone, characters, dialogue, cinematography, mis en scene, plot progression and emotion.
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 09:56 PM)
|
#3839
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 10:58 PM)
|
#3840
Finally saw this this evening (Imax 3D, which I don't normally do but it suited the film).
Obviously part of it is down to the actor, but how do you end up with a character and performance like David/Michael Fassbender when there is almost no other characterisation in the film? There are so many interesting ideas and possibilities thrown around and almost all of them get thrown away - as if the writers only thought "wouldn't it be cool if..." without actually thinking about how to build up to or explore the concepts they're bandying around. It looks great, the actors commit to it wholeheartedly (Fassbender and Rapace are particularly good, although Rapace suffers far more from the foibles of the plot and its disconnected set pieces), and I would probably watch it again. But it would have been nice if it had been a bit better. |
|
Delusion: not just for breakfast anymore!
(06-14-2012, 11:05 PM)
|
#3842
Oh well, I look forward to him in Ridley's next film 'The Counsellor'; that script should give him up much more to work with. |
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 11:16 PM)
|
#3849
|
|
Member
(06-14-2012, 11:17 PM)
|
#3850
The director is always responsible for setting the tone for everything. The lighting, cameras, actors, costumes, everything. Anything caught on camera is the direct result of the director building the film and working with his departments.
|