|
Member
(06-26-2012, 06:04 PM)
|
#1610
|
|
Member
(06-26-2012, 06:18 PM)
|
#1611
Well I might as well just trow it out there.
When I was about 7-8 my "friend" called me up Friend: Sam, come quickly Me: what is it? There was this guy age 10-12 asleep on his back. And she slowly pulls back his pants down. Me: what are you doing, he's gonna wake up F: no he's a heavy sleeper And then she proceeded to show me the male anatomy. I was a girl, so I had never seen a penis that close. She started pulling down the skin, and all I remember was how pink it was and shouting Me: He's gonna bleed out! Of course, nothing of that sort happened.Still amazed me that he could pull something out and not be in pain. She then explained me what this and that was like I gave a shit. I mean I was pretty young, all I knew was that it was used to pee. But I swear the guy did not move a muscle. He never knew about it. Nothing. She "closed" it off like: OK, let's go. I didn't touch the guy I just looked but damn, the "friend" and I never ever spoke of that again. |
|
(06-26-2012, 06:38 PM)
|
#1612
So fuck it, might as well confess to something I usually do during the summer.
I have a pair of cheap binoculars and my house is in front of an intersection. Last Saturday I must have spent a good hour just scoping out cute girls who have been walking past my house. I felt a lot like James Stewart in Rear Window. There was a girl who was standing for the bus at the corner, I was staring at her 10 minutes. I even tried to take pictures by pressing the binoculars up to the lens of my camera. Kind of sucked though, by the time I got it going, the bus had came and there was some dude waiting. |
|
Member
(06-26-2012, 06:40 PM)
|
#1614
|
|
Member
(06-26-2012, 06:41 PM)
|
#1615
I don't know that it's really a confession since I don't keep it much of a secret, but I daydream regularly about disappearing from where I'm at and starting up someplace else. New name, I don't know anyone, etc. Even if it's a case of "the grass is greener", the notion of having new things eating at me instead of the things I'm used to... it seems so appealing. Just get on a bus or a train, and adios. Maybe when I get debt-free, I'll do it for real.
|
|
Member
(06-26-2012, 06:52 PM)
|
#1616
|
|
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
(06-26-2012, 09:26 PM)
|
#1617
|
|
got my tag in the OT
(06-27-2012, 05:42 AM)
|
#1620
Quote:
So ladies, any help for confessor? |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:47 AM)
|
#1621
Why's he worried? Is the asker a girl? If not, why do you care if she likes women or not. What an odd thing to be worried about in a relationship.
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 06:06 AM)
|
#1625
That sounds awesome. I've yet to get a chance to go to a live show of any famous musicians. I went to see a handful of local punk bands play when I was in high school and was still angry and all that. I really should start looking to go to some real concerts soon. Feel like I'm missing out. I don't even know who I'd want to see as most of my favorite bands are disbanded. or ska.
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 07:24 AM)
|
#1626
The only problem I see arising if she's uncomfortable with him watching lesbian porn ;p If so then he should talk to her about that. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 08:15 AM)
|
#1627
![]() Just gonna throw it out there, and say this is pretty fucking weird.... |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 08:18 AM)
|
#1628
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 08:23 AM)
|
#1629
![]() That is really weird, dude. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 08:56 AM)
|
#1630
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 09:06 AM)
|
#1632
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:10 AM)
|
#1633
Besides, anyone who sits alone staring and secretly taking pictures of a stranger for 10 minutes is probably going to do something worse eventually. |
|
is now taking requests
(06-27-2012, 11:14 AM)
|
#1634
Really? How do all of those paparazzis make a living then? Or are they a strictly european phenomena?
Quote:
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:15 AM)
|
#1635
And girl-crush? Nothing wrong with not having any, why would this be an issue? And you don't have to be anonymous to talk about this.
Last edited by The Anti-Monitor; 06-27-2012 at 11:22 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:19 AM)
|
#1636
|
|
is now taking requests
(06-27-2012, 11:26 AM)
|
#1637
Anyway, how do paparazzis operate in the US? Also, your source is kinda shitty. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:28 AM)
|
#1638
Smh. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:31 AM)
|
#1639
We are on average more likely to show interest on the other gender I think, but there's a huge difference between being perfectly okay on talking about someone's good looks and crushing on them. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:34 AM)
|
#1640
But fine, if you want to be childish and play it like that...literally the first google hit for voyeurism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism Citing: http://definitions.uslegal.com/i/invasion-of-privacy/ Invasion of privacy is the intrusion into the personal life of another, without just cause, which can give the person whose privacy has been invaded a right to bring a lawsuit for damages against the person or entity that intruded. It encompasses workplace monitoring, Internet privacy, data collection, and other means of disseminating private information. Celebrities are not protected in most situations, since they have voluntarily placed themselves already within the public eye, and their activities are considered newsworthy. However, an otherwise non-public individual has a right to privacy from: a) intrusion on one's solitude or into one's private affairs; b) public disclosure of embarrassing private information; c) publicity which puts him/her in a false light to the public; d) appropriation of one's name or picture for personal or commercial advantage. The Supreme Court has ruled that there is a limited constitutional right of privacy based on a number of provisions in the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments. This includes a right to privacy from government surveillance into an area where a person has a "reasonable expectation of privacy" and also in matters relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing and education. However, records held by third parties such as financial records or telephone calling records are generally not protected unless a specific federal law applies. The court has also recognized a right of anonymity and the right of groups to not have to disclose their members' names to government agencies. The criminal voyeurism statute of some states cover "a place where [one] would have a reasonable expectation of privacy", meaning: A place where a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that his or her undressing was being photographed or filmed by another; or A place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance. Given the similarity to voyeurism, a jury might find that placing a hidden camera in a certain location may amount to the torts of outrage or negligent infliction of emotional distress. http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/l...nie_vidvoy.htm A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when: 1. For his or her own, or another person's amusement, entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reason- able expectation of privacy, without such person's knowledge or consent. 2. For his or her own, or another person's sexual arousal or sexual gratification, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person's knowledge or consent. 3. (a) For no legitimate purpose, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, wash- room, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a motel, hotel or inn, without such person's knowledge or consent. (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, when a person uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a hotel, motel or inn, there is a rebuttable presumption that such person did so for no legitimate purpose. 4. Without the knowledge or consent of a person, he or she inten- tionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record, under the clothing being worn by such person, the sexual or other intimate parts of such person. -- If the original poster hadn't admitted he does this just for sexual voyeurism ("pretty girls") then he may be able to get away with it. But any reasonable judge (or any human being not completely ignorant) will realize HE'S RECORDING THEIR BOOBS AND BUTTS.
Last edited by jaxword; 06-27-2012 at 11:41 AM.
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:39 AM)
|
#1642
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:42 AM)
|
#1643
If it's not true, then it seems to me that the idea is a result of a larger male influence in society leading to male ideals and fantasies being more established. If it is true on the other hand, then I could think of a number of different explanations. It could be bonding mechanism between females, or a method to get sexual satisfaction when one is not in the position to become pregnant (would fit the "college lesbian"-myth, at a young age you don't want to become pregnant but might still need sex) Or it could, again, be a result of male fantasies and stereotypes having an effect on straight women's sexual preferences by making same-gender romances and sexual attraction "okay" or even more desirable than the straight male-on-male counterpart. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:50 AM)
|
#1644
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:51 AM)
|
#1645
I think it's this. Women are "hotter" the moment they find interest in other women, which pushes more women to want to at least talking about it. The same doesn't happen in reverse.
|
|
is now taking requests
(06-27-2012, 11:53 AM)
|
#1646
And it has nothing to do with being contrarian, i'm fucking consistent in my postings if nothing else. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 11:56 AM)
|
#1647
![]() As women get more power in society, I could see the reverse becoming more acceptable (it's happening to a degree already). |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 02:59 PM)
|
#1650
|