|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:49 PM)
|
#1252
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:49 PM)
|
#1253
Yeah its cheaper than a sonos connect amp. However Sonos can read music from anywhere. Whereas with the Q you're locked into google music/video.
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:49 PM)
|
#1259
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:50 PM)
|
#1260
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:50 PM)
|
#1262
|
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:50 PM)
|
#1263
|
|
ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
(06-27-2012, 05:50 PM)
|
#1264
|
|
show 'em yer Jazz hands
(06-27-2012, 05:50 PM)
|
#1265
Not interested in the Q at all. Give me a $99 version without the amp and we'll talk.
Jelly Bean looks fantastic. Can't wait for the update to hit my Xoom. I may get my wife a Nexus 7 and we can give our son the Kindle Fire. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:52 PM)
|
#1273
https://play.google.com/store/device...HVzXzdfOGdiIl0.
No, $200 US is not equivalent to $250 AU, Google. Try a 10% discrepancy, at least then it could be down to sales tax. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:52 PM)
|
#1274
|
|
Post Count: 9999
(06-27-2012, 05:53 PM)
|
#1281
Of course the converse is true as well. Sonos doesn't support online repositories like GooglePlay, Amazon Cloud, Sky Drive, Dropbox, etc. It's sad that after all this time, even audio is still like video in that you need one player that does a great job with local content, and another that does best with online content. CE industry fucking FAIL |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:54 PM)
|
#1294
- continuing a movie I started watching elsewhere at a friends place - listening to the same music, perfectly in sync with my friends. all online at separate places Admittedly I've done something similar at one point and my original statement is a silly absolute, but the features the Q are touting definitely aren't things done often enough to warrant the price. |
|
Member
(06-27-2012, 05:54 PM)
|
#1296
I have a play 5 and i don't see a reason to shift atm. (not in anyway interested in video streaming) |
|
Banned
(06-27-2012, 05:55 PM)
|
#1299
|
|
ὁ αἴσχιστος παῖς εἶ
(06-27-2012, 05:55 PM)
|
#1300
|