|
(08-06-2012, 12:04 PM)
|
#2501
double post
|
|
|
|
lil' bit tasty
(08-06-2012, 12:18 PM)
|
#2505
First rover is still trucking and sending pics, so good. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:21 PM)
|
#2506
|
|
USA schools learnt me up something good
(08-06-2012, 12:33 PM)
|
#2508
|
|
To hell with Bono,
here's a worthy cause. (08-06-2012, 01:02 PM)
|
#2515
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:05 PM)
|
#2516
|
|
Boring Member
(08-06-2012, 01:09 PM)
|
#2517
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:14 PM)
|
#2518
The wildest idea I've heard seriously talked about is a thermal/submersible probe to explore subsurface oceans on Europa. Land a craft in the radiation and gravity maelstrom of Jupiter; then, use heating coils to melt through about a kilometer of ice; and then, deploy a submersible to explore the ocean for life. All this while establishing communications and relay links through the water, through the ice, and pretty far across the solar system. I could speculate about metallic-ceramic cryogenically cooled spherical rovers for Venus and talk of designing aircraft for Mars but I bet the resources are going to get even better in the near term. The next amazing probe might not land in our lifetimes, but hopefully that is not the case. Curiosity is an achievement for everybody on this planet, and even those select few on Newt Gingrich's Moon Enclave, too.
Last edited by Partial Gamification; 08-06-2012 at 01:15 PM.
Reason: typo
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:14 PM)
|
#2519
http://www.nasa.gov/missions/future/index.html http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/index.cfm?type=future http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/ind...?type=proposed It is so frustrating to see what NASA could do with just a little more funding. ![]() FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:23 PM)
|
#2520
The technology has its limitations. A single chemical rockets is probably not going to get one there and back again. Fuel will need to be produced on Mars to really make return-trips more cost effective.
Here is a great video (by Stan Love) on the basics of the rocket science behind basically getting shot off the planet and falling toward a target. I am so happy to have witnessed, virtually, this event! Have a simple Haiku ( I think its correct): Curiosity Mars Science Laboratory We dare mighty things
Last edited by Partial Gamification; 08-06-2012 at 01:23 PM.
Reason: typos
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:49 PM)
|
#2522
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:53 PM)
|
#2523
EDIT: Dammit all, double post :( |
|
Banned
(08-06-2012, 01:55 PM)
|
#2525
Learning is fun, but there isn't much we can do if we even find anything out there. I think a practical space goal would be advisable. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:04 PM)
|
#2526
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:16 PM)
|
#2527
It landed at 1am EST. I slept for a couple hours and woke up for it. Im not missing out on history.
Last edited by tarius1210; 08-06-2012 at 02:19 PM.
|
|
not licensed in your state
(08-06-2012, 02:19 PM)
|
#2528
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:26 PM)
|
#2530
|
|
Please, don't ask ME about Michael Jordan!
(08-06-2012, 02:46 PM)
|
#2533
I did not stay up to watch this live but the first thing I did when I got up was go to Google News to see if they pulled it off. Put a smile on my face when I saw that they did.
|
|
why I'm cranky
(08-06-2012, 02:50 PM)
|
#2535
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:51 PM)
|
#2536
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:58 PM)
|
#2539
From the NY Times article:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:58 PM)
|
#2540
Quote:
|
|
Please, don't ask ME about Michael Jordan!
(08-06-2012, 03:03 PM)
|
#2541
If you want to know why people are so amazed that they were able to pull it off go watch 7 minutes of terror on YouTube. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:08 PM)
|
#2544
I have yet to find one person on my friend list that isn't down with Curiosity, though I do think that if there were a person to get all "lol waste of money" they'd quickly be chastised. In as humiliating a manner as possible.
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:09 PM)
|
#2545
Awesome stuff |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:10 PM)
|
#2546
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:10 PM)
|
#2547
Press conference in about 50 minutes, to recap the landing and then another in about 4 hours 50 minutes.
For whoever was asking what OS was used on the main displays, it looks like Sun Solaris 10. The Mars Image Viewer app looks like it was using the Motif toolkit under X11. There was a monitor on one of the desks in the control room showing the Solaris 10 login screen. I suspect they use Sunrays |
|
Received Internet Coal
(08-06-2012, 03:10 PM)
|
#2548
Wow, it really worked. Of course I expected that, since it's NASA we're talking about. Still, this was a really really difficult mission, full of risks and many new approaches. It's just incredible what these guys can accomplish.
Now let's wait and see what Curiosity can reveal to us in the next few years! |
|
Not bitter, just unsweetened
(08-06-2012, 03:13 PM)
|
#2549
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 03:18 PM)
|
#2550
Also, thanks to JPL's flawless execution of Curiosity, there is a good chance that NASA will choose the Titan Mare Explorer for the next Discovery program to fund which would attempt to be the first craft to land in and explore an alien ocean. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_Mare_Explorer
|