|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(08-06-2012, 08:31 AM)
|
What kind of fucking idiot would believe such tripe? I don't have to think Romney is some crazy white-horse conspiracy Mormon Manchurian candidate to not vote for him. I just hear him want to close planned parenthood, boot gays out of the military, raise taxes on the middle class, cut taxes on rich people, deny climate science, want to extend the war in Iraq, endorse a personhood amendment, and some other policy prescriptions and that makes me not want to vote for him. Why can't the other side just espouse all those views and leave it at that? No need for this false narrative paranoid conspiracy bullshit.
|
|
has calmed down a bit.
(08-06-2012, 11:30 AM)
|
|
|
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
(08-06-2012, 11:32 AM)
|
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:10 PM)
|
Considering barely anyone in the Republican party is excited about Romney, how on earth are they raising record setting fundraising numbers?
I'd like to see the breakdown of total donors for this quote:
Quote:
So that napkin math basically illustrates Romney could have a meager amount of total donations with small donors accounting for the numerical majority while the vast majority of the funds actually come from the rich few. Obama had a bigger grass roots support in '08 but I think he also relied on big donors in a similar way. And he's lagging behind this cycle precisely because many of the big donors have gone to Romney or they're sitting on their hands. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 12:18 PM)
|
They really create their own set of morals don't they? The dream is over, sorry Kosmo, I know you're watching...
Last edited by codhand; 08-06-2012 at 12:20 PM.
|
|
card-carrying scientician
(08-06-2012, 12:19 PM)
|
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 01:19 PM)
|
|
|
(08-06-2012, 01:28 PM)
|
Republicans have a misunderstanding of the American public--not everyone wants to live in a mansion and have ungodly amounts of money, and we don't hate rich people (unless they're greedy obnoxious dicks like Adelson and the Koch Bros.).
The super-rich are among the most admired people in our society--but only when it comes to people like Bill Gates and Warren Bufffett who haven't sold their souls in the process of acquiring their wealth. |
|
PoliGAF Co-Champion
(08-06-2012, 01:31 PM)
|
Rice has repeatedly given firm denials when asked if she ever wants to hold office again. I highly doubt she would have even said yes.
I think the entire story was a media creation trying to woo her/convince the Romney camp of pursuing her. Or just to get attention. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:29 PM)
|
Ever since Buffett's tax comments last year he's been villified by conservatives as a greedy job killing hypocrite who should just write a check to the IRS if he wants to pay higher taxes. They don't realize that he doesn't pay lower taxes because he necessarily wants to, but because that's how the system is set up for the type of money he generates. He can't just claim his capital gains as salary. That would be fraudulent. (also, Buffett doesn't even manage any of the companies he buys. He buys companies that operate well but are undervalued, and leaves them as is. After all, it makes no sense to buy a company if you don't like what they're doing, and if you like what they're doing, it makes no sense to change that after you buy them. He's as hands off as an investor can be, as it should be) |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:31 PM)
|
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:38 PM)
|
So Romney + RNC will have a massive Cash on hand advantage (50-60 million) and Obama will end up spending even more time attending fund raisers. |
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 02:46 PM)
|
Obviously cash is a big advantage, but I do think there's a ceiling to its effectiveness in a Presidential race. POTUS candidates are extremely high-profile and a lot of information comes from media coverage (for good or ill). As someone mentioned earlier it's more likely to significantly affect downticket races, where voters might know shit-all about one or both candidates besides what they hear in advertisements.
|
|
Banned
(08-06-2012, 03:31 PM)
|
Every one of Obama's negatives have been beaten into every single voter's head for years. I don't know how much impact repeating the same stuff over and over will have. The primaries were different because not much was known to most people about the candidates. This money will have an impact down ticket, but for the Presidential race I don't see it changing much.
|
|
(08-06-2012, 03:44 PM)
|
"Important" - Obama for America TV Ad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YhDQ...layer_embedded Really nice ad. |
|
Professional Schmuck
(08-06-2012, 04:06 PM)
|
Romney's wordplay like "I paid taxes" and "everything I was legally required to do" should raise all of our hackles. Remember, it's really not relevant whether or not he's a tax-evading miser -- what's relevant is that as a billionaire, he's paying less taxes than you are, and it's perfectly legal. That's the big tell the GOP doesn't want you to find out. This is all legal and they plan on keeping it that way.
|
|
Banned
(08-06-2012, 04:11 PM)
|
|
|
Obsidian fan
(08-06-2012, 04:16 PM)
|
|
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(08-06-2012, 04:21 PM)
|
But Harry admits it is just hearsay. He says he doesn't know if it is true. It is all just meant to apply pressure for Romney to release his taxes. As long as a person really said that to Mitt Romney and Mitt Romney is a public figure, there is nothing illegal about such a statement. As they say, this ain't bean-bags. So the Romney team needs to just put on the big boy pants and deal with accusation. |
|
Purple Drazi
(08-06-2012, 04:27 PM)
|
|
|
Member
(08-06-2012, 04:28 PM)
|
And Nate is concurring with relio from above that it appears the national polling means fuck all |
|
Banned
(08-06-2012, 04:33 PM)
|
Goodbye
#10697
Well I'm going to leave this site forever now. Its been nice knowing you all.
Before I leave though I'm going to post my reactions to the hypothetical election results. Scenario 1 - Barrack Obama Victory: "Ahahahahahahaha! What the fuck did you people THINK was going to happen? Do you really believe that this country would elect the least interesting candidate in the world? Not to mention he's Mormon to boot. Now that Obama doesn't have to worry about reelection at all he's likely going to be even more ballsy this time around. Also lol Phoenix Dark." Scenario 2 - Mitt Romeny Victory: "WHAT THE FUCKING SHIT!?!!?!?!?!??! Its nice to know that this country is SOOOOOOOOO stupid that they would elect a flip-flopping Mormon over a "socialist" black president. Fuck this country. Its going to go down the tube. Pretty soon people won't be able to take this anymore. The Russian Revolution? Well it looks like for its hundreth anniversary its going to come back and with a vengence to boot. But not in Moscow however, but stateside. Also fuck you Phoenix Dark, I KNEW the whole entire time that Barrack was going to lose, I was just playing along the whole time." Scenario 3 - Barrack Obama Victory (Only through electorate, he loses the popular vote): "Well what can I say? This is shitty but the system is what the system is. And honestly I can't complain. I mean sure its dumb but this is what the founders intended because they believe that elected officials would be smarter and more reliable than a bunch of uneducate nitwits. Yes they rarely ruin the democratic process completely but this is one of the few cases where they would have and thus democracy is saved. Also yes Phoenix Dark you still lost, lol." Scenario 4 - Mitt Romeny Victory (Only through electorate, he loses the popular vote): "FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!111!!!! FASCISM!!!!!! FASCISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK THIS COUNTRY! FUCK IT!!!!!!" |
|
She Touched Me
Ohhh She Touched Me (08-06-2012, 04:43 PM)
|
|