|
Member
(08-22-2012, 10:49 PM)
|
#751
1. The risk of 'complications' for circumcision is due almost entirely to minor bleeding, which stops when pressure is applied. Think of any small cut. 2-10% (from Wikipedia) is only one guess; another one (also from Wikipedia) is 0.2-0.6%. The complication rate is astronomically low. 2. Parents decide all the time what is in the best interests of their child. That is their JOB as parents. By making choices throughout the child's life, they will cause intentional and unintentional changes in the child's physical and psychological development. Personally I don't really care about circumcision, but I want an honest debate about this, incorporating a few things: 1. A realistic complication rate 2. Real health benefits or disadvantages 3. Real evidence of changed sexual satisfaction (check Wikipedia, the results are totally mixed up so I'm sure supporters of either side will have plenty to arm themselves with). 4. Avoidance of silliness about 'trauma' a newborn suffers from an extremely minor procedure relative to the rest of their time as a newborn with an undeveloped brain. |
|
|
|
Member
(08-22-2012, 10:59 PM)
|
#754
|
|
Rodent Whores
(08-22-2012, 11:03 PM)
|
#756
|
|
Junior Member
(08-23-2012, 12:49 AM)
|
#760
Fortunately for newborns, the 1980's marked a turning point of sorts. They don't do open heart surgery on neonatal infants without anesthesia anymore. They assumed at the time that their lack of development meant no pain. Just paralyze them and cut them open. You're point about avoiding "silliness" in regards to the topic at hand is laughable. Circumcision isn't heart surgery...but the former procedure is medically unneccessary 99% of the time to begin with. Yeah, let's just assume they don't remember the pain of having their penis crushed and cut without anesthetics....for nothing. Go watch the procedure done on the tube...minor procedure my ass. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_in_babies
Last edited by Unknown Fighter Type II; 08-23-2012 at 12:55 AM.
|
|
Weeping Pickle
(08-23-2012, 01:39 AM)
|
#761
I take it as Devolution putting up a sign of "So don't bother me anymore please" for you to read, hahaha.
As I am in a place where everybody pretty much accept circumcision as something that is must be done, this thread has been a pretty interesting read. |
|
Banned
(08-23-2012, 01:58 AM)
|
#762
She complained about people not reading her posts, and then spouted blatant lies about the responses people gave her. It's rude and she's a troll. To turn around and try to hide behind her vagina in a conversation is hypocritical and just downright offensive. But it's the last time I'll talk about how obnoxious your posts are Devolution. No need to beat a dead horse.
Last edited by nVidiot_Whore; 08-23-2012 at 02:00 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 02:10 AM)
|
#764
It seems as though un-cut people say all of the time how much better the sexual experience is when you are cut. While the un-cut say all of the health benefits or say that the sex is not as worse as the un-cut make it out to be.
For me I do not care about what is cut down there. |
|
Fail out bailed
(08-23-2012, 02:11 AM)
|
#765
My mom literally told me that she got me circumcised, because when she was a young lady and snuck looks at dirty magazines it was all she'd ever seen. When she got older, the first time she saw an uncut dick it grossed her out. She didn't want me to go through that.
My mom is weird. I think it is objectively a silly and weird ritual (circumcision) but I also don't really MIND being circumcised and i certainly seems like the alternative is just one more layer of whatever to deal with in life, so I don't care?
Last edited by Staccat0; 08-23-2012 at 02:14 AM.
|
|
underwear police
(08-23-2012, 02:18 AM)
|
#766
|
|
Blacks Anonymous™
(08-23-2012, 02:33 AM)
|
#770
.
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 02:37 AM)
|
#772
An erect penis looks practically the same as an uncut one though.
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 02:44 AM)
|
#773
The whole money thing, really shouldn't be an issue. It should be covered as a pretty strongheld tradition, but I can't think of a reason why it shouldn't be phased out for anyone who wants to. I think the tough part for males who begin to change the tide, will be the slower acceptance. But I know I was pissed when I found out my penis was chopped without my consent. I think at least it looks better, but it might just be familiarity. Sensitivity, morally as a choice - uncircumscized wins.
Last edited by J2 Cool; 08-23-2012 at 03:02 AM.
|
|
Banned
(08-23-2012, 03:19 AM)
|
#774
I feel like many of the Americans here are going out of there way to point out the bias is largely manufactured. It's not meant to be an assault on cultures where circumcision is not predominant to tell stories of American women reacting negatively to un-circumcised penises. It's a real thing and as it's been pointed out, it's simply due to lack of familiarity and expectations.
|
|
I will not rest until
every fetus is destroyed (08-23-2012, 04:11 AM)
|
#776
It's an interesting argument, because on one hand, uncircumcised men can reap the benefits of vastly improved quality and duration of orgasms for both partners, prehensile abilities, and are guaranteed to never become impotent, whereas circumcised men have VIP status in the afterlife and are immune to all diseases during their time on earth. I only know one thing for sure - we should definitely all keep fighting about it.
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 04:15 AM)
|
#777
It is wrong to mutilate the genitals of children.
As for HIV, how about not fucking someone with AIDS? How about using a condom? Don't mutilate children just because you are too retarded to protect yourself. My female partners have never been bothered by my uncut cock, and always end up with a new understanding and appreciation for it. As many nerve endings in the head of the penis as there are in a woman's clit. Why the fuck would you cut off the protective covering? Smegma? I guess we should cut off women's labia so they don't get any smegma build-up in their coochies. Fucking idiots thinking they have the right to mutilate a child. |
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 04:39 AM)
|
#778
I haven't read the whole thread so Im not trying to fuel the flames but has there been any significant survey published amongst women with different pictures etc as to which they prefer the look of. I mean there is a reason 99% of porn has cut penises. It simply looks nicer aesthetically?
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 05:38 AM)
|
#779
|
|
Member?
(08-23-2012, 05:46 AM)
|
#780
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 06:04 AM)
|
#782
|
|
Member?
(08-23-2012, 06:06 AM)
|
#783
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 06:09 AM)
|
#784
I'm pretty sure it's just Americans. Erect penises look basically the same cut or uncut, so I don't know how you could say one or the other looks better in porn.
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 06:16 AM)
|
#785
|
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 06:30 AM)
|
#787
It's unlikely that such subject matter was therefore created with the interests of women in mind, though many do find value in what is produced, likely from the similarity in relationships or motivators. Factor that the US produces a significant amount of pornography for the English speaking world or world in general and you'll find an over-representation of actual circumcision. However, since an erect penis looks the same regardless of whether or not you are circumcised, it also adds to the over-representation, as with European pornography where the men should be predominantly uncut but appear cut because being erect is what they're paid for. |
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 07:24 AM)
|
#789
I disagree, penis is fine as a word. Cock seems unnecessarily agressive, but penis is all about context. There's nothing disturbing about a guy saying, "- so I told him I'm sold out, and he punched me in the penis, man!". Just hilarious.
Vagina would probably be milder funny in the same context, it's less talked about, more kept secret. Something like Urethra is an awful word though, not penis and vagina. Just stop being a pussy about using them. |
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 07:50 AM)
|
#790
You know what I find most alarming? Is that some circumcised people believe they *don't* get "dick cheese" as well, and so probably *don't* clean up down there themselves. Oh god...
|
|
Has a $20,000 pair of lederhosen he won in a game of Parcheesi.
(08-23-2012, 08:08 AM)
|
#792
|
|
Still Tagged Accordingly
(08-23-2012, 08:46 AM)
|
#794
but i agree. intercourse is far more pleasurable i'm uncircumcised
Last edited by Scrow; 08-23-2012 at 08:50 AM.
|
|
(08-23-2012, 08:48 AM)
|
#795
Might go bride shopping in Egypt soon: Female genital mutilation rife in Egypt despite ban
Quote:
![]() Mhh, /edit She lacks the lip plate there. My point is: male circumcision is just an archaic ritual.
Last edited by Phantast2k; 08-23-2012 at 08:53 AM.
|
|
Has a $20,000 pair of lederhosen he won in a game of Parcheesi.
(08-23-2012, 09:06 AM)
|
#797
Well, I'm American, so my society has only been around for a couple of hundred years or so. And half of my ancestors come from Germany, and the other half England, and I don't know what Germany and England were doing in the 1800's as far as circumcisions were concerned.
|
|
Still Tagged Accordingly
(08-23-2012, 09:12 AM)
|
#798
i thought you were thousands of years old |
|
Member
(08-23-2012, 09:30 AM)
|
#799
So I'm part of cut-GAF, been that way since birth.
I'm also an ex-Catholic and am aware that this procedure has religious connotations associated with it. My opinion? I'm pretty glad I was circumcised at brith. It looks better to me, don't have to worry about an extra layer of skin, and enables me to last longer in sex. And the major plus is that I don't have to get this procedure during adulthood, I couldn't imagine the pain I'd have to endure. |
|
Banned
(08-23-2012, 10:06 AM)
|
#800
|