|
Member
(09-13-2012, 11:58 PM)
|
#3151
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
(09-13-2012, 11:59 PM)
|
#3152
shit, why does it have to be nintendo exclusive, a sequel to beyonetta that looks just like beyonetta, or only slightly better graphically? why no next gen, noOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
To hell with Bono,
here's a worthy cause. (09-13-2012, 11:59 PM)
|
#3153
good thing they hardly showed anything of this game by the time they show it these people will have calmed down
@ "wii poo"
|
|
gittin' up in yo holonet modal verbs: dem Nanofuchs be AUXILIARY.
(09-14-2012, 12:00 AM)
|
#3156
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:01 AM)
|
#3157
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:01 AM)
|
#3159
Why the hell is it ok for Microsoft and Sony to try and gather high profile exclusive titles to make their own consoles more valuable, but when Nintendo does it, the salt just falls from the sky like a snowstorm? So much misplaced, and pointless anger its not even funny in this thread. |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:02 AM)
|
#3161
Oh man some of the images from those threads: ![]() gifGAF put some serious work in on those megaton threads. |
|
#3164
Yes, though I use my 360 the least and bought it for Death Tank, Banjo, Shadow Complex and Lost Odyssey mainly. PS3 and Wii get about the same usage time (playing through SOTC at the moment on the former and still trying to complete DKCR on the latter), with most of my current gaming divided between my PSP, 3DS, iPhone and PC. No Vita.
Not sure how its relevant but there is your answer. Why do you ask?
Last edited by Mama Robotnik; 09-14-2012 at 12:08 AM.
|
|
baby dolphin -> sun
it's the only way (09-14-2012, 12:04 AM)
|
#3168
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:05 AM)
|
#3169
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3172
Not to mention I'm still not really convinced there wouldn't have been a sequel eventually anyway. Thanks. On an unrelated note, can you spot me 300 bucks? :P |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3173
|
|
Combovers don't work when there is no hair
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3174
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3175
So Nintendo rescuing a loved, dead franchise is a bad thing now? Holy fuck at some gamers. People would honestly prefer a game to be thoretically multi-format and not exist, than be exclusive and exist. Cray, crazy, crazy.
I'm not sure what news this morning has made me happier. The relatively cheap Aussie price of the Wii U, or this.
Last edited by SPE; 09-14-2012 at 12:16 AM.
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3176
Sure assuming you have the money to buy it, or was interested in a Wii U in the first place. I can understand people being disappointed in that. Not the Twitter nutjobs and fanboys, but regular folk who don't usually own more than one console.
This isn't like the FF13 thing where you have an exclusive going multi and people raging about people on other platforms they don't own getting to play it, this is a game where the first one was multi platform and now you can only play it if you own that console. Much better than not having it at all, i agree. But it isn't hard to understand why some would be annoyed at this, especially if they have no plans to buy the console for that game. By the way is this going to be a launch/ launch window title? |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3177
Huge, megaton OMG|OMG|OMG etc. etc. within gaf. No real significance at all outside of gaf.
IIRC didn't Bayo sell well under 2 million copies on both platforms combined, and didn't even break 1 million on 360? Not exactly what any rational person would call a system seller. Doubt this will do a whole lot for the U. This thread has been pretty fun to read so far, though :) |
|
Wishes he was as cool as MC Miker G & DJ Sven
(09-14-2012, 12:07 AM)
|
#3178
The twitter salt makes this thread more epic than the other meltdowns. Thank u social media.
|
|
is too reasonable
for this forum (09-14-2012, 12:09 AM)
|
#3179
If there's something Nintendo doesn't really need help with, it's system sellers. |
|
baby dolphin -> sun
it's the only way (09-14-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#3181
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
#3184
|
|
"Who said you should help?"
(09-14-2012, 12:11 AM)
|
#3186
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:11 AM)
|
#3187
But yeah, I'm assuming this was a fairly cheap pickup for Nintendo. |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
#3189
|
|
Banned
(09-14-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
#3190
The thing is I can understand people being disappointed about not getting the game on the system they own but people do seem to get overly angry about the idea of hardcore games going to Nintendo...because their systems aren't supposedly 'for' them. All a bit odd.
Am already dreading the sales threads :/ From the MH thread:
AMAZE - find better in the other threads. Try ;p |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:13 AM)
|
#3191
The amount of times even Sega has come out and said they where dropping the vast majority of retail products so they can double down on select high selling properties is in the dozens already. Bayo 2 got canned when all the trouble hit Sega early this year, late last year. |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:13 AM)
|
#3192
It seems if Nintendo wasn't publishing Bayonetta 2, it would not even get made. It's an awkward one. Imagine your favourite multiplatform third party game just doesn't sell that well. Nobody is interested in publishing it. Out of nowhere, the publisher you are not interested decides to invest in the sequel but the catch is you have to buy that publisher's hardware to play it. Even if you won't buy or borrow a WiiU to play it, the only way to approach this circumstance is to be happy others DO get to play it and hope it keeps the franchise relevant into the future. This is not at all like what Capcom has done with Monster Hunter or what Square-Enix has done with Kingdom Hearts. They somewhat abused their fans by radically switching big franchises to different hardware (from Sony to Nintendo, usually). I can understand some of the bitter tears, for single console owners especially.
Last edited by hatchx; 09-14-2012 at 12:16 AM.
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:13 AM)
|
#3193
|
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:14 AM)
|
#3195
GAF is pretty crazy for the game though. |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:14 AM)
|
#3196
I said gottdamn, I totally forgot about this :'(( Wasn't there another parody like this?
It's even worse than I ever thought. And with worse I mean better. |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:15 AM)
|
#3197
Nintendo bank rolled it. No Nintendo, No game. Maybe in the future Sega would have made a break trhough and went back and finished it but why would they wait for that when they can get guaranteed monies now? Sega is going broke. They need the cash. Nintendo was willing and here we are. I get the whole "damn I wish this was on a system I currently have" sentiment because buying a system for one game is stupid. I really do but understand that there is no Bayonetta 2 without Nintendo. That much we all should be able to agree with. |
|
Member
(09-14-2012, 12:16 AM)
|
#3198
What the fuck is this shit.
Go ahead and laugh, I guess it's cool to make fun of everyone who is upset this is a Wii-U exclusive. Bayonetta is one of my favorite games of all time and I have no intention of buying a Wii-U... I wouldn't mind if it was a Microsoft or Sony exclusive because at least they still have other games to play on their system that are in the vein of Bayonetta. Putting Bayonetta 2 exclusively on a family friendly Mario console is the dumbest fucking thing I have ever heard of. |
|
Banned
(09-14-2012, 12:16 AM)
|
#3200
why do they have to steal our games?and that's exactly what they do,taking a beloved 3rd party franchise and making it exclusive so others can't play it is stealing
Quote:
|