|
Member
(02-19-2013, 10:30 PM)
|
#52
What multiplayer shooters do you play these day then? Just curious. BF3 takes a dump on 99% of the current competition.
|
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 10:31 PM)
|
#53
Come again? BF3 was far from a massive disappointment. There's a crowd of die-hard BF fans that aren't happy the direction the series is going, but all in all it was a great title that was enjoyed by many. I'd argue it is still the best multiplayer shooter available right now, especially on PC. 17+million copies for what was just a few years ago a PC exclusive shooter is extremely impressive.
|
|
Junior Member
(02-19-2013, 10:32 PM)
|
#55
|
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 10:33 PM)
|
#56
Really? Not to start a fight here, but what was so disappointing to you? Huge Battlefield fan and I farking loved it, but again everyone has opinions and all :) Really looking forward to BF4, and I hope they do include SP, I was one of the weirdos that actually liked the campaign. Of course multiplayer is my main bread and butter, over 285 hours with almost 22k kills.
|
|
Junior Member
(02-19-2013, 10:35 PM)
|
#57
Last edited by TalesOfWin; 02-19-2013 at 10:37 PM.
|
|
Banned
(02-19-2013, 10:39 PM)
|
#58
I kinda wish I was excited. I love BF3. I got it day 1 but them excluding voice chat was one of the stupidest things anyone could do to an online game. I don't have any of the DLC for BF3 excluding Karkand and now there's a BF4 coming already that's NOT a sequel to 2142. BF3 could've been so much more.
I'll be skipping the BF series for a while and just stick to Planetside 2. Maybe I'll come back when they make 2143. |
|
st5fu
(02-19-2013, 10:40 PM)
|
#59
BF 3 multi-player, on console no less (with gimped player count and tech), has been the most fun I've had in this generation of gaming. And this is coming from someone who was never big in multiplayer shooters or multiplayer games in general. It's pretty much the only game I play right now (along with Skyrim).
|
|
Junior Member
(02-19-2013, 10:42 PM)
|
#60
you're skipping a game that hasn't even been shown yet? |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 10:45 PM)
|
#63
But in a general sense when it comes to the relationship between those companies you're probably right. |
|
Banned
(02-19-2013, 10:47 PM)
|
#65
Yes, because there's an alternative out there for me that will save me money. It's not just the game, but also EA's business model. I'm not going to buy a new BF game every two years especially when previous BF games have lasted much longer. I'll just stick to BF3 if I want to play BF just like those who still play Bad Company 2.
|
|
Junior Member
(02-19-2013, 10:52 PM)
|
#67
If anything I'm only looking forward to it to see how much more they could possibly ruin the series. Oh and their wonderful DLC schemes are always more exciting than the last.
|
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 10:55 PM)
|
#70
Battlefield 1942 - 2002 Battlefield Vietnam - 2004 Battlefield 2 - 2005 Battlefield 2142 - 2007 Battlefield: Bad Company - 2008 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - 2010 Battlefield 3 - 2011 Battlefield 4 - 2013/2014 |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:01 PM)
|
#77
BF3 is an excellent game, online surpasses any other online FPS out there. |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:06 PM)
|
#84
Last edited by Kenak; 02-19-2013 at 11:08 PM.
|
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:12 PM)
|
#86
Official Battlefield twitter:
https://twitter.com/Battlefield/stat...19835107557376 ![]() Really does seem like they've got something big coming. Almost sure we'll see BF4 tomorrow. |
|
Junior Member
(02-19-2013, 11:19 PM)
|
#88
I guess if you weren't expecting something similar to BF2, and have no problem with a game's community being fragmented so badly, sure. |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:22 PM)
|
#89
Yeah, with EA letting certain people see, and more importantly publicly say they saw, Battlefield 4 you can all but guarantee it will be shown at tomorrow's PS4 event or at the latest within the next two weeks. My prediction: The game will be shown and Sony will boast about how it not only looks better than Battlefield 3 on the PC but has increased levels of destruction. And of course, some level of exclusivity.
Last edited by Quicksilver4648; 02-19-2013 at 11:28 PM.
|
|
member
(02-19-2013, 11:25 PM)
|
#90
|
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:25 PM)
|
#91
|
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:27 PM)
|
#93
Yes. PS3 gets DLC content one week before other platforms. I wouldn't be surprised if that relationship continues for BF4, which makes it all the more likely that we will see the game for the first time on PS4.
|
|
badchoiceboobies
(02-19-2013, 11:33 PM)
|
#94
Looking forward to it, it will no doubt look fantastic, here is hoping it will be shown tomorrow on some nice modern hardware and we don't end up with a BF3 again and some great looking games toned down to 8 year old tech.
I'm not however looking forward to the amount of "called it" posts coming tomorrow with everyone saying they were the first to come up with something. |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:34 PM)
|
#95
But after BCs campaign it just went downhill and they became more and more linear. It needs to be less like CoD and more like Battlefield/Crysis |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:34 PM)
|
#96
Last edited by Sn4ke_911; 02-19-2013 at 11:37 PM.
|
|
Banned
(02-19-2013, 11:37 PM)
|
#97
I agree on no single player. Or if there is any, make it single story campaigns and not an overall story line. It doesn't suit the game and Dice don't excel there.
So basically an imaginary war with battles taking up multiple levels. Like an old WWII game but modern. |
|
Member
(02-19-2013, 11:38 PM)
|
#98
They've been doing that since forever though hence me posting the release schedule. Yeah I guess the argurement could be made manpower is being diverted to create the single-player portion but if they have allocated staff just for that purpose then it shouldn't make much of a difference.
|
|
WELCOME TO THE XANDER ZONE
(02-19-2013, 11:38 PM)
|
#99
Console players (on next-gen platforms at least) will see the biggest improvement, I'm sure. Still, I bet a good amount of work can be done to improve the UI and overall experience that will be welcome on PC.
|