This makes it seem like you're very angry just about the fact that another, wholly unrelated, horror game has been funded in some way while your favorite wasn't. It's childish in an "If I can't have mine you shouldn't have yours" way.
This is probably fairly accurate, in that it bothers me that Mikami's "shooter-style" Resident Evil became the de facto standard for console survival horror.
But I have respect for Mikami as much as I do for Dyack, for any creative person trying to make a creative product in this industry. For the purposes of argument and comparing/looking at Denis Dyack I have drawn comparisons at various times to Mikami, Tim Shaeffer, Bryan Fargo, Lord British, and Randy Pitchford.
But as for childish? Only once of the two of us is calling people names.
You CAN have The Evil Within. Nothing I can do to change anything about that, and I wouldn't. But the reverse, briefly, was true: if people supported the game here and weren't so cynical and partisan--if there weren't still this lingering feeling of partisan response of "owned by NeoGAF"--I could have had the horror game I wanted.
There's nothing for people to put their faith in but a short tech demo with no actual gameplay.
This was WAAAY more than most Kickstarters show to get funded, and it looked WAAAY better than most demos shown as well. But even though it was playable in CryEngine 3, people accused them of taking it whole cloth from Silicon Knights because a monster design and a church design was purchased and retained.
I guess my point is that there was SO MUCH for people to put their faith into, they just didn't.