Are you sure it's because they don't have any confidence in Fire Emblem Warriors.
Hyrule Warriors reviewed well and NoE had no problem sending out review copies. Assuming it's due to Nintendo not having faith in the game seems odd to m.
Are you sure it's because they don't have any confidence in Fire Emblem Warriors.
This is an interesting response to a leak. I'm wondering how much it will influence the games. Mario probably not, but FEW might lose a bit of interest.
I don't really blame them for the heavy handed approach, but they have to live with the consequences. Sucks for the smaller channels that depend on them.
Jesus. And Nintendo was one of the good ones in terms of getting games for review out early and giving reviewers plenty of time to play them before embargo. To have them get burned this bad makes me pretty angry honestly.
lol remember when all of yall wanted the BOTW demo to leak and said its a good thing lol
Are you sure it's because they don't have any confidence in Fire Emblem Warriors.
It sounds like one of the people involved was getting review copies and Nintendo was able to trace it back to that person.
I am soooo curious as to who was stupid enough to leak it
NoA should sue them. Get them shook and make an example.
Of all the games to get punished for.
A remake of a GBA game. Imagine if it was Breath of the Wild (assuming it was possible to do in the first place).
True, but they fear it might happen again. It's a lot harder to hold influencers responsible than larger companies. Either A) it's to send a message they're taking leaks seriously and will allow them later on, or B) they're redoing they're review policy and only larger groups will get the games early. Or, C) it has nothing to do with leaks and just mismanagement.It sounds like one of the people involved was getting review copies and Nintendo was able to trace it back to that person.
Remember when Nintendo punished all EU Pokemon fans for a leak of XY that happened in a few stores peppered across the planet?
Interesting. I didn't even know that information was stored but it makes sense I guess. I bet a bunch of past leakers now might be a bit scared unless this has been known and I'm just out of the loop.They noted that the move from Nintendo of America feels a little drastic considering, as they claim, "Nintendo knows who did it," referring to the leaker. "[Nintendo] downloaded the leaked [ROM], checked the files and found the 3DS serial attached."
Interesting. I didn't even know that information was stored but it makes sense I guess. I bet a bunch of past leakers now might be a bit scared unless this has been known and I'm just out of the loop.
Of all the games to get punished for.
A remake of a GBA game. Imagine if it was Breath of the Wild (assuming it was possible to do in the first place).
Yeah, it was leaked nearly a month before release, which is pretty crazy. Im sure this, as well as Nintendos weird overconfidence with continuing the 3DS, has them shocked after seeing what I am only assume are mediocre sales numbers.It honestly took me by surprise how early the game leaked. Samus Returns only got out like 3 or 4 days before release, but M&L leaked way, way before launch. I assumed it broke street date in the UAE or something, but a reviewer uploading a .cia copy came out of left field.
Sucks to see that this crack down heavily impacts smaller reviewers who are just following the rules.
Oops. I forgot Breath of the Wild came out on Wii U for some reason.I'm fairly sure they will do whatever they can to thoroughly fuck who ever leaked it.
With the WiiU, it was, and a street broken copy would have been trivial to dump and disseminate.
100% certain it was an influencer. No site would be dumb enough to do lose ever getting a review copy from Nintendo again.
Ah okay, so basically Dumping-101 right? Gotcha.Scrubbing a dump is usually step number one if you know what you are doing, its like not scrubbing meta-data.
This is more a case of 15-minutes of fame, poor foresight, and then years of being screwed.
What is an 'influencer'?
What is an 'influencer'?
A more technical name for content creators, or streamers.What is an 'influencer'?
What is an 'influencer'?
Ah okay, so basically Dumping-101 right? Gotcha.
Well, XY was leaked about two weeks before, so there would've been nothing for you to mention, anyways.Of course I remember as I was affected by that, man waiting an extra 5 days for the Hoenn remake and Sun and Moon was a pain as everyone was off having fun but we were left out in the cold and it felt so backward going from a worldwide release to a kinda worldwide release, plus it just felt weird playing a new game on a Wednesday as I wasn't able to sit down and play it till Friday.
Granted I got X and Y a day early but I did my part by not leaking anything of the game and would be rewarded by Lord Arceus.
Luckily we're getting Ultra Sun and Moon on the same date as everyone else.
Interesting. I didn't even know that information was stored but it makes sense I guess. I bet a bunch of past leakers now might be a bit scared unless this has been known and I'm just out of the loop.
Scrubbing a dump is usually step number one if you know what you are doing, its like not scrubbing meta-data.
This is more a case of 15-minutes of fame, poor foresight, and then years of being screwed.
True, but they fear it might happen again. It's a lot harder to hold influencers responsible than larger companies. Either A) it's to send a message they're taking leaks seriously and will allow them later on, or B) they're redoing they're review policy and only larger groups will get the games early. Or, C) it has nothing to do with leaks and just mismanagement.
I can understand being cautious about 3DS games leaking, but it seems strange to me to with hold Switch games, since it isn't emulatable or cracked right now, so Piracy shouldn't be a big concern.
I feel like Nintendo is taking the most extreme measure until they can figure out how to alter their relationship with influencers. It really looks like they had a huge reaction to this and went to code red immediately to protect Odyssey.
Reminder to all those that want to leak nintendo games Nintendo sued a man for 1.5 million dollars cause he leaked New Super Mario Bros wii early.
He wasn't a man, he was a teenager.
What is an 'influencer'?
Well, XY was leaked about two weeks before, so there would've been nothing for you to mention, anyways.
That story was so insane because the dude posted an unredacted picture of his receipt.Reminder to all those that want to leak nintendo games Nintendo sued a man for 1.5 million dollars cause he leaked New Super Mario Bros wii early.
The whole influencer thing is so weird anyways.
Just send review copies to actual reviewers.
So Mario & Luigi got mixed reviews? Why isn't there context in the OP?
So Mario & Luigi got mixed reviews? Why isn't there context in the OP?
Of all the games to get punished for.
A remake of a GBA game. Imagine if it was Breath of the Wild (assuming it was possible to do in the first place).
So Mario & Luigi got mixed reviews? Why isn't there context in the OP?
So Mario & Luigi got mixed reviews? Why isn't there context in the OP?
This is why we can't have nice things. Fuck you and your Robin Hood delusion anon.
Breath of the wild was leaked like 4 days before the game came out.