EA's program is entirely new and right out of the gate you get a free AAA game
So if you keep paying them, can you get another 6 hours? Because if you can't, PS+ is still better, as you get to keep playing your games as long as you pay for PS+.
EA's program is entirely new and right out of the gate you get a free AAA game
This sounds like it makes sense but do you have a source?
My assumption is that games that are single player heavy will have the minimum access that was stated in the original press release (2 hours). That way people can't complete the whole thing without paying but still get a good idea about whether they want to purchase or not.
So people pay 5 bucks per month for a 6 hour demo pre-release, even if they bought it and a 10% discount? OVER VALUE. Please take all my money EA... lmao
So people pay 5 bucks per month for a 6 hour demo pre-release, even if they bought it and a 10% discount? OVER VALUE. Please take all my money EA... lmao
So if you keep paying them, can you get another 6 hours? Because if you can't, PS+ is still better, as you get to keep playing your games as long as you pay for PS+.
EA early access only 6hrs of gameplay for upcoming Madden 15. Now I see why Sony didn't allow this.
So if you keep paying them, can you get another 6 hours? Because if you can't, PS+ is still better, as you get to keep playing your games as long as you pay for PS+.
So people pay 5 bucks per month for a 6 hour demo pre-release, even if they bought it and a 10% discount? OVER VALUE. Please take all my money EA... lmao
Yeah, because the true value in this deal is the limited Early Access (which was all explained clearly at the reveal), not access to The Vault.
Keep defending Sony for making the decision for you though.
People are defending this shit? If you support practises like this all publishers will follow and everyone is asking for subs to basicly give you longer demos.
People are defending this shit? If you support practises like this all publishers will follow and everyone is asking for subs to basicly give you longer demos.
This sounds like it makes sense but do you have a source?
My assumption is that games that are single player heavy will have the minimum access that was stated in the original press release (2 hours). That way people can't complete the whole thing without paying but still get a good idea about whether they want to purchase or not.
How do you propose that a developer gives you access to a full game without applying a time restriction on it?
This. This has been said an abundance of times, and people are just doing drive-by posting. When they get corrected, some don't bother to type "My bad, I didn't know" But yeah, saint SONY can't do no wrong.
People are defending this shit? If you support practises like this all publishers will follow and everyone is asking for subs to basicly give you longer demos.
I dont see the issue here..
We decide if we want to pay 5/30 bucks for access to
1. Free titles in their Vault. A library which they've said will grow over time and not have titles with an expiry date.
2. 10% off on digital purchases on all their titles in the digital store.
3. 1 week early access to new launch titles in their full form (not demos). With the ability to carry over saved progress if we decide to purchase them.
As part of this now, they've said Madden doesn't give you a week, but 6 hours of a full game trial.. not just a few modes and 1 exhibition game.. and we rage about the payment choice we control ?
I can see that if you signed up for this program only to get Madden, you're paying extra 5/month and 55 for the game when it releases and a 6hr demo. but there is value here if you look at what you get overall imho.
Did people really think theyd get infinite access to games that arent even released yet for 5 days? lawl
People clearly arent thinking before responding. But ragers gonna rage....
Why there is no EA Access for Origin?
As far as I can see, the only downside is that we're losing demo's - which seemed to be happening anyway from all sorts of publishers - and there's a risk EA try and creep the price up over time. That's when it might be difficult to opt out if too much of your game library is vault games.
I don't know if anyone fears "price creep". The suspicion is simply that EA will remove "free" stuff and throw it behind the paywall to increase value.
From there, EA can add features to gradually force Sony/Nintendo to allow the paywall on their platforms.
I'm not sure it's a bad thing exactly. From EA's point of view, this path leads to all kinds of great buzzwords.
As far as I can see, the only downside is that we're losing demo's - which seemed to be happening anyway from all sorts of publishers - and there's a risk EA try and creep the price up over time. That's when it might be difficult to opt out if too much of your game library is vault games.
Early Access, unlimited play, $5 a month and discounts was an amazing deal
Early Access, 2-6 hrs per game depending on the game, $5 a month and discounts is a decent deal
don't forget The Vault. That's where the real deal is, for me...As someone said.
the original thought:
the realistic thought:
As someone said.
the original thought:
the realistic thought:
don't forget The Vault. That's where the real deal is, for me...
(picture)
That has to be fake right? Please tell me that is fake.
Nobody should've been stupid enough to see early access as the attraction. It said right at the first page that games would be time limited, they even said it's two hours for DA.
The value is in the vault and discounts. 10 % off amounts to 6 bucks for new releases. EAA is 5 bucks. So basically if you buy a new EA game you sign up for EAA, save 1 buck, get to earn achievements one week in advance and get four free games for a month on top. People crying about no value and lol EA have clearly lost it.