Yes. It's been years and there's no telling it how long it could be after this hypothetical and how other events in the meantime could've messed their relationship up even more.
You made a post noting the importance of players who want to play as Joel while there's a strong, general movement in the industry towards more diverse main characters, you expect the content of your post not to be challenged? What do you think it says about the strength of your opinions if you scare away from resisting to scrutiny, instead choosing to say that opinions don't need scrutiny because they are worthless anyway?
A big part of having an opinion is considering all aspects of whatever it is you have an opinion about, they're not meant to be primal and instinctive reactions, they're supposed to be posited, considered stances. An opinion that doesn't take into consideration other people displays that same quality of its, uh, opiner.
Saying unironically that the only reason men would empathize with a concept like women being treated equally is because they wanna get laid, holy fucking shit, while simultaneously complaining that said mindset, as in, EQUAL TREATMENT FOR WOMEN, is ruining the games industry, what the actual fuck. Yes, Neil Druckmann is treating a character like Ellie freely because he wants to get laid, a married man with a kid just wants a harem of feminists. These dudes are some straight up fuckbois but at least their showing their asses so we can show them the door.
I don't like a character that you like, so you're laughing and dissing my opinion because it goes against what you believe. You don't see the redundancy in that?
There are a lot of characters in games that I don't like as a matter of fact; in Final Fantasy VII I can't stand Cait Sith and if you like Cait Sith, then are you going to laugh at the fact that I don't like him?
If I don't feel some reasonable connection with the main character then I'm not invested in them succeeding. Why waste my time helping a complete ass accomplish whatever they're trying to do? That's why I passed on GTA V. Obviously this is a personal take on things that isn't universally shared.
It's not that the character has to be a good person, but I have to at least be able to empathize with them. Joel clearly fell into the morally grey area but I understood his situation and motivations. That was enough, but I'm really looking forward to a game with Ellie as the primary playable character.
I refuse to believe this is a real post. Spoiler of what? That Ellie is in the game? I guess it "spoils" that she survives in TLoU1, but it could have been a prequel. But anyway, come on -- were you really expecting to go 2-3 years (or however long until TLoU 2 is out) without knowing who the game's protagonist was going to be?
Please. If you are that sensitive to spoilers and care that much about TLoU's plot, play the game original game already...
I refuse to believe this is a real post. Spoiler of what? That Ellie is in the game? I guess it "spoils" that she survives in TLoU1, but it could have been a prequel. But anyway, come on -- were you really expecting to go 2-3 years (or however long until TLoU 2 is out) without knowing who the game's protagonist was going to be?
Please. If you are that sensitive to spoilers and care that much about TLoU's plot, play the game original game already...
My only guess would be if someone wanted a complete blackout on the game, knowing Ellie is the main playable character is kind of a spoiler. That's all I got. Don't know how that relates to the first game though.
I don't like a character that you like, so you're laughing and dissing my opinion because it goes against what you believe. You don't see the redundancy in that?
There are a lot of characters in games that I don't like as a matter of fact; in Final Fantasy VII I can't stand Cait Sith and if you like Cait Sith, then are you going to laugh at the fact that I don't like him?
I don't like a character that you like, so you're laughing and dissing my opinion because it goes against what you believe. You don't see the redundancy in that?
There are a lot of characters in games that I don't like as a matter of fact; in Final Fantasy VII I can't stand Cait Sith and if you like Cait Sith, then are you going to laugh at the fact that I don't like him?
This is what people are responding to. Ellie in TLOUS2 could be an amazing character. Aloy (I don't know her age but she is young) in Horizon could also be an amazing character, but they are already off putting for you because of their sex and age.
I'm not a female, nor am I a teenager - so that makes me not relate to Ellie and makes me uninterested in playing as her. Noctis is a male - which I am also - but I'm not 20. But I love anime, fantasy games and action games, so therefore he's a very relatable, likeable character to me. Ellie is a whiny, stubborn, too-cool-for-school, grungy teenager that has a chip on her shoulder and if I played The Last of Us Part II, I'd be forced to only play as her.
That doesn't seem very interesting, fun, worthwhile or a good way to spend my entertainment time.
You want to have an empowering female lead you can play Tomb raider. Half the reason people loved The last of us is because of the visceral combat of playing as joel. Which btw was the main character.
Peeps are unironically complaining about playing as a woman in an industry dominated by male, specifically several variations of gruff white men or cocky white men. Wow.....
For those who don't wanna give this a click, this is the name of the video:
MILO at Auburn University: "Male Feminists Are Either Virgins, Perverts, or Both"
Yes, THAT Milo. From Breibart. Saying and I quote, that men who are feminists "hate themselves so much and will believe literally anything that some dumpy fat lesbian blogger tells him."
Wow......WOOWWWWWW.
I refuse to believe this is a real post. Spoiler of what? That Ellie is in the game? I guess it "spoils" that she survives in TLoU1, but it could have been a prequel. But anyway, come on -- were you really expecting to go 2-3 years (or however long until TLoU 2 is out) without knowing who the game's protagonist was going to be?
Please. If you are that sensitive to spoilers and care that much about TLoU's plot, play the game original game already...
I'm not a female, nor am I a teenager - so that makes me not relate to Ellie and makes me uninterested in playing as her. Noctis is a male - which I am also - but I'm not 20. But I love anime, fantasy games and action games, so therefore he's a very relatable, likeable character to me. Ellie is a whiny, stubborn too-cool-for-school, grungy teenager that has a chip on her shoulder and if I played The Last of Us Part II, I'd be forced to only play as her.
That doesn't seem very interesting, fun, worthwhile or a good way ti spend my entertainment time.
Yes. It's been years and there's no telling it how long it could be after this hypothetical and how other events in the meantime could've messed their relationship up even more.
Giraffes could have trampled Joel to death. And Ellie is going to kill them all. I mean a lot of things COULD happen. But based on what we do know of the story so far having Ellie kill Joel then have chats with his ghost would be a weird direction to go.
I don't mean to attest to what has or has not to be interesting, but Joel was hardly overrated. He was fairly nuanced, had clear and strong character growth, and was core to the game's story and thematics. Not to say he was the only such character in videogames at the time of release but his execution would be no less meaningful had it lacked in uniqueness.
I also wouldn't say that Joel is, uh, "likeable" in the sense that i think he'd be the kind of person to never get along with anyone in real life, and who would also probably devolve into alcohol driven self destructive behavior had the zomiepocalypse happened. But he has a strong presence and a clear set of values which makes him charismatic as a fictional character. The game is also such that the main conflict of his character is almost immediately evident by virtue of an early introduction of Ellie, which further increases his narrative value. Thus i don't think him being cool or awesome or interesting is necessary, and at worst it's kind of missing the point.
So, a character whose motivations and general character are still discussed regularly today (years after hte game was released) is somehow uninteresting?
Motivations? His motivations were entirely self serving, just like Kratos. Their situations actually have a lot of paralells. They both had family murdered, and it turned them into monsters. Yes, Joel had to kill people to survive, but he did so in unnecessarily brutal ways, like Kratos. Not only that, but he ALWAYS acted in a way that was self serving, again like Kratos. The end of the game, he made his way through the laboratory, going through every one, stopping at nothing to get what he wanted, even though it meant fucking up a chance to help heal humanity, all because he couldn't cope with the loss of his daughter and needed Ellie to fill that roll (you can again draw parallels to Kratos in GOW III trying to protect Pandora).
Unlike Kratos, in the end Joel did what he did throughout the entire game, and acted in ways that only benefited him, while the K man "killed" himself and gave hope back to humanity. And here we are in a world where everyone praises the character of Joel when he is as subtle as a flying brick and as deep as a kiddie pool. Great performance by Troy Baker though.
Well again, if you expect to go several years without knowing who the protagonist of a Famous Game Part 2 is, you're deluding yourself. If you care that much about this kind of spoiler, play the original game already.
I feel like the current discussion ITT is very on topic and relevant.
A great game is getting a sequel with a female lead
People are against Ellie for the reason of her age and sex
The industry insiders have commented on the need for more diverse protagonists
We are on a video game forum discussing a video game protagonist
So I can't see how someone would think it is unreasonable for people to respond to their opinion that comes off as very outdated and tone death.
I'm looking forward to seeing Ellie's growth from TLOU to Part 2. I mean we even see her hands shaken in the trailer. She's been through some shit. But naaah let's just write her off.
It's not a spoiler after all these years. At that point, and the fact they're scouring a gaming forum that just announced a sequel, it's on them to continue not being spoiled for THEM.
The internet is too big to tip toe around things like that.
Unless the thread explicitly states no spoilers and it's recent...I refuse to try and play that game. Ellie survives.
Giraffes could have trampled Joel to death. And Ellie is going to kill them all. I mean a lot of things COULD happen. But based on what we do know of the story so far having Ellie kill Joel then have chats with his ghost would be a weird direction to go.
This kinda reminds me of the time when someone made a big deal that raichu was getting an Alola form for the Sun&Moon game and they included it in the title. It was something funny.
Also some of you are really wacky which is to be expected I guess.
If I don't feel some reasonable connection with the main character then I'm not invested in them succeeding. Why waste my time helping a complete ass accomplish whatever they're trying to do? That's why I passed on GTA V. Obviously this is a personal take on things that isn't universally shared.
It's not that the character has to be a good person, but I have to at least be able to empathize with them. Joel clearly fell into the morally grey area but I understood his situation and motivations. That was enough, but I'm really looking forward to a game with Ellie as the primary playable character.
He's right there in the trailer, and Ellie talks to him, obviously angry at someone or something that isn't him, so at that point in the story he's still her friend/ally at least. Joel is not only in the game, there is zero evidence that he'll die so far.
It's not a spoiler after all these years. At that point, and the fact they're scouring a gaming forum that just announced a sequel, it's on them to continue not being spoiled for THEM.
The internet is too big to tip toe around things like that.
Unless the thread explicitly states no spoilers and it's recent...I refuse to try and play that game. Ellie survives.
I agree, I think enough time has passed since the first game. I don't have a problem with the thread title by the way, I just thought the poster I quoted was being pretty obtuse about the whole thing. it's a spoiler. ain't no two ways about it. however it's a spoiler from a game that came out over 3 years ago.