• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

TTIP and CETA close to dead

Status
Not open for further replies.
Elizabeth Warren talking about TPP, and why it's a disaster; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWXJJy_Tq-U < I think parts of it sums up adequetely how a lot of people feel about TTIP, given they have many similarities.


Making Food Safety operate in Europe more in a fashion like the FDA, is laughable. The FDA which is infamous for allowing untested supplements and substances to marked, and only removing them after people have gotten sick. It's a organization which is known for having poor regulatory oversight and power, leaving the manufactureres to police themselves. John Oliver had a interesting segment on this regarding Supplements being unregulated; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA0wKeokWUU
They (corporations) always sell oversight, regulations and accountability as something that hurts job growth, and less revenue, and will be worse for consumers. But time and time again, have corporations shown themselves not to be allowed to police themselves.


In recent years there has been a slew of SDIS - Cases where a private corporation sues an entire country. Like how a hedgefund essentially brought Argentina or default, or how TransCanada is able to sue the 15 US government over lost revenue of the Keystone Pipeline. Think about it. A corporate entity. Suing an entire fucking country. It's a neoliberal nightmare.
Supposedly- From what I have heard about TTIP, corporations from all over would be able to sue and have legislative power on their side. So for example, if Belgium wanted to put a sugar tax on products with a certain amount of sugar- Nestle or some other Sugar Giant, might sue Belgium. That sounds crazy, but it isn't really that strange or uncommon.
Currently a US energy giant is suing Germany over having withdrawn from Nuclear post-Fukushima. The fear is that trade deals like this will remove the hinges and give corporations a lot more of predatory power to squeeze wherever there is someone hurting them from getting their maximized revenue.

When people say that trade deals like this is a good idea, they are only thinking about the net positives. Not the protection laws you usurp, for achiving that profit. Yes, America has a very high degree of corporate mobility and that certainly helps its entrepreneurship. But America also has weak worker protection and union laws. It doesn't take care of its weakest and there is little oversight or accountability.

Then there are the draconian copyright laws which essentially makes it illegal to cosplay as a copyrighted character, mod or remove DRM from a game, or how it incentives composers / producers over artists and creators. Hench their hard dicks for lobbying for it so hard. There is a financial angle for this deal, and that's their own. Not the protection or benefits for consumers.
So I wish people would stop thinking that people are mad because jobs are lost. These deals are designed to circumvent china, brazil and china, and to keep them out. I guess you cannot blame EU and US wanting to hold on to their bread while fucking over others, but this is not true open marked economies. The whole point of TTIP is that there is serious ramifications for not accepting TTIP over its overlap with TPP. There has been many who have been scared what would happen if they didn't accept it.

These sorts of trade deals will make it much more difficult for upstarts to emerge into the market and brew new healthy competition. You end up with a few mega corporations who end up creating near monopolies where there is little competition. And with those copyright and trademark clauses it will be much harder much harder to get anything new going.

I completely fail to see how anyone can see the benefit in this. These deals have little to do with trade.
 

G.ZZZ

Member
TTIP was about so much more than just food. It would've given big multinational companies even more power (i.e. the ability to sue countries if they ever did anything remotely negatively impacting to those companies; say a country not letting a mining company proceed with mining to protect nature -> the mining company could sue and would probably win), it would've neutered environmental protection a lot at a time when it should be strengthened as much as possible and generally just put the general populace at a worse position when it comes to their rights vs. big corporations. EU would probably have lost a lot of jobs & been generally worse off economically as well.

From what i've read about the arbitration aspect, it was far more mild that it was usually depicted, but still, it was a precedent and i didn't like in any shape or form.
 

Moosichu

Member
Don't worry America! You can now trade with glorious Britain who are free form the chackles of the EU! We bring trade and prosperity, we even have a National Health Service which is being sold off and you don't want to miss that cash cow while it's around!
 

Famassu

Member
From what i've read about the arbitration aspect, it was far more mild that it was usually depicted, but still, it was a precedent and i didn't like in any shape or form.
It's one of those things which supporters of TTIP were all "but no one is ever going to take advantage of it (in such gross ways)" about when anyone who isn't a naive 7-year-old knows that any & every big corporation would have taken advantage of it so quickly that probably all of EU would be sued the second TTIP was a done deal.
 

davepoobond

you can't put a price on sparks
yep, saw that coming with the turmoil of the EU right now.

unfortunately this will embolden Russia even further to see the cooperation between America and Europe break down as Europe begins to break apart or at least show visible cracks.

Ukraine who? Crimea what? The Syrian war will go on forever if Russia has its way, IMO.
 
It's one of those things which supporters of TTIP were all "but no one is ever going to take advantage of it (in such gross ways)" about when anyone who isn't a naive 7-year-old knows that any & every big corporation would have taken advantage of it so quickly that probably all of EU would be sued the second TTIP was a done deal.
That, and if they truly weren't going to use it, they don't need it as an option. There's no need to open the door to even the possibility--not to mention how scary it is to give corporations power over sovereign governments in the first place.
 
Obama wants to push through TTP so countries can't fine Microsofe/google 5 billion dollars like EU did. It's not going to happen.
 
That's too bad. That's just going to protect inefficient companies in the US and EU. But I guess too many people are buying into populist and wrong economic rhetoric right now.
 

Dennis

Banned
the EU wants its protected origin designations (basically any item with a location in the name must be produced in that location or drop the name, e.g. champagne must be produced in the Champagne region)

The most righteous, justified, and sensible thing the EU has ever championed.
 

Condom

Member
That's too bad. That's just going to protect inefficient companies in the US and EU. But I guess too many people are buying into populist and wrong economic rhetoric right now.

everyone who does not want to be sued by corporations is a populist!

pro big business economics is the only right economics! fuck off poor people!
 

darkace

Banned
The numbers I've seen were that the gains are fairly small because existing trade barriers are already so damn low. The main problems with these treaties are the ISDS systems (allowing companies to sue states for "lost revenue") and the US pushing more restrictive IP laws on others (e.g. the EU doesn't allow software patents, other concerns were patent medicine access for poorer nations though that's probably more for the Pacific version TPP). They had EU citizens especially worried about lawsuits over environmental or consumer protection laws as the US is notoriously lax on those.

The ISDS doesn't allow companies to sue for lost revenue, the IP concerns are largely unfounded as TTIP doesn't touch upon fair use and allows each member state to set their own terms, and medicine for poorer countries is accessible mostly free through TRIPS and TTIP won't impact this.

You can't sue over environmental or consumer protection laws either unless they disproportionately impact a foreign company over a domestic or don't have empirical basis.
 

GSG Flash

Nobody ruins my family vacation but me...and maybe the boy!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37731955

So it looks like CETA still had some hope of passing but talks are now breaking down thanks to one province in Belgium. Not a good look for the EU tbh...

I was actually looking forward to this as a Canadian because it would challenge the multiple greedy oligopoly we have in Canada, while providing the EU access to our market at the same time. I feel the opposition to this is quite shortsighted.
 

norinrad

Member
Canadian minister was pretty upset about the whole thing. Hehehehe

I was literally, I mean literally surprised that they was no strong opposition from France. I guess blocking highways to mess with people's vacations only happens in the summer lol
 

Brandson

Member
Canadian here. I import a lot from Europe because Canada doesn't produce that much, and some European products are quite high quality. Was looking forward to eliminated or reduced duties on all sorts of things. That excitement was dampened somewhat with UK pulling out of the EU meaning duties on UK goods would remain in place. Nevertheless, with how easy it is to order goods over the internet, having duties on non-fungible consumer goods makes no sense. It seems quite short-sighted to retain barriers to selling your products to other countries.
 

sankt-Antonio

:^)--?-<
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37731955

So it looks like CETA still had some hope of passing but talks are now breaking down thanks to one province in Belgium. Not a good look for the EU tbh...

I was actually looking forward to this as a Canadian because it would challenge the multiple greedy oligopoly we have in Canada, while providing the EU access to our market at the same time. I feel the opposition to this is quite shortsighted.

CETA would have been a TTIP in disguise for American companies to funnel their agenda through Canada. That would be my fear, and i hope they start again with a transparent way of negotiating.
 
Good. I'm sorry guys, but I don't want US food (and its inherent lack of regulation) in the EU.

We don't have the level of consumer protection we need in place, but let's not act like the US is a 3rd world country. Our food is regulated. My wife, who is a public health veterinarian with the USDA, works 60 hours a week to ensure our meat supply is safe for consumption.
 
It's really incredible how impertinent the Canadian Trade Minister is:

"It seems evident for me and for Canada that the European Union is not now capable of having an international accord even with a country that has values as European as Canada."

The European Union is perfectly capable of having international accords. They just aren't willing to having your shitty accord. Deal with it.
 

Purkake4

Banned
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37731955

So it looks like CETA still had some hope of passing but talks are now breaking down thanks to one province in Belgium. Not a good look for the EU tbh...

I was actually looking forward to this as a Canadian because it would challenge the multiple greedy oligopoly we have in Canada, while providing the EU access to our market at the same time. I feel the opposition to this is quite shortsighted.
Calling basically half of Belgium "one province in Belgium" is a bit insulting TBH. Not to mention that most federal countries like Germany or Austria need consent from all its states to pass a law, trade treaties included.
 

GSG Flash

Nobody ruins my family vacation but me...and maybe the boy!
Calling basically half of Belgium "one province in Belgium" is a bit insulting TBH. Not to mention that most federal countries like Germany or Austria need consent from all its states to pass a law, trade treaties included.

How is it insulting when it's true...?

Or are you claiming that there was more than one province involved in the deal falling apart?
 

G.O.O.

Member
Regardless of the content of the agreement I'm pissed to see that only one of the 38 parliaments in EU can overrun the whole deal. We really need to get this shit fixed or there will be no point in the single market anymore.
 

Pedrito

Member
The real winners are the lawyers.

There's also the notion that corporations can sue but individuals can't.

How so?

Regardless of the content of the agreement I'm pissed to see that only one of the 38 parliaments in EU can overrun the whole deal. We really need to get this shit fixed or there will be no point in the single market anymore.

1/3 of one parliament actually.
 

Purkake4

Banned
How is it insulting when it's true...?

Or are you claiming that there was more than one province involved in the deal falling apart?
Well, Belgium is a federal state made up of 3 regions (it's a bit more complicated than that, but that's not super relevant at the moment). The region in question here, Wallonia makes up 55% of Belgium's territory and around 1/3 of its population. In that region are 5 provinces with 43 arrondissements with 589 municipalities.

Saying that it's a province is literally wrong.

Not to mention that Romania and Bulgaria are also against CETA.
 

KDR_11k

Member
Canadian here. I import a lot from Europe because Canada doesn't produce that much, and some European products are quite high quality. Was looking forward to eliminated or reduced duties on all sorts of things. That excitement was dampened somewhat with UK pulling out of the EU meaning duties on UK goods would remain in place. Nevertheless, with how easy it is to order goods over the internet, having duties on non-fungible consumer goods makes no sense. It seems quite short-sighted to retain barriers to selling your products to other countries.

Nobody is objecting to lower trade barriers, it's the other laws that give more power to corporations over humans that are the problem. OTOH I don't know what it's like in Canada but in Europe the VAT you have to pay on imports is usually far higher than the actual duty and from what the customs official I asked told me that part would not go away with these free trade agreements anyway.

Regardless of the content of the agreement I'm pissed to see that only one of the 38 parliaments in EU can overrun the whole deal. We really need to get this shit fixed or there will be no point in the single market anymore.

Keep in mind that people were marching in the streets against CETA, that's gotta weaken the resolve of the politicians to pass this thing and make them more likely to accept objections like this. Gives them a way to say to international partnets it's not their fault that it didn't pass without making their electorate angry over passing it.

For reference, the German supreme court forced Germany to accept CETA only with the option to unilaterally withdraw from the treaty. That's already a pretty grave weakening.
 

Purkake4

Banned
We WERE against it but, as it is good old austrian tradition,, our politicians changed their opinions from a "no" to a "yes but" to a "yes please" without much reasoning.
Stuff's moving at lightning speed then. I remember an article from like 2 days ago about Romania being against it unless it would get visa-free travel along with it instantly.
 

Dre

Member
Regardless of the content of the agreement I'm pissed to see that only one of the 38 parliaments in EU can overrun the whole deal. We really need to get this shit fixed or there will be no point in the single market anymore.

It's actually pretty sad that only one out of those 38 parliaments took the concerns of its voters seriously. Huge parts of the German and Austrian population are also against CETA, yet their respective politicians didn't care and carried on with it despite all those people demonstrating in the streets.
 
It's actually pretty sad that only one out of those 38 parliaments took the concerns of its voters seriously. Huge parts of the German and Austrian population are also against CETA, yet their respective politicians didn't care and carried on with it despite all those people demonstrating in the streets.

I think their objection has more to do with electoral issues. The Parti Socialiste has been losing hard in recent polls to the communist party FTB. PS went from 32% to 25% and FTB went from 5% to 16%. Giving in would have been another major blow to their appeal to communist voters.
 

mdubs

Banned
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37731955

So it looks like CETA still had some hope of passing but talks are now breaking down thanks to one province in Belgium. Not a good look for the EU tbh...

I was actually looking forward to this as a Canadian because it would challenge the multiple greedy oligopoly we have in Canada, while providing the EU access to our market at the same time. I feel the opposition to this is quite shortsighted.
I certainly won't have anything nice to say about Belgium for a while, I was looking forward to our dairy cartel having some competition. Shrugs
 

G.O.O.

Member
It's actually pretty sad that only one out of those 38 parliaments took the concerns of its voters seriously. Huge parts of the German and Austrian population are also against CETA, yet their respective politicians didn't care and carried on with it despite all those people demonstrating in the streets.
I understand that some voters are against it but I think it's one of these cases where the mps should vote according to their countries' interests, not just listen to the voters.

Doesn't mean the treaty would have passed but I'd trust an elected official more than a random citizen on that matter. We tend to think that other countries just aim to enslave us.
 

norinrad

Member
As long as Wallonia allows the Canadian lobster to slip true, we are good. I love me some lobster whenever I go there every year. Yeah I will never get sick of visiting Belgium for good food lol.

The other Canadian stuff should be sold to the USA. They love chemical food down there hahaha :p
 
Not much of an economist but are not the tariffs already so low that there is very little monetary gains from these? Ive seen some analysis that I wish I could remember the names of but that was the jist of it.

furthermore, since I disagree/am skeptical with the idea that free trade and interdependence will lead to better happiness and peace I find this to be a good thing. As an old biased prof once said, "free trade isnt an economic problem, its an ideological one"

As a Canadian, Im curious to our governments response. They were mum on the issue of the TPP during the election (wouldnt say they leaned any given way) this should be interesting and could give us an idea of the liberals moving forward.
 
Random minor thing to note. There apparently has been an EUComm-official CETA translation into EU member languages or something. The Polish translation of this thing managed to completely flip the meaning of a certain clause from pro-GMO to anti-GMO, and most of the debates and local reasoning used the translation. Needless to say, no one is really happy about this - or maybe about this surfacing, I don't know.
 

Alucrid

Banned
the EU wants its protected origin designations (basically any item with a location in the name must be produced in that location or drop the name, e.g. champagne must be produced in the Champagne region) which the US of course doesn't want

fuck da eu, bring back freedom fries
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
fuck da eu, bring back freedom fries

Doesn't the US also have this kind of protection for some products? Were they proposing dropping both sets of protection?

I like it - in the end it's just a name anyway. If you buy champagne or Parmesan you know where it's from. Doesn't guarantee quality, and you can still buy the copycat product if you want - just look beyond the name




As for Wallander messing things up - that goes to the heart of the European question. Do we want to move forward on the basis of consensus, or should individual states give up national powers and allow simple majorities to decide important matters that will affect everyone (which will surely lead to the big boys dominating things)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom