• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Games Journalism! Wainwright/Florence/Tomb Raider/Eurogamer/Libel Threats/Doritos

Status
Not open for further replies.

Majukun

Member
Both are a out speaking the truth. Integrity. Someone lieing to benefit from it has no integrity. Someone making truthful (easily backed up with evidence) observations and the cencoring them ar the first sign of trouble has no integrity either. If you lie or omit the truth for any reason, you cn't possibly stand on any higher ground that the other.

in one case speaking the truth has no price whatsoever..in the other case you have to defend yourself in a court,spending a lot of money that maybe you don't even have.

i'm not saying that they did the right thing,or that this was the only possible outcome for this situation,but you have made equal two situations that are nothing alike
 

Jburton

Banned
I'm not going to get too deeply involved in this thread as I personally know many of those involved, but...

RE: The Lauren/Tomb Raider thing - that I didn't like. Rab has every right to call people out on the PS3 thing, it was questionable and dodgy. Feel free to get out your pitchforks and hunt to your hearts' content - I would never have entered that competition personally, and that's a personal decision and my personal stance on it. Others differ. Fair enough, each to their own. Also feel free to question Lauren supporting the people and saying she saw no problem. Fine. Whatever. That stuff is morally questionable and Rab/EG had and have every right to call it out.

However - the doubting/questioning Lauren simply because she likes Tomb Raider is really rather distressing. Are journalists not allowed to be excited for games any more? Lauren has been someone who bounced with excitement for Tomb Raider forever. Since before she was in the job professionally, when she was just doing it for fun on her blog and whatever. If all our journalists are meant to not be fans of games or excited for them, it leaves us in a pretty fucking sad place.

The rest of this story can be debated to the ends of the earth as far as I'm concerned, but the simple idea that somebody is in a company's pocket because they excitedly tweet about a game in a natural manner (IE without a shitty promoted hash tag as part of a competition, or in a tweet that reads like an ad) is just insanity. If other reasons arise to suggest they might be - working for them, taking loads of freebies, whatever - then feel free to ask that question. If you want to scrutinize the rest of her work and her past to try to make a deeper connection, then do. If you find something, then it's justified. If somebody puts a video up of themselves singing and dancing around with the game box, again, feel free to ask that question - as that shows questionable judgement as well just looking plain dodgy.

But what kind of world do we live in where somebody can't simply be excited?

Has freelanced for Square Enix, articles by her about Tomb Raider have been posted and look like nothing more PR / advertising for the game.

I believe taking the point of view that she is simply excited in the face of the evidence is naive as hell.
 
it's not about being excited. you're misrepresenting him.

it's about how not being ethical with regard to the ps3 stuff makes you suspicious of everything else they do - as being a journalist requires the readers to trust what you are saying is honest opinion.

if she was excited about tomb raider without the ps3 comment or any other impropriety issues it wouldn't be a problem.

Respectfully, I think you're too close to this and, as a result, you're missing the point. John Walker has articulated it better than I could:

Fair points. Good points. I'm just terrified of reaching this point where a tweet about being excited for a game pre-release invalidates your opinion or review score further down the line. It's about self control, I guess - expressing excitement without being an ad, or doing the Skyrim review copy dance. I'm just talking about that specifically, really. Like I say, the PS3 stuff left as bad a taste in my mouth as any of you.

Has freelanced for Square Enix, articles by her about Tomb Raider have been posted and look like nothing more PR / advertising for the game.

I believe taking the point of view that she is simply excited in the face of the evidence is naive as hell.

None of that was in the original article or surfaced when I wrote that post, though. See me holding my hands up above. I even say in that very post "If there's more evidence, then it's okay," and I believe that. I agree with John Walker's position entirely (man is a genius, you'd be mad not to) but some of the tone of this whole series of events worries me.
 

jwhit28

Member
Real journalists with integrity don't put up with that shit from corporations

You don't really have a choice but to step in that grey area when your biggest advertisers are the makers of the products you are critiquing. Big publishers control the purse strings, the access to the product, and the things you are allowed to talk about pre-release. Throw in the backlash from fans when reviews don't drool over their favorite games and it becomes quite easy to just play along.
 

Bedlam

Member
However - the doubting/questioning Lauren simply because she likes Tomb Raider is really rather distressing. Are journalists not allowed to be excited for games any more? Lauren has been someone who bounced with excitement for Tomb Raider forever. Since before she was in the job professionally, when she was just doing it for fun on her blog and whatever. If all our journalists are meant to not be fans of games or excited for them, it leaves us in a pretty fucking sad place.
Who called her out for liking Tomb Raider? That wasn't the point of the original "Table of Doritos" article at all.
 

erpg

GAF parliamentarian
Have to say Mr Walker hits on one of the things I find most bizarre about the entire incident. Your a journalist, your job is to write, why didnt Ms Wainright simply write a response to Mr Florence's article? If she had she could have garnered some respect and at least the appearance of professionalism. As it is she not only makes herself look guilty, she makes herself look like something of an idiot as well
It's telling, considering accusations that she's just a straw for siphoning talking points from PR.
 

CrunchinJelly

formerly cjelly
Either EG have removed the comments, my browser's being shit, I've been banned, or their site is getting hammered.

Can't decide which.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
If you want quality journalism free of bias and salesmanship... you're going to have to pay someone... someone that deserves to be paid well because if they're to do a good job, they'll need intelligence and integrity and experience.


Question is... if your advertisers are also the target of your content... and been critical of the content sours the relationship with your advertisers...

Where are you going to get your money from?

Are people willing to pay $30 for a magazine or a month's worth of game-journalism, at the volumes required to make this a worthwhile endeavour?

The simple blunt truth of the matter is that the economics of the industry unfortunately don't really allow for much in the way of integrity.


If you want to know the downlow monkey town, peruse GAF. We're always happy to set a fire under the industry's ass. There's some gold here, if you can wade through all the nuggets of shit that float by.


I'd like to know if this is an issue with other specialist press too. There are hundreds, probably thousands of publications on specialist areas - movies, knitting, music, dogs, whatever.

Surely most of them rely on advertising at least partly from the companies they write articles about. Most of them review products supplied by said companies.

I suppose they have to have good relationships with the PR teams of the car/movie/knitting companies in order to get hold of products to preview/review on time and sell in advertising.

Is games any different?
 

BigDes

Member
Who called her out for liking Tomb Raider? That wasn't the point of the original "Table of Doritos" article at all.

Although lets be clear here, her claiming to be a giant fan of tomb raider and emblazoning er Twitter with pictures of the game is also kinda weak, given that she lists Square Enix as a current employer.
 
So why did he quit his job then? Why won't he write his column on Eurogamer if he really thinks they are not to blame? What am I missing here?
This might have been covered in the last two pages already, but I've seen it a lot in the thread so far.

I'm pretty sure Rab writes for Eurogamer on a freelance basis so it's not like it's walked straight out of a job or anything. Not that makes his actions less noble or somehow questionable; it's good to be able to afford morals in this business.
 

Uthred

Member
The rest of this story can be debated to the ends of the earth as far as I'm concerned, but the simple idea that somebody is in a company's pocket because they excitedly tweet about a game in a natural manner (IE without a shitty promoted hash tag as part of a competition, or in a tweet that reads like an ad) is just insanity.

But what kind of world do we live in where somebody can't simply be excited?

It may indeed be insanity, but whether it is or isnt is not particularly relevant as it wasnt what Mr Florence was saying, or implying. He was pointing out how the appearance of overly-fervent support could cause the reader to question the journalists integrity. Perhaps you should try addressing what was written as opposed to trying to reframe it in order to make it seem absurd?
 

BigDes

Member
I wonder if a lot of this suspicion could be somewhat alleviated if along with any review of a particular game there was a breakdown of whatever shit the Publisher sent them along with the review disc

So if say the reviewer was flown out to a foreign and was asked to review the game under controlled conditions like GTA IV I think it was then there would be disclosure of this somewhere in the article.
 

megalowho

Member
The picture sums up game journalism in one nice picture. They are tools to sell us things.
The problem is too many people on the internet would rather post a gif to get a cheap lol instead of taking the time to form an actual opinion. It works once, then quickly becomes lazy shorthand for discussion. Things just aren't that black and white, as convenient as it might be.
 

Xater

Member

This part is just too delicious:

Let me categorically state that Lauren Wainwright certainly doesn’t have her Twitter page emblazoned in images from the forthcoming Tomb Raider game for any reason that could be understood to be corrupt. Yes, she vociferously defended a journalist’s right to promote a game for personal gain – in supporting the PS3 competition – on that Twitter page, and yes, if you were the sort of person who wanted to get threatened, you might mistakenly conflate the two. However, Wainwright states that she is simply a massive fan of this unreleased game, and with what I believe to be naive enthusiasm, hasn’t thought through the negative implications of making her Twitter page look like it’s sponsored. It isn’t. Even though Wainwright publicly lists Square Enix (screencap for when that inevitably gets edited out) as one of her current employers. However, don’t point out that possible confu
 
I wonder if a lot of this suspicion could be somewhat alleviated if along with any review of a particular game there was a breakdown of whatever shit the Publisher sent them along with the review disc

So if say the reviewer was flown out to a foreign and was asked to review the game under controlled conditions like GTA IV I think it was then there would be disclosure of this somewhere in the article.

It certainly wouldn't hurt. We didn't know about all of the questionable things that went on with the GTA4 review until a month after its release.
 
I don't mind Geoff. He doesn't walk around pretending like he is more than what he is. And that is a host. A TV show host, an internet show host, etc....and when he wants to be he is a better writer than most out there. When he does review things I've never once thought anything suspicious if it. But I get why it looks murky for sure. Hard to take their opinion on upcoming halo seriously.

As for this other controversy. I think the article calling people out is a little low. Just do it in generalities or subliminals. No way calling people out by name song giving then the rundown was going to end well.
 

Majukun

Member
However - the doubting/questioning Lauren simply because she likes Tomb Raider is really rather distressing. Are journalists not allowed to be excited for games any more? Lauren has been someone who bounced with excitement for Tomb Raider forever. Since before she was in the job professionally, when she was just doing it for fun on her blog and whatever. If all our journalists are meant to not be fans of games or excited for them, it leaves us in a pretty fucking sad place.

it's what came when you become a journalist.You can have your opinion,but you can publicly state it if your job is to give impartial opinions.Plus,you can't do what is basically paid advertising with your twitter account if you want to have credibility as a journalist.
the entire point of the article wasn't that the industry is corrupted,or that gaming journalist can't like a franchise..but that many of these "journalist" don't know shit about what being a journalist is about,what are the rules,what you can do and what you can't.
 

kafiend

Member
Have to say Mr Walker hits on one of the things I find most bizarre about the entire incident. You're a journalist, your job is to write, why didnt Ms Wainright simply write a response to Mr Florence's article? If she had she could have garnered some respect and at least the appearance of professionalism. As it is she not only makes herself look guilty, she makes herself look like something of an idiot as well

You can't write a response when you just got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
 

Jac_Solar

Member
News International could very easily have bankrupted Eurogamer just by dragging out the libel case.

Libel cases in the UK are very serious and can be very expensive and I wouldn't put it past the company to drag out the claim just long enough to sink Eurogamer

In cases like this, or any case related to someone suing, wouldn't it be entirely logical and reasonable to make the plaintiff pay for all the defendants bills related to the court (Lawyer, whatever else.), and if any research is needed, the courts would make the plaintiff pay (Through the courts.) for an anonymous company hired by the courts.


Something along those lines would prevent careless, rich and/or moneygrabbing psychopaths from suing over minor stuff. I mean, it's absurd that anyone can take ANYONE to the courts.

Ie a case like someone suing a company over what a journalist said would require the plaintiff to pay every single penny, including covering salaries if a court meeting is held during work hours.
 
Had never heard of this lauren wainwright character. Overnight internet sensation much? From nobody to poster-child for all that's wrong with games "journalism."
HNNGNGFNGNGNNNGGNGNG

Hardly a nobody I'd say. She was on a popular podcast with Jim Sterling for a while, it's where I knew her from.
 

Ban Puncher

Member
Aye Fat Rab, you'll always have my support, matey.


GmwS0.jpg




TEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAM!!!
 

Omikaru

Member
The major problem this situation creates comes with how anyone writing for Eurogamer from this moment on is going to feel - that under any threat of libel, Eurogamer will cave and edit their articles.

It's going to create a chilling effect whereby any Eurogamer writer will now self-edit to avoid saying anything that could even remotely be construed as libelous, even when it can clearly be argued not to be.

I agree, and it's very unfortunate.

There are no winners in this. Rab has lost a commission, Eurogamer's staff have lost the security of freedom of speech, and Lauren Wainwright has wholesale fucked her credibility as a journalist.
 
As for this other controversy. I think the article calling people out is a little low. Just do it in generalities or subliminals. No way calling people out by name song giving then the rundown was going to end well.

I don't think that there was anything wrong with calling people out by name if he feels that they're doing something questionable. The problem with what he did is that he later mentioned that he has a mental list of journalists that he feels are shady, but he refused to list them.
 

PaulLFC

Member
Any suggestions for a title? I'll PM a mod and ask them to change the title of this because more people need to know what's gone on here. Threatening action over that was, and is, disgusting.
 
I don't think that there was anything wrong with calling people out by name if he feels that they're doing something questionable. The problem with what he did is that he later mentioned that he has a list of people that he has a mental list of journalists that he feels are shady, but he refused to list them.
Yeah I guess if you're going to go there then go all the way rather than singling out.
 

BigDes

Member
In cases like this, or any case related to someone suing, wouldn't it be entirely logical and reasonable to make the plaintiff pay for all the defendants bills related to the court (Lawyer, whatever else.), and if any research is needed, the courts would make the plaintiff pay (Through the courts.) for an anonymous company hired by the courts.


Something along those lines would prevent careless, rich and/or moneygrabbing psychopaths from suing over minor stuff. I mean, it's absurd that anyone can take ANYONE to the courts.

Ie a case like someone suing a company over what a journalist said would require the plaintiff to pay every single penny, including covering salaries if a court meeting is held during work hours.

Well the problem with that is that these costs are only awarded once the case is done

and the lawyers you hire aren't going to wait for a year or however long for you to pay them while the case is ongoing, so you have to pay and then wait for the court or other party to reimburse you (which can also take ages or be whittled down on any appeal).

So by the time you actually get the money, the damage may have already been done.
 

Uthred

Member
You can't write a response when you just got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.

I think explaining why your hand may or not be in the cookie jar (Schrodeinger's hand?) is a much better approach than screaming "SHUT UP, SHUT UP, SHUT UP" i.e. calling in the law
 

Krabboss

Member
My question is why is she obsessed with a series as mediocre as Tomb Raider? That's the reason I can't trust anything she says, more than anything.
 
I agree, and it's very unfortunate.

There are no winners in this. Rab has lost a commission, Eurogamer's staff have lost the security of freedom of speech, and Lauren Wainwright has wholesale fucked her credibility as a journalist.
Gonna say something slightly inflammatory because I actually feel really discouraged about all this.

In response to the quote above, Lauren Wainwright can just say,

"who cares."

In this world concerned with capital, advertising, and "raping" every single thing that was once beautiful with dollar signs, she can and will continue to write whatever drivel she wants. The money world does not care about integrity, just about profit. Things will continue to spiral downward until there is no more meaning, just mountain dew and doritos.

BTW, my dictionary spell checker on firefox is trying to make me capitalize doritos. Fuck that
 

Fistwell

Member
Hardly a nobody I'd say. She was on a popular podcast with Jim Sterling for a while, it's where I knew her from.
I'm only vaguely aware of who Jim Sterling is, so maybe it's only me who had no previous knowledge of Miss HNNGNGFNGNGNNNGGNGNG.

http://www.laurenwainwright.com/?p=2790

Just leaving this here, A 20 page FAQ on how you go from writing about tomb raider to getting a job as a community manager for tomb raider.
Dang, she actually has her own page/blog thing.

Any suggestions for a title? I'll PM a mod and ask them to change the title of this because more people need to know what's gone on here. Threatening action over that was, and is, disgusting.
Lauren Wainwright; Nu Games Journalism (Buy Tomb Raider, out March 2013)
 

Bleep

Member
GAF>Internet>GAF?

The screenshot was actually originally taken by a poster on Something Awful, he started posting it out of context in threads a week ago as a joke. http://forums.somethingawful.com/sh...25385&pagenumber=285&perpage=40#post408659686

It's really funny to see this spread and become a big thing that people are kicking up a fuss about. I'm surprised people haven't been more paying attention to the original video, this line in particular is funny: "You can impress your friends if you drink enough Mountain Dew and Doritos."
 
This a quite sad event, Rab article put on the spotlight how some game journalists care so little about integrity, on purpose or not that it may be hurting the profession, and well basically in GAF gaming journaslism is a joke except for a few cases.

And with things like that is normal.

Everyone read the John Walker piece, he nails it:

http://botherer.org/2012/10/25/an-utter-disgrace/

Very good article on the whole mess.
 
Can you imagine the chest-beating "The people have a right to know!" mantra that these guys would be hammering all over the place if a game dev or publisher (or anyone outside of games journalism/pr) responded to such questionable lack of ethics as this? Gotta use that click-bait to advance your personal cred, right?

But no. When it comes to your own, the wagons circle, the notion of transparency gets kicked down the cellar and the victim card gets played.




Disclosure: I like TombRaider games and sometimes eat Doritos
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom