Of course you can enjoy that film, just like people can not enjoy it.Just gave it another rewatch because of this thread.
Still holds up.
Edit: Oh, went through and read the thread. Can't we just enjoy a movie? Maybe?
It feels like a fake ass movie. I do agree that it is well executed but in the end it feels like an empty shell. All show and no substance underneath.I don't think it is a bad film. It's a Hollywood film for sure, but it's well directed with great special effects and period pieces. The acting in general is very good throughout, so I'm not sure how you can just say it is a bad film all around.
You may not like the film, but it's certainly better than most "bad" films. I'm not even a huge fan of the film, but it's a good film IMO.
It's a maudlin piece of credulous mainstream boomer-worshipping horseshit.
It's underlying message is that even if you're dumb as a post, as long as you exhibit US values (enlist in the army, do what you're told, be Christian, salute the flag) you will be rewarded with fame, riches, children, and get to meet all the rockstars and even Presidents that walk the earth at the same time as you.
If you try to fight the system or get involved with the counterculture, like Jenny does, you will literally catch AIDS and die. Subtle.
The movie also can't resist making the Black Panthers into a hate group, which is probably exactly how white baby-boomers, by and for whom this movie was clearly made, saw them. To say nothing of portraying anti-war protestors like assholes (the president of the Berkeley chapter of the SDS smacks Jenny around at one point for fuck's sake - which I guess is cool with the Black Panthers, who glower at Forrest brandishing firearms while kicking him out of their meeting for daring to retaliate to a woman getting beat up).
In 1995 The National Fucking Review named it one of the "Best Conservative Movies" of all time, then in 2009, ranked it number four on its "25 Best Conservative Movies of the Last 25 Years" list.
Let's hear from them about how great this movie is!
It's really well made and there are sections, specific character arcs within it that I do kinda like but thematically it's fucking insipid for sure. Also fuck all the way off with the 'why are you reading so much into it, just have fun' anti-intellectual bullshit, that attitude is why we get media that oppresses people in the first place. 'You're not supposed to critically analyse Birth of a Nation, it's all just fun at the movies, you're reading too much into it if you think it's racist', 'stop thinking about Triumph of the Will, just enjoy it man'
No one is saying stop thinking. You are overreacting again here like a lot of the people that are getting their opinions dissected. What people have basically said is that the movie is too tame to even have this crazy ultra conservative slant people are trying to demonize it with.
Zemeckis is also a known liberal.
http://screenprism.com/insights/article/can-forrest-gump-be-viewed-as-conservative-propaganda
Here you go: basically quotes from all major parties saying this movie has nothing to do any of this shit brought up in this thread. Wow, should I trust over eager analysts that want to bring racism into everything, or the actual filmmakers who are very liberal?
I do agree the counter culture is not presented in a great light in SOME instances, but whatever it's a tame film that just wants to show people some snazzy effects and great acting.
This thread is plagued with such classic over-analysis that I feel like everyone here is just playing a joke on everyone else. It's a straight up entertainment critic parody in here.
This is such a piece of shit post, breh. Let people who actually care about these things talk about the political messages and you can just enjoy your maudlin, conservative, historical whitewash fantasy over there somewhere. If you really don't get how characters stand in for the cultures they come from in a movie where all these various groups are flashing by, then maybe you shouldn't be commenting on things like what the subtexts or implications are when you make the black resistance look like violent thugs, anti-war protestors into woman-beaters, hippies into drug addicts, and on and on. I really don't care what you think about how "overthought" these observations are, particularly when conservative groups agree that the messages are there and applaud the movie for having them.This is such over-thought dreck I can't even believe I'm reading it. You're implying that meaning exists where it simply doesn't. The whole point of the movie is there's a world out there with a bunch of hostile bullshit that means nothing (like your post),and then there's Forrest, a simple guy with love in his heart who wanders into crazy success just because it's funny and interesting. That's it. You're focusing on the wrong stuff, dude.
The Black Panthers weren't realized very well in the movie I'll give you that, but Jenny's boyfriend was the antagonist in that scene, the rest was kind of just background noise.
Edit: and Jenny is portrayed as a confused girl, born into abuse, resulting in bad decisions. The movie doesn't intend to make her or counterculture look bad, if anything Forest also falls under that category...he doesn't know whats happening in the war and does nothing but help people after he's thrown in the shit. He's as peace loving as the hippies.
Retarded guy just encountered an SJW. Guess who's smarter.
Who's the baby killer?' What a loser. I had a lot of liberal professors like him in college. Gave me bad grades for being conservative. Morons.
Vietnam War: $584,000,000,000. Beating lefty faggot up: Priceless.
fucking hippie faggot deserved it
Go on Forrest! Brutalize that Hippie scumbag!
Bloody leftist nutjobs
Fuck this movie.
This is such over-thought dreck I can't even believe I'm reading it. You're implying that meaning exists where it simply doesn't. The whole point of the movie is there's a world out there with a bunch of hostile bullshit that means nothing (like your post),and then there's Forrest, a simple guy with love in his heart who wanders into crazy success just because it's funny and interesting. That's it. You're focusing on the wrong stuff, dude.
Shawshank Redemption should've won the oscar for best movie that year.
That scene toward the end when Gump says "Is he smart ... Or is he... " Looking down with the implied "like me" just hanging there, and Jenny jumping in before he can give voice to the thought.
In that instant, you can see Forest, having come to terms with his own inabilities, yet realizing their difficulty and hoping against all hope his child doesn't have to live through them. The knowledge of a lack of knowledge and how it haunts an entire life. Forest is often "lucky" but seen from his own confused perspective, life might be a struggle to understand the basics. He relies on lessons from his mom and friends, almost rigidly so, to help make sense to a world that is largely chaotic. We think of this as cute or adorable, because we understand the events and context, but he's holding onto these things like a life raft in an uncertain sea. In that single scene, even as a much more confident cheerful adult, we suddenly see how vulnerable Gump is.
That scene sends shivers up my spine and I think it is perhaps some of the best acting I have ever seen. That Hanks conveyed so much in just mere seconds, I can never forget.
"Dumb guy being successful by accident" not only was the running gag in the movie, it was practically its selling premise. How do you mistake that as a morality the movie trying to pass on to you. The only morality the movie sell was "life is like a box of chocolate, you never know what you are going to get."
Shawshank Redemption should've won the oscar for best movie that year.
Of course you can enjoy that film, just like people can not enjoy it.
What you probably shouldn't do though is whine about the fact that the people who didn't are willing to articulate what they didn't like about the movie.
This is such a piece of shit post, breh. Let people who actually care about these things talk about the political messages and you can just enjoy your maudlin, conservative, historical whitewash fantasy over there somewhere. If you really don't get how characters stand in for the cultures they come from in a movie where all these various groups are flashing by, then maybe you shouldn't be commenting on things like what the subtexts or implications are when you make the black resistance look like violent thugs, anti-war protestors into woman-beaters, hippies into drug addicts, and on and on. I really don't care what you think about how "overthought" these observations are, particularly when conservative groups agree that the messages are there and applaud the movie for having them.
Just look at the YouTube comments on this, everybody cheering him beating up hippies. Look at the shiny gun and the intimidating look of the Panthers when he's leaving. Even "Black Panther party" was a laugh-line -- haha, what an oxymoron right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMzk89bYjiQ
Here's some great commentary for you, while you type another shitty post about how none of this is happening:
^ All from the first page, I didn't even hit the "Load More" button.
You don't want this subtext to be there? Tough shit.
Pulp Fiction should have.
Pretty much this. I'll defer to Ebert's review (obviously liberal) on this.
"And yet this is not a heartwarming story about a mentally retarded man. That cubbyhole is much too small and limiting for Forrest Gump. The movie is more of a meditation on our times, as seen through the eyes of a man who lacks cynicism and takes things for exactly what they are. Watch him carefully and you will understand why some people are criticized for being "too clever by half." Forrest is clever by just exactly enough."
"As Forrest's life becomes a guided tour of straight-arrow America, Jenny (played by Robin Wright) goes on a parallel tour of the counterculture. She goes to California, of course, and drops out, tunes in, and turns on. She's into psychedelics and flower power, antiwar rallies and love-ins, drugs and needles. Eventually it becomes clear that between them Forrest and Jenny have covered all of the landmarks of our recent cultural history, and the accommodation they arrive at in the end is like a dream of reconciliation for our society. What a magical movie."
That's really all the movie is.