• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Patreon updates Terms of Service to clamp down on adult content

Kthulhu

Member
lol those are the guys doing gross porn rape stuff with DOA characters, right?

Yeah they're fucked.

It's understandable that Patreon wants to get themselves out of that, so many people creating quesitonable content use it and it gives a bad image. At the end you use their service so you have to accomodate to them, or find other ways to get the money.

But who is avoiding Patreon due to people who make porn? They don't have advertisers, they aren't publicly traded, and they basically have a monopoly on this kind of service.
 

Tworak

Member
toodles twitch IRL streamers. however will I now get some semi-lewd photos of a girl that read out what I wrote once.
 
They even list out fictional stories as an exemption, though it doesn't seem to make any sense in context with the rest of the guidelines.
This part
For example, survivor stories or fiction such as Game of Thrones or Lolita are allowed on Patreon.
seems to be more about how you can still write about stuff that's already R rated.
 

Vlaphor

Member
As someone who donates to a few artists who would be affected by this, they've made it clear that they'll find new homes for some of their more intense stuff and still find ways to reward their patreons.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
We have zero tolerance when it comes to the glorification of sexual violence which includes bestiality, rape, and child exploitation (i.e., sexualized depiction of minors). This is true for illustrated, animated, or any other type of content. Patreon reserves the right to review and remove accounts that may violate this guideline. As a strong commitment to child safety, we will work with law enforcement whenever we come across child exploitation.
Nice that they're taking a stand on this tbch.
 

Kthulhu

Member
"they aren't publicly traded"

It is likely a step towards doing just that.

And American capitalism continues to destroy people's art and livelyhood for the sake of greed.

Fuck our shitty puritanical culture.

Edit: it's also a pretty stupid reason considering Tumblr is thriving and it allows porn.
 

Ferr986

Member
I mean, obviously it's a service that doesn't need any of their user's consent to change their terms of service, but anyone using something like this to fund their endeavors is likely to be relying on it as a steady source of income, and having that income removed can be a serious blow to anyone's living situation.

I feel like Patreon has a moral imperative to ensure the stability of their service above and beyond most others purely for this reason. Changing their terms of service to such a degree is... pretty difficult to swallow.

I just don't like it one bit.

I understand it sucks for them but if I'm not mistaken there's others platforms to do it, and probably new ones will appear.
I'm just saying that at the end they are in their right to do this move if they feel it damages their image, or whatever reason they may have.

But who is avoiding Patreon due to people who make porn? They don't have advertisers, they aren't publicly traded, and they basically have a monopoly on this kind of service.

The hell do I know, but if they do this is not because they like to lose money, I would guess.
 

_Ryo_

Member
There are already alternatives to Patreon for that kind of content. This update will make that alternative more attractive now.

I think the problem with a lot of the alternatives is that a lot of banks have negative actions towards Adult Entertainment creators and Patreon allowed such artists to be paid more directly via paypal. Paypal on its own blocks transactions of Adult Entertainment Creators.

You can read more about that subject here: https://www.engadget.com/2015/12/02/paypal-square-and-big-bankings-war-on-the-sex-industry/
 

Fuchsdh

Member
"they aren't publicly traded"

It is likely a step towards doing just that.

That was my thought as well.

If they were actually interested in totally killing their revenue, they would do something like actually enforce copyright law against the huge numbers of people who are mostly making their money of selling fan art of copyrighted characters.
 

Extollere

Sucks at poetry
It was Patreon that supported and made a big deal out of allowing adult content in the first place

Now i'm confused. Are things like drawn pictures under threat or not?

No, not unless they depict any of the restricted content. At least that's my understanding. Until this point, Patreon has been highly supportive of adult content creators, they even managed to negotiate with PayPal to allow users to support creators using their services - something PayPal doesn't usually support.

I don't think Patreon is actively trying to edge out creators here, as much as they are trying to keep things neat and tidy. As far as I've known they've never really allowed or endorsed real pornography through the site. Them clamping down on certain fictional content (such as depictions of rape), is probably just a part of their mission to avoid trouble and controversy... still though this is where things get tricky. Have you ever seen hentai pictures before? Who is to say that that drawing of rough sex with a submissive looking figure is a consensual situation or not? What if one person views it a certain way, and somebody else another? I guess it'll be up to creators to very clearly state their intent before and after posting such things.
 

sirap

Member
Looks like they're serious, hammer seems to have hit a lot of adult content-creators.

My heart goes out to the artists affected by this. Erotic authors got hit with the same thing 2 years ago, so I can relate.

God knows how hard it is to make a decent living in this industry.
 
This sounded quite reasonable and fine until the "no sale of adult content" part. I can definitely understand it having to be behind a paywall and not the public page, but they're just coming off as UK government-level prudes with that.
 
I wonder how this would affect David Bull's attempt to create a modern print of Hokusai's The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife (nsfw to google that)

He definitely has a patreon, but now it seems that these rules would block him giving that as a reward for any tier of subscription.
 

NimbusD

Member
I feel like their biggest earner right now is "adult content" though

to be fair their terms seem pretty wishy washy. Just saying it gives them the right to determine on 'iffy' stuff. So essentially: things that get complain about enough to cause a ruckus=gone. Everything else I imagine is fine as long as they're making money and things are quiet.
 

_Ryo_

Member
It's worded in a way that implies they're cracking down prostitution/porn movies. There's already cam sites/clips4sale so it's not really gonna affect those people

It'll affect creators who want a dialogue/communication/interactivity with their consumers/patrons.

Clips4Sale/Manyvids are as far as I know For-Sale only websites, meaning customers have no say in which type of content is created. I may be entirely wrong about that though.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
But this is the internet, everything, no matter what, turns somebody on out there. You could have a patreon about antique washing machines and somebody is treating that as their personal porn and storing it in their spank bank.
 
I think the problem with a lot of the alternatives is that a lot of banks have negative actions towards Adult Entertainment creators and Patreon allowed such artists to be paid more directly via paypal. Paypal on its own blocks transactions of Adult Entertainment Creators.

You can read more about that subject here: https://www.engadget.com/2015/12/02/paypal-square-and-big-bankings-war-on-the-sex-industry/

I was talking about the Japanese version of Patreon, many artists who released their work for free on Pixiv and sold doujin at events like Comiket moved to this service where you pay a monthly amount to support them, while westerners who did the same relied on Patreon.

Don't ask me for links though, I'm at the university at the moment :p
 

Sophist

Member
That was my thought as well.

If they were actually interested in totally killing their revenue, they would do something like actually enforce copyright law against the huge numbers of people who are mostly making their money of selling fan art of copyrighted characters.

porn studios have parodied copyrighted characters for years without problem.
 

collige

Banned
That was my thought as well.

If they were actually interested in totally killing their revenue, they would do something like actually enforce copyright law against the huge numbers of people who are mostly making their money of selling fan art of copyrighted characters.

The other possibility is that their payment processors are bitching. Either way, this sucks.
 
I'm betting this has to do with either app stores or payment processors getting antsy. Or maybe Patreon wants to run ads on unpaid content, idk.

Oh no the poor cosplay "models"

Why are people in this thread acting like folks making money off modeling for content on Patreon isn't a valid line of work 🤔🤔🤔
 

jono51

Banned
I thought the point was to pay to receive nudie pics? Why else would people be handing out money to strangers on the internet, lol..
 

_Ryo_

Member
I was talking about the Japanese version of Patreon, many artists who released their work for free on Pixiv and sold doujin at events like Comiket moved to this service where you pay a monthly amount to support them, while westerners who did the same relied on Patreon.

Don't ask me for links though, I'm at the university at the moment :p

Do they have a Western version of that site? If not wouldn't all Adult Content from outside of Japan still have to follow Japanese law/restrictions re:censorship?
 

Laiza

Member
I think the problem with a lot of the alternatives is that a lot of banks have negative actions towards Adult Entertainment creators and Patreon allowed such artists to be paid more directly via paypal. Paypal on its own blocks transactions of Adult Entertainment Creators.

You can read more about that subject here: https://www.engadget.com/2015/12/02/paypal-square-and-big-bankings-war-on-the-sex-industry/
Wow, damn. I did not know about this.

I'm actually having difficulty processing this. Why would they do this? Why go to these lengths to prevent people from making money with anything related to sex? I just can't understand the reasoning...
 
Don't be into freaky shit and you'll be fine.

image.php
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
I thought the point was to pay to receive nudie pics? Why else would people be handing out money to strangers on the internet, lol..
There are a lot of artists, podcasts, gaming sites, etc. who make money on patreon.

Maybe not the majority. But a pretty big chunk of it. Notice how many of those tabs on that site are labeled adult. They might not dominate the top 50 list, but there's A LOT of adult stuff on patreon
It's not a blanket ban on adult content tho, just specific adult content while also giving stricter guidelines on allowed adult content.
 

Akronis

Member
Wow, damn. I did not know about this.

I'm actually having difficulty processing this. Why would they do this? Why go to these lengths to prevent people from making money with anything related to sex? I just can't understand the reasoning...

Advertisers perhaps? Easy to spin a negative outlook on a company by saying they process payments for some random weird porn website.
 

Chmpocalypse

Blizzard
Porntreon when?

Basically. Patreon will end up economically regretting this decision when another site swoops in and cleans up.

Like, it's absofuckinglutely ridiculous that Patreon members can no longer sell commissioned porn drawings. Tagging, obfuscation, etc, fine. But this is too far and a really, really dumb decision.

(For the record, I don't even visit Patreon, but this is still bullshit.)
 

rrs

Member
I know of quite a few artists that have higher tiers for getting sketches, art, etc and these rules sound like this is banned now. What a disappointment, who is this even supposed to serve considering they are completely ad-free

Should ban it altogether.
prude
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
That list is sorted on number of patrons, not revenue. Before making her numbers private, Sakimichan, listed 18th in this list, was pulling in ~$46,000 per month, which is more than at least 8 of the Patreons listed above hers due to patron count.
That's pretty insane christ...

Those aren't necessarily the top earners those are the ones with the most patreons. While those numbers are connected you can also see some big fluctuations despite almost the same amount of patreons
Earning correlates with the prices the individual sets for tiers hence that fluctuation, still, not a very big indication that they'd being taking a major loss.
 
Top Bottom