seems like you only played from 3 to 4 really so there is more moot then x
pretty bold to claim what looks like monster hunter then but
¯\_(ツ
_/¯
Sorry I forgot that I'm not entitled to an opinion of what the series should be and what I expect from a sequel because I've haven't played every game -shrug-
If you were a true Scotsman and had been playing since the PS2, you might be a bit sick of the same formula like the rest of us. No more 5 second chugging and foraging means the game can focus on new and interesting stuff in battle. Palicoes and healing hammer horns have changed the meta on healing pauses for years anyway.
Yep, I can understand that. There are people on this board who have probably put thousands of hours into these games and want something new. I would prefer a HD sequel with new content with the same core feel I've loved.
I've never felt that healing horns or palicoes really made a ton of difference, but then again I would never use the term 'meta' in MH. I'm not that hardcore about it.
Even if I believe you and take this at face value.
The following
means you're either blind or being negative for the sake of negativity.
I was up on this game during the initial reveal when everyone was complaining. I didn't think they'd change some core aspects and that stealth/butterflies/environmental/whatever would just be additional on top, but I was wrong. So no, I'm not being negative for the sake of being negative, I'm just calling what I see.
If I'm blind then point what I'm wrong about to me instead of challenging my "MH cred" and gawking about how someone could dislike what they've seen.