No, they dont sell games digitally on any other service than Steam.
BTW Dead Space 3 is on gmg, but Portal 2 isnt or any other Valve game in fact.
Portal 2 is on Gamefly ...
http://www.gamefly.com/Download-Portal-2/5003626/
No, they dont sell games digitally on any other service than Steam.
BTW Dead Space 3 is on gmg, but Portal 2 isnt or any other Valve game in fact.
Portal 2 is on Gamefly ...
http://www.gamefly.com/Download-Portal-2/5003626/
No, they dont sell games digitally on any other service than Steam.
BTW Dead Space 3 is on gmg, but Portal 2 isnt or any other Valve's game in fact.
I just dont get the hate, he just saying that they arent doing anything extra, not that port will be awful.
Do you play games, or do you play tech specs? Your decision to play Dead Space 3 shouldn't be based on whether Dead Space 3 has rendering features and textures on par with some other random PC game. Your decision should be based on whether you want to play Dead Space 3. If you do, do you want to play the best version? The PC version is still objectively the best one.
They are offering the same content as they are on consoles, at the same price, with better resolution and frame rate. If you are actually interested in DS3 as a game and not as a technical showpiece, then what's the problem?
Then why did they only release Dead Space Extraction on Wii? They should have released all the main games there, and make the other consoles' versions (and the PC port) look and play just like that one. That way everyone would have had the same experience.But based on what Visceral and Papoutsis are saying, adding the extra bells and whistle into the PC version means that us dirty little console folk wont get to experience the game the way it was meant to be seen. Personally I'm inclined to believe Papoutsis, he seems like a straight shooter. Him and Visceral feel that making a bare bones port means that no one we'll have "a better version" meaning that everyone will get to see the game the way it was meant to be seen, and I see nothing wrong with this.
They didn't do anything extra in the first game either, and that port was in fact really awful. And their reason for not making any effort on the PC version is fucking ludicrous.
Portal 2 is on Gamefly ...
http://www.gamefly.com/Download-Portal-2/5003626/
No, they dont sell games digitally on any other service than Steam.
BTW Dead Space 3 is on gmg, but Portal 2 isnt or any other Valve game in fact.
So Dead Space 2 wasnt released in meantime? Gotcha...
Nice way to skip facts, btw,
Gamefly has just about all of their titles for digital download as do Gamestop. Not seeing many other places though.Yes, this one i see, but havent they made partnership with Gamestop like few months ago.
They didn't do anything extra in the first game either, and that port was in fact really awful. And their reason for not making any effort on the PC version is fucking ludicrous.
Because by supporting it I am sending them the message that it is okay for them not to live up to the platforms standards. I want to play the game, so I will, when it's deeply discounted. When they want all my monies, they can put forth some effort.
I play games that I feel are appropriate for the platform I game on, at the price I think they are worth. That's why for a lot of time I refused to buy games that contained SecuROM, until last year I finally caved in and got a couple of them (BioShock 1&2 and Batman: Arkham Asylum GOTY) when they were cheap enough that the benefits outweighted the cons.Do you play games, or do you play tech specs? Your decision to play Dead Space 3 shouldn't be based on whether Dead Space 3 has rendering features and textures on par with some other random PC game. Your decision should be based on whether you want to play Dead Space 3. If you do, do you want to play the best version? The PC version is still objectively the best one.
They are offering the same content as they are on consoles, at the same price, with better resolution and frame rate. If you are actually interested in DS3 as a game and not as a technical showpiece, then what's the problem?
I'm not sure how you could describe the first game's port as "really awful." It ran great at 1200p60, controlled fine if you turned off VSync or used a controller, and looked way better than the console versions. Extra features would have been gravy, yes, but the experience of playing though it certainly wasn't a bad one.
Gamefly has just about all of their titles for digital download as do Gamestop. Not seeing many other places though.
He's confused why PC gamers expect standard features relative to their platform?
Keeping it bare bones allows for the PC version to be more accessible to people with lower end computers while at the same time providing a visual experience that is equally matched no matter what kind of hardware its running on. Judging by the system requirements for DS3, any computer built within the last five/six years should be able to max the game out just fine and dandy.
The point that obviously went over your head was that there is demonstrable proof that when they don't give a fuck about the PC version, we get absolutely terrible PC ports.
Not really, i'm surprised that You can buy Valve games in other places now, because some time ago i've checked and couldnt find any other sources than Steam.It still won't work without Steam. (Which is what I think he meant.)
What standard features do Dead Space 1 and 2 not have? Maybe I should install the former again just to check but I remember there being basic graphics options. Let's put this into perspective here -- this is nowhere near the vanilla Dark Souls PC port. Outside of the vsync issue I thought DS1 attained the bare minimum of what PC audiences expect. Of course there's also Visceral not releasing the "Severed" DLC for DS2 on PC.
Furthermore, we souldn't expect every PC port to look like Crysis 2 and Battlefield 3. It'd be great if they did put more effort or at least put in lossless assets like Max Payne 3 and Call of Duty do. I might be mad if this game was running on the Frostbite engine though.
Crytek sounded really similar two years ago, actually. After the backlash of Crysis 2, though, they've gone back to a more PC-centric PR campaign with Crysis 3.I am glad Crytek and CD Projekt exist.
so...does that mean I need to read that downsampling thread for some AA?
Which is why saying nothing at all would have been better.The backlash over the PC version of Dead Space 3 being a better PC port than most other console ports is absolutely mind boggling.
The backlash over the PC version of Dead Space 3 being a better PC port than most other console ports is absolutely mind boggling.
Barebones doesn't mean bad, though. A port can be barebones and still be a "great" port.Most console ports aren't completely barebones anymore.
It adds the directories "Electrontic Arts" and "Electronic Arts" to your My Documents folder.Goddammit. I just bought DS1. Is the PC port that bad?
In what world they would make a worse port than they last entry that You compared to DS 1? Can You explain it to me?
Ill bring my laughs in the comming months when Dead Space 3, Army of Two and Fuse fail miserably at the charts.
There's another option in that last screenshot that is shadow quality.
Now defend it being Origin only EA.
Why would they need to defend that anymore than Valve has to defend their Steam only games?