I took a deep breath when I saw the GameStop link come through my Twitter feed. RESIST.
Patrick Klepek said:It's on Nintendo to figure this out. The rest of us should stop playing along, and Nintendo should forfeit the right to complain about why people use emulators
I don't understand how selling fewer products makes Nintendo more money than selling more products, assuming the price of the product remains unchanged.
I only wanted to resell so I could spend the money on something worthwhile.
Selling more of the SNES will net them a one time sale. They can under produce, get tons of free publicity from people who can't find them, them being listed all over Ebay & Craigslist / FB Market place, etc.
Then they can use that publicity this holiday season to bolster the Nintendo Switch, where the opportunity to generate more revenue over time is considerably higher. Especially if they can get news of their subscription based virtual console out before that point in time (getting people to buy a switch on the promise of streamable classic games via a "Netflix" like service).
This is intentional.
They had a shitton of Wii Us and Animal Crossing Amiibos. This doesn't always happen and people who think it's somehow deliberate consistently miss the mark.
Hard to understand that from a guy who will probably get one for free from Nintendo. Hypocrisy much?
They had a shitton of Wii Us and Animal Crossing Amiibos. This doesn't always happen and people who think it's somehow deliberate consistently miss the mark.
Why not open preorders in April or so and manufacture to meet demand?
I have a SNES preorder secured, and I was able to get a NES classic, but I think this situation is shitty and horrible. I'm frustrated for everyone.Sounds like he wasn't able to get a pre-order.
But what if playing Star Fox 2 is worth this to me?
+1
This "totally not limited edition" console Classic shit is aggravating. They're not making enough to meet demand, they won't commit to manufacturing any beyond 2017.
What the fuck is the point of these things? Are they just a cheap way to insure that Nintendo has one of the "hot gadgets" this holiday season. God dammit you launched a new console this year that you can't even meet demand on. This is all negative mindshare. 2017 will be the year Nintendo released two different products that failed to meet half of their demand.
Just seems so damn stupid. Add all that to the fact that you can buy like 90% of these games on every console Nintendo has released in the past ~decade, except the one released this year, for extra befuddlement.
This is a systemic problem with Nintendo, and it literally only happens with Nintendo. Again and again, they undership fucking everything. Like they're the only company that doesn't want my money.
As if someone like Klepek couldn't just ask Nintendo/Reggie for one.
Has Nintendo really changed the way it interacts with media?
Selling more of the SNES will net them a one time sale. They can under produce, get tons of free publicity from people who can't find them, them being listed all over Ebay & Craigslist / FB Market place, etc.
Then they can use that publicity this holiday season to bolster the Nintendo Switch, where the opportunity to generate more revenue over time is considerably higher. Especially if they can get news of their subscription based virtual console out before that point in time (getting people to buy a switch on the promise of streamable classic games via a "Netflix" like service).
This is intentional.
I definitely understand the anger, but what exactly is he proposing people do about it? Not buy a sold out novelty system?
Have you ever read ANY interview with Reggie?
He'd get better responses asking a wall.
Selling more of the SNES will net them a one time sale. They can under produce, get tons of free publicity from people who can't find them, them being listed all over Ebay & Craigslist / FB Market place, etc.
Then they can use that publicity this holiday season to bolster the Nintendo Switch, where the opportunity to generate more revenue over time is considerably higher. Especially if they can get news of their subscription based virtual console out before that point in time (getting people to buy a switch on the promise of streamable classic games via a "Netflix" like service).
This is intentional.
Oh come on. Not this nonsense again.
I think he wants us to just not pay for older Nintendo games to really stick it to Nintendo.
Selling more of the SNES will net them a one time sale. They can under produce, get tons of free publicity from people who can't find them, them being listed all over Ebay & Craigslist / FB Market place, etc.
Then they can use that publicity this holiday season to bolster the Nintendo Switch, where the opportunity to generate more revenue over time is considerably higher. Especially if they can get news of their subscription based virtual console out before that point in time (getting people to buy a switch on the promise of streamable classic games via a "Netflix" like service).
This is intentional.
Doesn't this idea only work if they have surplus Switches that they're trying to get rid of
Selling more of the SNES will net them a one time sale. They can under produce, get tons of free publicity from people who can't find them, them being listed all over Ebay & Craigslist / FB Market place, etc.
Then they can use that publicity this holiday season to bolster the Nintendo Switch, where the opportunity to generate more revenue over time is considerably higher. Especially if they can get news of their subscription based virtual console out before that point in time (getting people to buy a switch on the promise of streamable classic games via a "Netflix" like service).
This is intentional.
They never have excess inventory. They order a small amount of hardware and sell it all at a profit, while generating tons of buzz due to how rare the thing is. It's basically an elaborate marketing campaign at the expense of the fans.
Doesn't this idea only work if they have surplus Switches that they're trying to get rid of
You don't think Nintendo is preparing a lot of units for the Holiday season? Selling them now is great, but selling them Nov-Dec is significantly better because historically attach rates are much higher, and a console leaving then will probably have a game or two and an extra controller attached.
Switch owners can't even do that ;_;
This may be a stupid question. But, given the demand, would it have been in Nintendo's interest to take pre-orders earlier and produced units based on that number? Instead of the other way around? Is that a thing in this world?
The Dragon Boxes were limited items in the truest sense of the word. An order start date would be announced several months in advance, as well as an order deadline. The ordering windows were typically several months in length, and all manufacturing of the box sets were based solely on the number of orders received. In other words, they only made enough boxes to satisfy the orders made within the given timelines, after which point production on the boxes ended indefinitely. With so few actual Dragon Boxes in circulation (most of which already in the loving arms of Dragon Ball fans), it makes finding these boxes nowadays somewhat difficult.
I don't understand how selling fewer products makes Nintendo more money than selling more products, assuming the price of the product remains unchanged.
dont reward waypoint for this clickbait bullshit
blame retailers for holding preorders at random times or holding back stock for overpriced bundles
It is strange that a company seemly wants you to jump through hoops to give THEM money.
Nintendo could meet demand if they gauged it remotely accurately and manufactured accordingly.
I think there's a sensible middle ground somewhere between "infinite amounts" and "deliberate scarcity". Nintendo don't get any money from the resale market, so I don't understand why they'd make so few of these things. They could easily double or triple the number and would still sell out. They obviously don't hate money, so there's only one plausible, yet irrational answer: rarity purely for rarity's sake.It seems odd to blame the manufacturer in all of this... it's not like Nintendo can create infinite amounts of these consoles.
Who is even handling the pre-orders? Is it Nintendo giving retailers their initial allocations and then the retailers allocating so many of them (or all of them) to pre-orders?
No-one even knows how many consoles Nintendo is producing, or what their production limits are like. As far as we know Nintendo had their internal estimates and ratcheted them way up and are still behind. But this is an entirely new SKU with it's own production demands, you just don't go from 0-100 or re-allocate other resources magically.
I know the general attitude between this and the NES Classic is 'lol Nintendo' but some critical thinking would get you to the thoughts that if Nintendo had the means to sell you a console they would, and they aren't doing this out of spite.
I walked to gamestop 10 mins after they tweeted about in store preorders, got one no issues lol sorry I dont see the issue
Its a limited item, Nintendo said its a limited item, cant help there are bots and scalpers out there
This situation happens because past history has indicated that there may not be anything at day 20 or day 100.