You can't say this with certainty. Who knows how it would have sold.
Outselling Origins before it was discounted to basically free was certainly a reasonable expectation
You can't say this with certainty. Who knows how it would have sold.
You can't say this with certainty. Who knows how it would have sold.
Apparently they felt otherwise.
Apparently they felt otherwise.
If we want to help the dev team we need to find a way to pressure the head of Ubisoft to make things right here.
this is ugly
How many are delayed 3 weeks from release?
And aparently some workers disagree with this, so "they" is not as clear cut as you want it to be.
I loved Origins so much that I was going to buy a Wii U for this game. To say I am disappointed it got pushed to September is understating it.
In spite of that, I really don't understand the boycott talk. You want to play this game. It is delayed. So given to option of playing it later or never playing it, you are going to pick the second option?!
Once again, Ubisoft felt it was in their best interest to port it to other platforms.
You're assuming that the little they'll make from the other ports will offsert 7 more months of development, advertising for multiple systems and the cost of porting
Do you know what delusional means?
There's no possible way you actually think that word was the best choice for that sentence. It just doesn't make any sense.
Did we ever get solid sales figures for Origins on a console-by-console basis?
I am rather interested to see the split.
The problem is there's only so much money to go around. By September there will be a lot of games out for all systems. That's generally a time when a bunch of games are released. It's February and there's jack shit coming out on the Wii U. The perfect time to release it. They're all alone, gamers are starved for games and have extra cash to pick it up. By September, this won't be the case. So unless there's actually nothing to buy in September (which isn't the case since GTA V is coming out that month), I'll have to wait to pick it up. Based on how I buy games, Rayman will end up either not being purchased at all or on the back burner to be picked up at some later time. Probably when it collapses in price. And what good would that do them?
I feel bad for the devs but IMO, I think it will do better on the platforms rather than staying exclusive on Wii U.
Wii U feels like the Wii without the party/casual games when it comes to 3rd party support IMO. I'm guessing people either don't know what the Wii U is, their impression that it's just an expansion of the Wii, or the Wii U as a less-than-efficient alternative to PS3/360, which people will rather purchase because of the current library.
They probably have to remake or remove the Murphy levels so the games compatible. I'm sure it's more than just a simple port job.I think it will if it's a skeleton porting crew, which I think is viable - let's be honest, most of the tech is stil intact - but it won't if they have to retain a significant porting crew.
But then, seven months is kinda weird. I've worked on development projects that have run - from start to finish - in less time. It's a bit of a long time, frankly, for a skeleton port crew, particularly when you'd have to imagine that much of the infrastructure is already in place. I ported PS2 titles to the Xbox *without* an existing base to work from (other than our inhouse engine), and it took a couple of months - and it would have been less if I wasn't the only dev on the project in question.
There's something here not adding up.
This petition has gained a decent amount of signatures pretty fast! It's not much, but hey - it's something!
http://www.change.org/petitions/ubi...yman-legends-release-date-for-the-wii-u#share
Do you have a point? I used the word correctly in that context.
But by all means, continue at add nothing to the conversation.
They probably have to remake or remove the Murphy levels so the games compatible. I'm sure it's more than just a simple port job.
This petition has gained a decent amount of signatures pretty fast! It's not much, but hey - it's something!
http://www.change.org/petitions/ubi...yman-legends-release-date-for-the-wii-u#share
Considering that there will be other Wii U titles I'm going to want and play at the time this comes out I'm going to have to pass until Black Friday when it hits the bargain bins.
I feel bad for the devs but tough shit.
Come to think of it, I wonder how necessary a delay that long is? Do they have to wait that long to get it ported + go through QA on that engine? Maybe I'm just being naive but I think this would be easier to deal with if they went "Hey this is a May release now" as we're still in a slow period for Wii U and even slower for other consoles.
... Oh shit, what if it's because they saw games like Bioshock Infinite coming out and decided to just delay the whole thing rather than merely make later ports? Then again looking at the dates that got delayed by a month, so it'd be Dead Space 3 and MGR. Unless EOIV's just that intimidating.
be tough to find out. Its launch month it only sold like 50k copies in the US across 3 platforms
You're delusional if you think this game would have sold any better in February.
Thanks for sharing, signed!This petition has gained a decent amount of signatures pretty fast! It's not much, but hey - it's something!
http://www.change.org/petitions/ubi...yman-legends-release-date-for-the-wii-u#share
Unless they decided it would be in their best interest to include some exclusive levels in the ps3/360 versions that the Wii U version won't get. Who knows at this point. I'm sure we'll eventually get some conclusive information soon.I *think* I saw something that implied that Murfy was still a Wii U exclusive, which if it's the case there's not really much difficulty in just axing them.
it's cool more people will get a shot at this game, but ubisoft management sucks. they should have made this multiplatform from day one.
Do have to wonder (however baseless it may be) whether any of this was influenced by the incoming Sony/PS4 reveal. Can imagine a Wii U game releasing in that time frame might be completely steamrolled in news/exposure.
Just imagine how big the Wii U userbase will be by September!
already signed that but I was thinking media pressure
too bad Rich IGN took it upon himself to blame Nintendo instead of seeing greed for what it is.
This game absolutely would have sold on Wii U better in Feb then in Sept. Now, would it have sold better on Wii U in Feb vs Multi-plat, who knows but probably not. That said, it would have been best for them to release the Wii U version now, since it's ready, and then release it for PS360 users in Sept.
Bottom line is the way Ubisoft has handled this is down right scummy. Even the Dev are upset over the way it's been handled.
I don't understand people wanting to boycott the game. It's still going to be a great game. What if the 360 version and ps3 version get online co-op?
Honestly anyone who says they're boycotting this either was never going to buy it, or will have changed their minds by September.
Basically this. I'd like to support the devs and buy the game for the system it was intended...but the suits in the business really piss me off. I want this game, was looking forward to it, it's an absolute visual stunner...now I'm divided...
We call that Games Journalism. Maybe he'll have a piece next week blaming the consumers as well.
I don't understand people wanting to boycott the game. It's still going to be a great game. What if the 360 version and ps3 version get online co-op?
Honestly anyone who says they're boycotting this either was never going to buy it, or will have changed their minds by September.
Agreed. I've cancelled my preorder, and I'm done with Ubi for the foreseeable future.