• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Amazon looking to build a second HQ in North America, will add 50k jobs

LaNaranja

Member
It's going to be Irvine, CA.

Remember this post when they announce it in 2018.

Yup. I know no one on gaf pays attention to local politics but the people that do have been loud and clear that they want Amazon in the OC area and the Board of Supervisors are all in support. I don't think I have seen a single person speak out against it at any meetings (mostly because everyone is too busy trying to get something done about the homeless crisis).
 

Africanus

Member
Some of these wild choices here...

Y’all need to have a developed metro transit system, which blows out most of the south.
Then there’s the need to be economically on the rise, which takes out the rust belt and arguably Chicago.
They want a different culture from the PNW which probably eliminates any West Coast venues (not sure how much Denver is counted as the West.
 
Yup. I know no one on gaf pays attention to local politics but the people that do have been loud and clear that they want Amazon in the OC area and the Board of Supervisors are all in support. I don't think I have seen a single person speak out against it at any meetings (mostly because everyone is too busy trying to get something done about the homeless crisis).

You just described the local politics of almost every major city. This is not a differentiator for that location.

Moody's Analytics puts Austin, Atlanta, and Philly in the top three best locations.
 

Pedrito

Member
No outside large company will every make a large investment in Quebec. The separatists made sure of that.

The issue is more the french language than the small threat of separation.

Ubisoft made huge investments and it paid off tremendously for them. Then again, they're a French company so the language thing wasn't much of an issue.

Anyway, no chance Amazon comes here, or to Canada.
 
Please don't let them pick Austin...we don't even match any of their proposed requirements beyond being a young and hip place. Traffic and roads are horrible and the airport would be so far from the site! Yet they see us as a finalist!
 

Zoe

Member
Please don't let them pick Austin...we don't even match any of their proposed requirements beyond being a young and hip place. Traffic and roads are horrible and the airport would be so far from the site! Yet they see us as a finalist!

Plenty of undeveloped land along the toll roads.

The only problem for Austin is mass transit.
 

Kimawolf

Member
Come on Amazon! Come to KC!

We have Cerner already, and our tech infrastructure is rising fast plus we been updating our mass transit AND building a new state of the art airport (although the old one is super convenient...).

And hey land is cheap here! You can buy a house that'd cost ya 5 million on the west coast for only 500k here! (not really, but housing market is super cheap!)
 

DopeyFish

Not bitter, just unsweetened
Well, Google just announced they are developing a neighborhood just east of downtown Toronto... as well as their Canadian HQ.

http://toronto.ctvnews.ca/toronto-w...bourhood-google-canada-headquarters-1.3636573

So it's one reason I say there's a chance Amazon does the same. Even a choice quote from article:

"You guys are the home for immigrants -- excellent," Schmidt said. "Try to remember that technology is powered by immigrants. I need to tell some people in America, so please continue."

Schmidt said he met with Trudeau shortly after the 2015 federal election. He said Trudeau came to him and said Canada wanted to be the next Silicon Valley, the world's leading technology hub in California.

"I hear this a lot from politicians, but somehow I believed him," Schmidt said.
 
Yup. I know no one on gaf pays attention to local politics but the people that do have been loud and clear that they want Amazon in the OC area and the Board of Supervisors are all in support. I don't think I have seen a single person speak out against it at any meetings (mostly because everyone is too busy trying to get something done about the homeless crisis).

Might as well keep heading east to Riverside its close to LA, OC, SD and Arizona has lots of space and housing is still plentiful, continues to be built and cheaper.
 

Euler007

Member
No outside large company will every make a large investment in Quebec. The separatists made sure of that.

That's really not a problem and the first thing Ontarians will say to an American company to make them overpay by going to Toronto instead. If Canada ever did split up the American company would be number one on the list of things taken care of. Better in Montreal than cut off from the ocean in Toronto.
 
Chula Vista put in a $400 million bid. I'm hoping for anywhere in southern California.
http://fox5sandiego.com/2017/10/17/...-submitting-bid-for-amazons-2nd-headquarters/

That's pennies to Amazon. This line is painful to read, however

"We are open for business and ready to get Amazon here," Casillas Sallas said. "We are offering forgiveness on property taxes."

I wonder if small local businesses get forgiveness on property taxes?

Anyways, I'm hoping anywhere but southern California. Literally anywhere. Bezos you motherfucker, if you're reading this: out of all the cities in North America, if you choose a city in So Cal I will haunt your ass when I die!
 

Ecotic

Member
Moody's has a nice quantitative analysis ranking the choices, but they also write up a qualitative case for each.

93d8fe5a-af77-11e7-a59f-1dba99bbbffa.png

I like the qualitative approach better, as I think many of the critical qualities can't be quantified. It's not the best approach to simply average the categories, because obviously some criteria are more important than others. For a business as reliant upon the quality of its knowledge workers such as Amazon, cost considerations need to be secondary to which city can provide the most talented workforce available. It's also not the best idea to look at the data and simply compare cities based upon the percentage of college-educated workers. Amazon needs the absolute cream of the crop and that's harder to quantify.

I can really only see the Northeastern Corridor cities of Boston and New York being chosen. I think Amazon needs to be located in a true destination city to attract the best of the best, and my recommendation would be New York as it's a giant business cluster and it houses so many Fortune 500 companies and is located near so many Ivy League schools that it would be easy to find the best and poach the best.
 

ahoyhoy

Unconfirmed Member
Moody's has a nice quantitative analysis ranking the choices, but they also write up a qualitative case for each.



I like the qualitative approach better, as I think many of the critical qualities can't be quantified. It's not the best approach to simply average the categories, because obviously some criteria are more important than others. For a business as reliant upon the quality of its knowledge workers such as Amazon, cost considerations need to be secondary to which city can provide the most talented workforce available. It's also not the best idea to look at the data and simply compare cities based upon the percentage of college-educated workers. Amazon needs the absolute cream of the crop and that's harder to quantify.

I can really only see the Northeastern Corridor cities of Boston and New York being chosen. I think Amazon needs to be located a in true destination city to attract the best of the best, and my preference would be New York as it's a giant business cluster and it houses so many Fortune 500 companies and is located near so many Ivy League schools that it would be easy to find the best and poach the best.

Rochester is actually a good choice. Plenty of veteran tech people from Kodak/Xerox, can partner with RIT to train new people, and there's a toooon of recently abandoned industrial space to rehab.

No public transit to speak of but they have a good highway system that's basically half used because of population loss.

Also, the snow. God damn that snow.
 
I can really only see the Northeastern Corridor cities of Boston and New York being chosen. I think Amazon needs to be located in a true destination city to attract the best of the best, and my recommendation would be New York as it's a giant business cluster and it houses so many Fortune 500 companies and is located near so many Ivy League schools that it would be easy to find the best and poach the best.
Philadelphia is on the Northeast corridor as well...

Also if you are talking about recruiting you need engineering schools that have not been sapped out by other tech companies, not just Ivy League schools. You can't just build a workforce built off Ivy League graduates, that would be ridiculous. Philadelphia has universities with engineering schools in its general proximity like UPenn, Drexel, Temple, Rutgers, Villanova, Penn State, UDel, Lehigh, Bucknell, Lafayette, and Carnegie Mellon across the state, just to name a few to sap from. Then of course they could further sap out talent from NJ/NY/ other New England Schools. I am not sure why they would go to New York when they would be competing with so many other giant tech companies out there. In Philadelphia their largest tech competition for talent would be Comcast.
 

emag

Member
Philadelphia *cough* *cough*. I must be getting sick. It is on the Northeast corridor.

Also if you are talking about recruiting you need engineering schools that have not been sapped out by other tech companies, not just Ivy League schools. It has universities with engineering schools like UPenn, Drexel, Rutgers, Villanova, Penn State, Lehigh, Bucknell, Lafayette, UDel, and Carnegie Mellon across the state, just to name a few in its general proximity to sap from.

Agreed. DC, NYC, and Boston are just too pricey (and unwilling to offer substantive kickbacks). Philly makes the most sense in the NE corridor. Baltimore would probably be next-best, but it's a big step down in most ways.

Overall, Atlanta and Philly are the locations that seem best suited for HQ2 to me, but I'm obviously not privy to all the incentive offers being made to Amazon.
 

Steejee

Member
Philly seems like the most likely to me, with Pittsburgh being in the mix as well. Philly gets you the advantages of a NE Corridor city at a lower cost than NYC/Boston/DC.

Worcester just threw in a pretty sizeable bid ($500mil), but I don't see it having a shot of winning. On the one hand, I do think it would be a good fit for the city in many ways (lots of unused old industrial space, rail and highway connections, airport, relatively low cost of living, tech schools in the area, easy access to Boston/NYC), but I have a hard time believing Amazon will go for anything besides a major city.
 

Ecotic

Member
Philadelphia *cough* *cough*. I must be getting sick. It is on the Northeast corridor.

Also if you are talking about recruiting you need engineering schools that have not been sapped out by other tech companies, not just Ivy League schools. You can't just build a workforce built off Ivy League graduates, that would be ridiculous. Philadelphia has universities with engineering schools in its general proximity like UPenn, Drexel, Temple, Rutgers, Villanova, Penn State, UDel, Lehigh, Bucknell, Lafayette, and Carnegie Mellon across the state, just to name a few to sap from. Then of course they could further sap out talent from NJ/NY/ other New England Schools. I am not sure why they would go to New York when they would be competing with so many other giant tech companies out there. In Philadelphia their largest tech competition for talent would be Comcast.

Philadelphia is a good choice, it would be in my top 5. The distance between Philadelphia and New York City is so minimal that I consider the schools you listed as being within the range of an quick recruiting trip of a NYC company (and in fairness, vice versa).

I would consider neighboring my competition as Amazon would be doing in NYC to be a good thing, and not a detriment. Industries that service the tech companies would locate next to them, lowering the costs to use them. The costs to find information and find potential employees would also be lower due to the industry congregation. Tech people would associate with other tech people, exchange information, trade knowledge, and so on. I just made the argument for why business clusters exist in the first place, and generally they do provide more benefits to companies that outweigh the downsides of competition. In addition to NYC being considered more of a destination city, the synergistic business cluster aspect is why I would recommend it over Philadelphia.
 
Putting an Amazon headquarters in Sandy Springs would choke whatever is left out of that city with even more traffic and out of control home and rental prices. I worked in that city for 5 years at a corporate headquarters, and the traffic is no joke. I lived there an additional 3 years once I quit that job, and saw rent skyrocket by $300-$500 for mediocre apartments once it was announced that Mercedes Benz was moving their headquarters to Sandy Springs. Georgia Tech grads are known for moving out of the state for jobs that offer higher paying wages. It's possible that Amazon could get more of them to stay, but speaking as a Tech grad, I got a lot more offers to move elsewhere for better pay and benefits.

It would make more sense to build in a less crowded location that the city could build around, and bring more people to a state that needs them.
 

Ottaro

Member
It's been fascinating to see some of the proposals that my city sent in its package:

Victory Park
VZqQC0T.jpg

South Dallas
EtxSeDt.jpg

98ef7xt.jpg

TGFEVly.jpg


Oak Cliff
mcbL5Ga.jpg

Reunion
npIMyAq.jpg

WCrpUSa.jpg

This one apparently incorporates the future Dallas-Houston high speed rail.

Trinity Groves
jg8EXEq.jpg

GC6tXjx.jpg

Some of these are developments that were already being planned before Amazon's announcement. I'm sure they're salivating at the thought of Amazon filling them.
 
I don't know why cities in Washington like Tacoma are putting in bids. Amazon is not going to build an entire second HQ and then put it 30 miles down the road. That makes zero sense.
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
It's been fascinating to see some of the proposals that my city sent in its package:








Some of these are developments that were already being planned before Amazon's announcement. I'm sure they're salivating at the thought of Amazon filling them.



And that’s just downtown, I would more likely expect them here in Frisco, or in Grapevine/Irving/Las Calinas for proximity to the airport
 

Nipo

Member
Atlanta still has my bet. East coast, plenty of talent and low cost of living. As long as DC doesn't win i'll be happy though. Please Jeff. stay out of DC you already own the Washington Post.
 

ahoyhoy

Unconfirmed Member
If it's DC we'd better get some new Metro lines and maybe a whole new beltway. Holy fuck no way the current infrastructure can handle 50k new people.
 

Dipper145

Member
I like the qualitative approach better, as I think many of the critical qualities can't be quantified. It's not the best approach to simply average the categories, because obviously some criteria are more important than others. .
I agree, but from what I can tell they must have done that. Given certain categories more weighting than others. Although maybe my math is off. But I expect moodys to have done better quantitative analysis than simply adding up the categories and dividing.
 
Rochester is actually a good choice. Plenty of veteran tech people from Kodak/Xerox, can partner with RIT to train new people, and there's a toooon of recently abandoned industrial space to rehab.

No public transit to speak of but they have a good highway system that's basically half used because of population loss.

Also, the snow. God damn that snow.

Also, if Amazon can vacuum pack and ship garbage plates to the entire US, they would make this entire country a better place.
 

numble

Member
I don't know why cities in Washington like Tacoma are putting in bids. Amazon is not going to build an entire second HQ and then put it 30 miles down the road. That makes zero sense.
Apple built its new HQ in Cupertino down the road from the old HQ in Cupertino which will still be fully used. Google is also building a new HQ in Mountain View. It can make sense.
 

StillEdge

Member
That's pennies to Amazon. This line is painful to read, however



I wonder if small local businesses get forgiveness on property taxes?

Anyways, I'm hoping anywhere but southern California. Literally anywhere. Bezos you motherfucker, if you're reading this: out of all the cities in North America, if you choose a city in So Cal I will haunt your ass when I die!
You’ve got to root for the little city like Chula Vista. Southern California has the most Amazon Warehouses with the biggest one being built in Eastvale at 1.1million square feet. They are already all around you.
 

WedgeX

Banned
If it's DC we'd better get some new Metro lines and maybe a whole new beltway. Holy fuck no way the current infrastructure can handle 50k new people.

DC's bid idea are either on top of Union Station, at RFK, or on either side of the Anacostia by the Nationals.

Union Station's is the coolest idea, which will likely happen anyhow, but I doubt any bid actually builds support in Virginia or Maryland to actually invest in the Metro like it needs.
 
DC's bid idea are either on top of Union Station, at RFK, or on either side of the Anacostia by the Nationals.

Union Station's is the coolest idea, which will likely happen anyhow, but I doubt any bid actually builds support in Virginia or Maryland to actually invest in the Metro like it needs.

I thought you were exaggerating when you said on top of the station but it actually is. Wow.
 

Slo

Member
I'm hoping for MSP. Not for just Amazon, but I feel like with that many SEs coming to the area then other companies will follow and come too.
 
Top Bottom