Spyder_Monkey
Banned
If we were grading on an audio visual level, Snyder's cape films would be very highly regarded
The battle with Doomsday looks like it was made by an amateur using Unreal Engine 4.
If we were grading on an audio visual level, Snyder's cape films would be very highly regarded
If we were grading on an audio visual level, Snyder's cape films would be very highly regarded
Nope, Returns is awful. I'm watching it right now.
No imo, Snyder movies look good/cool.
Returns at least to me in the 2 categories I mention are artistic masterpieces.
Those 2 elements are so strong I have probably seen Returns a hundred times in my life and its never gotten old.
BvS had great costumes and 2 cool fights, I have seen it 3 times and likely won't again for years.
89 was definitely more diverse looking and bigger feeling1989 sets > Returns sets
Batman Returns is a really good Burton film but not a great Batman/superhero film. Burton and Elfman were at the top of their game at that point and Burton was given more creative control and the aesthetics to this day are still fantastic. It's a great looking and original movie. Artistically, no Batman movie has yet to come close.
The entire cast were at the top of their game as well. It's one of each major actor's most memorable roles(Devito, Walken, Pfeifer, Keaton).
The story isn't anything special and there's a real lack of Batman in this Batman movie because Burton focused more on the villains, but it's still a pretty good ensemble movie. It handled all the main characters extremely well and you understood who they were and why they were the way they were, which is something BvS completely failed at.
Batman Returns is a really good Burton film but not a great Batman/superhero film. Burton and Elfman were at the top of their game at that point and Burton was given more creative control and the aesthetics to this day are still fantastic. It's a great looking and original movie. Artistically, no Batman movie has yet to come close.
The entire cast were at the top of their game as well. It's one of each major actor's most memorable roles(Devito, Walken, Pfeifer, Keaton).
The story isn't anything special and there's a real lack of Batman in this Batman movie because Burton focused more on the villains, but it's still a pretty good ensemble movie. It handled all the main characters extremely well and you understood who they were and why they were the way they were, which is something BvS completely failed at.
Why was Selina Kyle Catwoman? She fell out of a window and was partially eaten by cats and can now do martial arts and also has 9 lives for some reason?
Yes?Why was Selina Kyle Catwoman? She fell out of a window and was partially eaten by cats and can now do martial arts and also has 9 lives for some reason?
So basically we've reaffirmed that:
Thing that is dumb that I am nostalgic for = Fun and silly
Thing that is dumb that I am not nostalgic for = actually dumb
So basically we've reaffirmed that:
Thing that is dumb that I am nostalgic for = Fun and silly
Thing that is dumb that I am not nostalgic for = actually dumb
1989 sets > Returns sets
I've always seen Batman Returns less as a story and more of a sort of fairy tale nightmare set during Christmas and it just so happens to have a few Batman characters in it.
The story itself doesn't make much of any sense, but the film is all about the atmosphere and mood for me.
all you guys defending BVS, please explain to me what Lex Luther's plan/motivation is? I've watched the movie 3 times and still don't get it
I got this:
If the DCEU was doing Black Panther he would have a vibrinum grill and be on a quest for revenge against the jive turkeys that cut his BET signal.
One thing we can't forget about some of these movies is that without the MCU and their "Assembly line" connectivity, we wouldn't have a Marvel Studios, or a Marvel Studios produced Spider-man, and certainly probably NEVER would have gotten a Black Panther movie at all.
Same with Wonder Woman. Movie probably never would have gotten greenlit as a solo project, for better or for worse (I hope it turns out well), had the MCU not triggered WB/DC's "mee-too" mentality.
Because Marvel did their own thing it allowed them the creative license to all but guarantee blockbuster success for many projects that probably never would have gotten major studio funding and budgets had they stood on their own, nor would have they had enough HYPE to generate enough audience interest pretty much not only guarantee a sequel, but fund the next 2 films made as well.
So while some may want to blame the Marvel machine just for existing, they should also thank them for giving WB/DC the push it needs to finally venture past big budgets and marketing for only Batman with the occasion attempt at Superman when it comes to Big Named characters in their vast and fully available catalog of characters.
Now if only WB/DC had copied Marvel on the most important part of this from the start, and laid out an actual plan of story progression, and maybe involved some people that had read more than a single run of a comic to help bring them bring these characters to the Big Screen, which a head honcho that actually KNOWS all the comics and stories to spear head the operation, they could have beat Marvel at their own game.... actually now that I think about it, they should have started this game long before Marvel ever got around to it..
They will use this map
Why was Selina Kyle Catwoman? She fell out of a window and was partially eaten by cats and can now do martial arts and also has 9 lives for some reason?
She was pathetic, sad, a loser, disrespected, condescended to, and murdered like the nobody she was.
The (attempted? symbolic?) murder was the last straw. Catwoman was a rebirth. She came out of her shell. She was confident, finally able to live, finally able to do what she wanted, finally able to express herself.
Like, did you miss all that? Is it really all just concrete explanations and power levels for you?
Returns = subpar story with multiple elements at the peak of the genre.
Batman Forever = so bad, it is enjoyable
Batman & Robin = on the line of so bad its good and bad-bad.
Catwoman = nothing redeemable at all, literally one of the worst things ever made.
Dark Knight = the best technical movie in the genre.
Batman v Superman = subpar to awful story and just full of "meh", it has nice snippets in there but it doesn't have technical elements of complete dominance.
Different tiers to it.
I keep hearing people say shit along these lines and it makes no sense. Like seriously:
DC should do it the marvel way and do individual movies without rushing, they should have a clear strategy
The next moment:
DC shouldn't have foreshadowed so much, and focus on one movie at a time.
How can they have no strategy and yet constantly foreshadow a deeper story in their films.
Wait, so The Dark Knight, a movie filled with bad editing and several scenes with incredibly stupid camera angles, is the best technical movie in the genre? Guess this whole genre is one big technical mess.
His Ape movies are some of the best blockbusters in recent memory.I'm glad, I had no faith in this directer.
I'm sad, it's going to be Snyder isn't it?
His Ape movies are some of the best blockbusters in recent memory.
Actually im glad he's not locked into cape stuff, especially DCMU poison.
What makes BP a glorified doorman?Could be worst, they could make him a glorified doorman, the Marvel way.
What makes BP a glorified doorman?
Returns was sooo bad
First I hate the fact that they made Penguin and Catwoman a Man-penguin and a real Catwoman in the movie.
But ok, I can see that some people liked this. My biggest problem is the tone of the movie. At some times looks like Burton is trying to make a dark and serious story, with the tragic life of both Oswald and Selina...and at the next minute he's destroying the city with a giant rubber duck and she's licking her clothes like a cat
"Several scenes with stupid camera angles" was an actual criticism of The Dark Knight I just read in here.
It is a reasonably accurate criticism, this scene is pretty infamous for how badly shot it is.
Although the film as a whole is fantastic, this scene and a few others are strangely sloppy. I wonder to what extent Nolan's preference for doing practical special effects are requiring compromises in other areas.
Similarly in TDKR the heist at the stock exchange starts off during lunch, but then it's pitch black in what can't be more than an hour later in the movie.
What does it mean, because I think it means it was shot badly.I don't think you know what badly shot means.
1989 sets > Returns sets
I keep hearing people say shit along these lines and it makes no sense. Like seriously:
DC should do it the marvel way and do individual movies without rushing, they should have a clear strategy
The next moment:
DC shouldn't have foreshadowed so much, and focus on one movie at a time.
How can they have no strategy and yet constantly foreshadow a deeper story in their films.
89 was definitely more diverse looking and bigger feeling
But Gotham with snow and Christmas is such a great visual.
The movie felt like it was shot on the same two sound stages. Very claustrophobic and limited in scope. I'm happy Chris Nolan opened the city up in Begins and The Dark Knight
Heh Begins had a similar problem with the "Narrows", they were so obviously sets. TDK is the one where it feels it's set in an actual city. Because it is.