-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Mortal Kombat refused classification in Australia [Update: Customs Seizing Imports]
- Thread starter EatChildren
- Start date
From The Dust
Banned
zmoney said:
Aussie Classification Board. no logic required
EatChildren
Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
Replicant said:
Its inconsistent, and we dont have an R18+ rating, which is the problem. Our usual rating system goes up to R18+, but for some stupid reason gaming does not include that level, and instead cuts off at MA15+. Any game that would get an R18+ gets RC'd or censored.
Sometimes its avoidable by wording the documents you submit to the board in a way that puts your game in a favourable light. For example, the only reason Left 4 Dead 2 was censored was because Valve, EA, or whoever submitted the document made the zombies out to be sick humans. From the board's perspective, mowing down sick innocent humans is bad. Had they said they were zombies or monsters the game wouldn't have been censored.
Though, do they rate the games like ESRB does (or did?) like watching a footage of the "worst things" in the game?
That could explain why God of War III got a pass. In GoWIII, the violent closeups, nipples and gore are usually separated by hours of running around and bathing Kratos in blood from afar. While in this case, everything gets closeups and it's constant.
Not to mention in GoWIII you're usually fighting corpses with armor, corpses with nipples or giant monsters. In MK you're mostly fighting human-looking characters.
That could explain why God of War III got a pass. In GoWIII, the violent closeups, nipples and gore are usually separated by hours of running around and bathing Kratos in blood from afar. While in this case, everything gets closeups and it's constant.
Not to mention in GoWIII you're usually fighting corpses with armor, corpses with nipples or giant monsters. In MK you're mostly fighting human-looking characters.
EatChildren
Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
fernoca said:
Publishers are required to submit a document detailing the content of their game, and the rating is based off this. Because its a document there's a lot of semantics involved, as per my Left 4 Dead 2 example above.
And I really must emphasize the lack of consistency with the Australian Rating Board. Just because one game is allowed with extreme content does not mean all games of equal or even lesser content will be allowed as well. That is why people are so frustrated with our classification system. Many games that have extreme content are allowed in, while others which are not anywhere near as bad are RC'd.
Conrad Link
Member
Good job Australia, ruining it for NZ too (probably).
We have an 18 rating, but sometimes publishers can't be arsed sending copies just to NZ if they aren't to Aus. >_<
Import ahoy!
We have an 18 rating, but sometimes publishers can't be arsed sending copies just to NZ if they aren't to Aus. >_<
Import ahoy!
From The Dust
Banned
The standard method is showing a video of the worst parts or document. A demo/full game is optionalfernoca said:
fernoca said:
Most games are played through to completion by staffers, however some are rated purely from the publisher's description and video footage.
Some of the RC decisions sound pretty strange to both Aussies and non-Aussies alike, but just keep in mind that a video game can't get a rating in Australia unless it is fit for a 15 year old to buy (because only kids buy games, duh).
A lot of people from Australia actually imported GTA4 from NZ because it was uncensored. I wouldn't worry about Australia's banhammer.Conrad Link said:
This does piss me off, though... this was a day one purchase, but now it'll be a day 4-5 (until my imported UK copy gets here).
Weren't we supposed to be really fucking close to an R18+ anyway?
Poimandres
Member
zmoney said:
A question about Saibot?
Probably "high impact realistic violence" or some such something. They pretty much give free reign with "cartoon" gore (see GOW3, NG2) No biggie, since it can be imported from elsewhere.
BocoDragon
or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
Australia consistently seems to be the worst major market to be a gamer..
timetokill
Banned
STAY OVER THERE
boiled goose
good with gravy
TheVampire said:
The problem is not the board.
The problem is that there is no rating they can give it.
The game should be 18,17+. there just isnt a rating right now. The problem is the government. The government represents the people.
The aussies themselves need to change this
MidnightScott
Banned
Guess yall will have to import the PS3 version.
SolidSnakex
Member
EatChildren
Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
Thank you, SolidSnakex.
Conrad Link
Member
:lol :lol :lolamtentori said:
Like hell they do. We vote in governments based on big issues, but when it comes to little things like this the officials (in this case attorney generals) act under their own violation.
A vast majority of Australians are already either in favour or indifferent to the introduction of an R18+ for games. Most Australians already recognise that the real issue with the lack of an R rating is not that the very occasional "mature" game gets RC but that a majority of games that should be R-rated get away with an MA15+ instead.
Well, will be 20 next year. Even Mario, recently turned 25.MetatronM said:
Which is quite awesome for a franchise that before this game, the overall opinion on GAF every time it was mentioned was: "why do they continue making hem? "do the games sell?" "lol my last MK game MKII".
I'm seeing a lot of unfamiliar names here. Get your ass(es) to AusGAF.
EatChildren
Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
Bizzyb said:
G, PG, M15+, MA15+, and R18+ is the standard rating for film, music, and books (where needed). Gaming has that, minus the R18+.
Our classification system says that no game can be released unless it is suitable for the MA15+ rating. In other words, it must be suitable for 15 year olds.
The inconsistency comes from the huge amount of ultra voilent and adult games in the country which are given an MA15+ rating when they should have probably got R18+, and the games that for some reason are classes as R18+ and instead banned.
Out rating system needs to take on the full scale, right up to R18+.
pilonv1 said:
lol, wow what a joke. So games like No More Heroes, GTAIV or Killzone where there are extreme acts of violence and or vulgar language are considered "O.K." for young teenagers, by the government?
what a joke.
Edit: So basically the government is completely ignoring an entire audience of gamers that want to play mature based videogames? What is the reasoning/logic behind this?? There are a LOT of males in America that are 18yrs old+ that play videogames. Is this not the same in Australia?
Chet Rippo
Member
Not something Mortal Kombat has to worry about though.Serenade said: