Flatline
Banned
I don't get it. What are you trying to say?
That Mattrick knew something about gaming, Elop knows absolutely nothing.
I don't get it. What are you trying to say?
Elop and Lars Green will be focusing on alot of things and won't be solely focused on Xbox day to day. This means someone within the Xbox unit will end up overseeing the day to day stuff most of the time IMO. I just hope that person isn't Phil Spencer......
What's the source of those charts? I know they quote sources for the data, but that group of charts reads like some Nokia fan who hates Microsoft using data and a lot of confirmation bias to make it look like Nokia was doing fine and dandy before MS got involved. It's so off base from what most in the industry knows about the state of the company.
Nokia had almost completely disappeared from the US marketplace, Symbian inadequate to keep with other OSs, and the company was spiraling, held up only by it's low end market. Most of that data represent in that chart is explained by the fact that Nokia transitioned away from Symbian. That loss would have been there with Meego/Manhattan, even with Android. New devices don't do anything when most of your market is moving to iphone.
Nokia was ran into ground with decisions made way before Elop. Seems like a good choice anyway. On the other hand Elop is only one letter away from Flop so we'll see.
Sounds good. Nokia under Elop has put out some great - arguably the best - products and has managed to lift the sunken ship he inherited off the bottom of the ocean.
I dont know if you should be putting the man who ran Nokia into the ground in charge of Xbox.
Also, Doesnt this prove what people have been saying all along? That elop was always a Microsoft man and was put there to essentially make Nokia a Microsoft company, with a view to buy them eventually?
Yep. The stuff Nokia was putting out like the 5800 and N97 for example to compete with the iPhone were a joke frankly, and continuing on the Symbian path would've been the wrong way to go. Elop's decision may not have been popular but I feel it was the right one.
Watch the man do interviews and presentations and compare it to the other hacks that Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft march out there for their respective clown shows. He's on point and is great with messaging.
He's exactly what Microsoft could have used for the Xbox One these past few months.
This. My Nokia Lumia 920 is quite honestly the best cell phone I've ever owned and I've owned the first 4 generations of iPhones. I honestly don't think Nokia would even still be in business today if they stayed the course. They were going to take a serious hit, but they managed to survive.
He ran Nokia precisely how Microsoft wanted him to.I dont know if you should be putting the man who ran Nokia into the ground in charge of Xbox
Microsoft + Nokia - $7.17 billion
Google + Motorola - $12.5 billion
tell me, who won ?
the board members need coffee and cookies.Wait so what happens to the woman that was put in charge of xbox like 2 months ago?
Microsoft + Nokia - $7.17 billion
Google + Motorola - $12.5 billion
tell me, who won ?
Google overpaid for Motorola. By a lot. Their patent portfolio isn't worth anything near what Google thought and their phone hardware business hasn't done anything. It was not a good deal.
If anyone can look at the recent trend of restructuring in MS and personnel change and NOT come to the conclusion that it doesn't bode well for the XBone's prospects, I want some of whatever they're smoking.
Mattrick was Canadian too, yknow.I was going to say Yay a Canadian dude, maybe the days of abuse are over! But then I saw your post
Xbox One is unquestionably moving to a more central spot in the company's strategy. The idea that this is a bad thing is just crazy. It will benefit from more resources, more attention, etc.
Faces keep changing at Microsoft's Xbox division. Fortunately Kinect can recognize them to switch players.
Those days appear to be long gone.There needs to be a person with a gaming industry background to lead the xbox side of this division.
Central? On the contrary. It used to have its own division, now it shares a division with recently purchased Nokia and a floundering Windows Phone platform. The head of the Xbox division used to just worry about Xbox and knew a thing or two about games even if it wasn't a lot. Now it's the CEO of a phone company who will mostly be preoccupied with phones while having this annoying video game console to worry about as well.
Windows Phone will fail hard, Devices and Services will be deep in the red and even if XBone is fairly profitable the whole division could get axed as a result due to activist investor pressure.A division that is now moving more to the forefront of the company.
Microsoft is transitioning from a software company to a device and services company. Xbox has been MS' most successful device by far and it drives services they want to push as well, like cloud and media. But think whatever you want.
Nokia was destroing them fine by themselves:
Windows Phone will fail hard, Devices and Services will be deep in the red and even if XBone is fairly profitable the whole division could get axed as a result due to activist investor pressure.
This is a hail mary move that I see backfiring badly.
Nokia was destroing them fine by themselves:
Windows Phone has been, at worst, mildly successful. Not as successful as MS (or Nokia) hoped, but it's in a solid #3 position in the marketplace. It's basically been eating away at RIM's marketshare, actually.
Activist investors wanted MS to spin off (not axe, spin off) Xbox because they believed that it was interfering with the company's core businesses. MS has responded by basically turning Xbox into a core business, so we'll see how it goes. If the One has huge losses and billion-dollar write-offs like Xbox 360, yes investors are going to get upset. Wouldn't you?
OK.
Highly doubt there will be any billion dollor write offs this time around, what with all that venting.
I have always found this funny.
"Elop didn't start the Nokia spiral! He just failed to correct it or slow it at all!"
Congrats I guess?
Nothing says long term commitment to the XBone like lumping it in with a failing phone platform and putting a phone guy in charge of both.Activist investors wanted MS to spin off (not axe, spin off) Xbox because they believed that it was interfering with the company's core businesses. MS has responded by basically turning Xbox into a core business, so we'll see how it goes. If the One has huge losses and billion-dollar write-offs like Xbox 360, yes investors are going to get upset. Wouldn't you?