Colonel Nasty
Member
BP is gonna be a great lead in for IW the way WW will be for JL.
Disney considered AoU a failure? News to me.
Yah I just read it. But at what point is the floor profitable enough for these ensemble films?
With this movie costing rumored $500M dollars, is 1.4B even profitable considering Disney thought AoU was a failure?
BP is gonna be a great lead in for IW the way WW will be for JL.
I think Infinity War will end up closer to Age of Ultron. Civil War was still carrying the Captain America title, was missing some popular Avengers, was coming a year after a somewhat disappointing Avengers sequel, and was more treading water in the MCU (which was part of the problem with Age of Ultron as well). Infinity War avoids some of those, and is delivering on something that has been building for 6 years.
EDIT: Of course, this assumes the film is good.
Can we be sure about black panther? I realize people want it to succeed because of the diversity thing, but it doesn't automatically make it a good movie and we won't truly know until it gets praise like WW or close
Let's say JL earns 1.1B and IW earns 1.4B, but WB claims JL is a success whereas Disney considers IW is a failure. In this case does it matter if IW even outgrossed JL?
Mendelsson is citing an editorial by fuckin' Rich Johnston of Bleeding Cool there.
And even if you wanna give Johnston secondhand credit for being a box-office analyst (and you don't) the headline of Mendelsson's article asks about disappointment, not failure.
Nothing that Marvel's done has even approached the level of failure.
I'll bet that it'll clear 1B overseas or be very close to it. In other words, it'll top AoU WW gross.So about 1.3b ww? 500/800? Seems pretty reasonable.
Neither movie is out yet and you've already moved the goalposts to "but JL will be considered more successful even though it made $300m less." And you're already trying to spin a $1.4b movie as a failure.
So yeah, this isn't a trend. It's a narrative.
Can we be sure about black panther? I realize people want it to succeed because of the diversity thing, but it doesn't automatically make it a good movie and we won't truly know until it gets praise like WW or close
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottm...ailure-in-the-eyes-of-hollywood/#3169e9bc7e3a
It's speculation but Disney never came forward to claim the contrary.
ok you win I lose, I was purposefully pushing some bs fanboy narrative rather than just asking questions.
Can we be sure about black panther?
Can we be sure about black panther? I realize people want it to succeed because of the diversity thing, but it doesn't automatically make it a good movie and we won't truly know until it gets praise like WW or close
Seems like everything goes up except for Avengers. So could the ceiling be going down? Absolutely. But the floor is also going up.
Its a coin toss. If Synder learned his lesson from MOS/BVS and left Whedon with a good movie to polish then I think JL could do better than IW. At the end of the day more people like Batman/Womder Woman and Superman than most of the MCU heroes (on paper).
It's DC's battle to lose. They have all there famous legacy characters while the MCU has been doing well building up there no names.
Here's the only scenario I see IW making more than JL. Both Thor and Black Panther have to great and JL has to be a complete train wreck( which I don't think it will.)
OP you might as well be asking if Ronda Rousey can defeat Mayweather in a fight...
Remember back a few years ago when people were seriously saying that Rousey should be put in the men's pool because she was way too dominant in the women's?
Good times...
I'm still waiting for Disney to respond to my posts on AoU.I don't think Disney really cares to comment on every article supported by nothing more than speculation. Were they supposed to release a statement stating that AoU was not a failure?
I think if Justice League wanted to go for broke, they'd have to drop this weird marketing gimmick of theirs and start putting Superman in the ads instead of pretending his appearance is a big fat mystery you have to go to the movie to get solved for you.
Civil War did this with Spidey to an extent.
WB is really going to surprise the 10 people who didn't watch BvS prior to JL.
WB is really going to surprise the 10 people who didn't watch BvS prior to JL.
You look at that Justice League thread and a lot of the DCEU's fans are dead set on working themselves into a place where it not being Clark is a real possibility.
Like, trying to eye-measure calf sizes & shit.
It's just an excuse to stare longingly at Supes' calves. Don't let it bother you.
I don't think it's necessarily a bad move. In all honesty, as a fan of the DCEU, I know a lot of people really don't dig this depiction of Superman so far so maybe a little bit of the whole "absence makes the heart grow fonder" is in store.I think if Justice League wanted to go for broke, they'd have to drop this weird marketing gimmick of theirs and start putting Superman in the ads instead of pretending his appearance is a big fat mystery you have to go to the movie to get solved for you.
Civil War did this with Spidey to an extent.
Supes is definitely the one showing up at the end, but I'm not so sure about the hologram. The caps flickers at one point and where the boot ends looks a lot more skin toned than whatever weird shade of blue it could possibly be. Supergirl would be a neat tease if only since the League is such a sausage fest right now.You look at that Justice League thread and a lot of the DCEU's fans are dead set on working themselves into a place where it not being Clark is a real possibility.
Like, trying to eye-measure calf sizes & shit.