Of course, the big question with any version of Skyrim is how it holds up after dozens if not hundreds of hours when you've collected every fork in the kingdom and built a collection in your house.
its nonsense to compare it to X1/PS4, then excuse it for being worst in every way when docked, and basically excuse the technical drawbacks by saying well atleast its mobile.
It should be viewed as a portable game console and that's, because it gets a pass on things the X1/PS4 would get hammered on.
So in summary its the worst version, but its mobile.... if only the PSP got this special treatment when it was released.
its nonsense to compare it to X1/PS4, then excuse it for being worst in every way when docked, and basically excuse the technical drawbacks by saying well atleast its mobile.
It should be viewed as a portable game console and that's, because it gets a pass on things the X1/PS4 would get hammered on.
So in summary its the worst version, but its mobile.... if only the PSP got this special treatment when it was released.
If you go physical do you need to download something like for doom ?
Went digital actually. 40$ on the SA shop. Too goodロキー;253026549 said:All you gotta download is a small day one patch for video capture support.
its nonsense to compare it to X1/PS4, then excuse it for being worst in every way when docked, and basically excuse the technical drawbacks by saying well atleast its mobile.
It should be viewed as a portable game console and that's, because it gets a pass on things the X1/PS4 would get hammered on.
So in summary its the worst version, but its mobile.... if only the PSP got this special treatment when it was released.
If nfs was native resolution on vita, I would have played it there more than any version I owned
I don't understand why you can't make a comment without "butthurt" garbage being thrown around. The console versions of games lose to PC on DF all the time and they almost always recommend the PC version but because the Switch has a portable aspect everything bad about it is absolved because of mobile limitations even though most people probably use it as a home console.lol the butthurt.
Literally every DF compares the PS4 and X1 to the PC, and they 'get a pass' for being a cheap box that connect to a TV.
I don't understand why you can't make a comment without "butthurt" garbage being thrown around.
its nonsense to compare it to X1/PS4, then excuse it for being worst in every way when docked, and basically excuse the technical drawbacks by saying well atleast its mobile.
It should be viewed as a portable game console and that's, because it gets a pass on things the X1/PS4 would get hammered on.
They never said this was the worst version. It's the worst of the two between PS4 and Switch, but - again - obviously. (Worst version was on PS3, in any case.)So in summary its the worst version, but its mobile
.... if only the PSP got this special treatment when it was released.
LMAOThe Switch is amazing, Nintendo did excellent work with the hardware.
Removing volumetric lighting is a bit odd to me as it's everywhere in Mario Odyssey. But good to here the game runs well and stays at 900p in docked mode.
LMAO
The Switch is amazing, Nintendo did excellent work with the hardware.
Im confused by the praise. This is a port of a six year old game, should we expect the Switch to run a game this old?
Im confused by the praise. This is a port of a six year old game, should we expect the Switch to run a game this old?
Remember how it ran and looked six years ago on consoles?
Developers have done an excellent job considering the limitations of the hardware.
I have a feeling this will bomb hard though and i feel will sell less than Doom on Switch. Devs are going start wondering if its worth it (unless it is really easy and cheap to port).
its nonsense to compare it to X1/PS4, then excuse it for being worst in every way when docked, and basically excuse the technical drawbacks by saying well atleast its mobile.
It should be viewed as a portable game console and that's, because it gets a pass on things the X1/PS4 would get hammered on.
So in summary its the worst version, but its mobile.... if only the PSP got this special treatment when it was released.
I don't remember anybody complaining about PSP or Vita games looking bad compared to console versions running on better hardware.
The fact is that be it 2005 with the PSP, or 2017 with the Switch, games on mobile devices have always looked worse than their console counterparts, but that doesn't mean they don't look good in their own right.
I was impressed when I first played Killzone Mercenaries on the Vita despite having played better looking FPS games on the PS3 because it looked great for handheld.
Similarly, I'm impressed by seeing Skyrim running on the Switch despite playing a much, much better looking version on the PC with mods.
Why? Because it's on a handheld device, drawing a fraction of the power, with much worse specs and despite that, it still looks good.
Not a bad port, certainly better than Bethesda's Doom port but I suppose that's expected due to the age of the game.
It's be interesting to see how the machine copes with Wolfenstein.