-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Official "Real-Time with Bill Maher" Thread
- Thread starter Flying_Phoenix
- Start date
Mortrialus
Banned
jaekwon15 said:
I was challenging your statement.
jaekwon15 said:
I provided you with a clear example of a difference between them, that you refuse to acknowledge.
dead souls
Member
lexi said:
Agreed. I've done my fair share of criticizing Maher in this thread, but to equate him with Limbaugh is laughable.
SketchTheArtist
Member
Instigator said:
Sorry if I'm late on this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZbzs5BwBLA
After I watched that video, I completely lost all interest I had in Maher. ''You can criticize anything, but don't you dare touch Israel''! You can even see Maher stop right in his track when his guest questioned the US attention had on Israel. It's like his brain shut down. He couldn't understand that someone else didn't have a hard-on when talking about Israel.
Kai Dracon
Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
Bill Mahr is an asshole comic who can't hide the fact that he feels nothing but scorn for people who don't operate within his intellectual sphere, and refuses to make a genuine effort to understand their point of view. However, he respects factuality.
Rush Limbaugh is an asshole comic, and fat white entitled racist pig, who buys entirely into the mentality of the privileged manipulating the plebes for "the greater good, and to assure our destined ascendancy." He lies, distorts, dips below even the asshole level in insulting and mocking virtually anyone, and supports a sociopolitical machine that aims to subvert human progress in the name of profit and the rule of other fat white men.
Both men are dicks, both are fundamentally unlikable, but in the final analysis quite different in terms of what their attitudes are predicated on, their motivations, and their ultimate aims.
Bill Mahr is using his gig to raise awareness of hypocrisy, like a lot of comics. He's just a jerk about it, and hits below the belt at the wrong times, and falls into skirting argumentative fallacies or simplifications because he believes the other side is inherently wrong and he doesn't really have to worry if he's right.
Limbaugh is a troglodyte from the past who is a kinpin in the campaign to deceive and manipulate the ignorant for his and his fellows' personal profit, and to burn the world as long as it keeps their cigars lit. He doesn't actually care who is right or wrong, and sees such questions as the self indulgence of academia. All the matters is the unassailable might of money and power to keep the "right" people, his people, in charge.
Rush Limbaugh is an asshole comic, and fat white entitled racist pig, who buys entirely into the mentality of the privileged manipulating the plebes for "the greater good, and to assure our destined ascendancy." He lies, distorts, dips below even the asshole level in insulting and mocking virtually anyone, and supports a sociopolitical machine that aims to subvert human progress in the name of profit and the rule of other fat white men.
Both men are dicks, both are fundamentally unlikable, but in the final analysis quite different in terms of what their attitudes are predicated on, their motivations, and their ultimate aims.
Bill Mahr is using his gig to raise awareness of hypocrisy, like a lot of comics. He's just a jerk about it, and hits below the belt at the wrong times, and falls into skirting argumentative fallacies or simplifications because he believes the other side is inherently wrong and he doesn't really have to worry if he's right.
Limbaugh is a troglodyte from the past who is a kinpin in the campaign to deceive and manipulate the ignorant for his and his fellows' personal profit, and to burn the world as long as it keeps their cigars lit. He doesn't actually care who is right or wrong, and sees such questions as the self indulgence of academia. All the matters is the unassailable might of money and power to keep the "right" people, his people, in charge.
I don't think maher is as pro israel as he used to be. He had the (jewish) director of a pro palestinian movie on a couple weeks ago and Bill didn't seem to defend israel at all.
Also, everyone has a bias. People who pretend not to are called journalists, which neither Bill or Rush are. Bill isn't trying to be a news man, he's trying to be a comedian on an entertainment show. He says what he thinks is true, whether it is or not is irrelevant. Rush just says whatever he thinks will enrage his fan base enough to keep listening and buy more sleep number beds.
Also, everyone has a bias. People who pretend not to are called journalists, which neither Bill or Rush are. Bill isn't trying to be a news man, he's trying to be a comedian on an entertainment show. He says what he thinks is true, whether it is or not is irrelevant. Rush just says whatever he thinks will enrage his fan base enough to keep listening and buy more sleep number beds.
forknknife
Banned
Oblivion said:
omg so good
please, more!
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
pj said:
I've been watching this show for almost a few months now and have been browsing many old clips and I don't understand the wave of hate. Yes he gets too stubborn at times and yes a few of his viewpoints are quite bothersome (some of his comments on Muslim-Americans). But I think treating him as if he was some light Fox News commentator is a bit hypebolic. He is a man who makes some great points but tends to get smelly once in a while due to wallowing in his own shit. He has also stated multiple times that he isn't a journalist, not does he thing what he does is super significant. He states that he's just a political commentator that tries to give his opinions by making people laugh. A modern jester as you will.
Y2Kev said:
I think its to make his show "less bias". The show is clearly very left and it is only saved from being completely liberal thanks to Maher's stances on Muslims. I imagine it would be pretty hard finding some quality right-wing people in that show due to the fact that there are less level headed ones than the left (well left and right by this country's standards) and few of them want to go on a show where they have to go up against 4 left leaning individuals.
lexi said:
Veidt said:
Mortrialus said:
Why are do you fall for and feed such a mediocre troll?
jaekwon15 said:
What's with GAFs shitty trolls lately? Where's Trent Strong or jett to give us some quality trolling? Hell I'll even take Marleyman at this point.
shadowsdarknes
Member
Partisan pricks like him are the last thing this country needs in this political climate.
I'm not excusing anyone else on the other side of the aisle.
I'm not excusing anyone else on the other side of the aisle.
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Maher is libertarian.
shadowsdarknes
Member
You can even catch Sean Hannity bashing Republicans. He continuously says that he's a registered conservative, not Republican.winter said:
The stuff I've heard Maher say about Republicans is about as bad as what I've heard Hannity say about Democrats.
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
jaekwon15 said:
He said that if you are racist, you will probably lean toward the republican party, which is a water is wet comment.
ElectricThunder
Member
Definitely one of the better eps but good lord what in the hell is taking so long for this week's overtime video to show up on the site? Usually it is there every Saturday morning like clockwork.
I too tired especially easily of most of the Republican guests this season...though the Tea Party people are the worst unless one of them just really goes for it. Though it was last season I think, PJ O'Rourke had about the worst appearance I can remember despite prior ones being nowhere near as grating.
He needs more eclectic characters that represent off the rails viewpoints instead of the usual 2 camps of late.
I too tired especially easily of most of the Republican guests this season...though the Tea Party people are the worst unless one of them just really goes for it. Though it was last season I think, PJ O'Rourke had about the worst appearance I can remember despite prior ones being nowhere near as grating.
He needs more eclectic characters that represent off the rails viewpoints instead of the usual 2 camps of late.
Mortrialus
Banned
jaekwon15 said:
Still ignoring me, huh? How absolutely cowardly and pathetic of you.
nincompoop
Banned
lol, you're never going to find the episode because he never actually said what you said he said. just like a typical right winger, you're making shit up to support your losing argument and hoping nobody calls you out on it.jaekwon15 said:
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
ElectricThunder said:
Its up now.
EDIT - Wait not it isn't. It says "Over Time Has Ended".
dsp
Member
jaekwon15 said:
So how does "if you're racist, you're probably republican" translate into "all racism and homophobia comes from (and can only be found in) the Republican Party"?
What he said shouldn't even be controversial. It's just true. The republican party has a long history of opposing civil rights and fighting against social programs that benefit minorities. Even the racist democrats (dixiecrats) took refuge in the republican party because their views on social issues were accepted there.
Night_Trekker
Member
Flying_Phoenix said:
Eh... if you're white and have racist views about non-whites, perhaps so. The definition of "racism" encompasses more than that.
winter said:
I know this is a thread full of people proud to call themselves extreme leftists (well, that's PoliGAF, isn't it?), but please be intellectually honest, if you can, and recognize that opposing a social program does not necessarily mean that you oppose it because it happens to benefit many people who are non-white.
It would also be helpful to recognize that the Republican party of today, and people who describe themselves as Repbulicans or as conservatives--these things do not necessarily have any connection to the viewpoints of different people from another time who also defined themselves as "Republicans".
I know this is a real "us versus them" buzzkill, but not everyone on GAF is that blindly partisan, right? Someone please confirm that for me.
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Night_Trekker said:
Ture, but its obvious that narrow definition is what he meant.
Night_Trekker said:
What the hell are you talking about?
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Oblivion said:
Incredible.
Mortrialus
Banned
jaekwon15 said:
Lets go by this point by point, because you seem to not be following.
One page 2 you posted this.
jaekwon15 said:
Now, this statement is inherently flawed. Bill Maher and Rush Limbaugh are different people, there is naturally going to be many differences between them, not just one. Real life isn't a binary "X good. X Bad." type of thing. We aren't dealing with vanilla ice scream recipes here, where the only difference might be the increase or decrease of a particular ingredient. Since there isn't going to be just one key difference, the only way to reinterpret your poorly worded post is; I don't see any difference between Bill Maher and Rush Limbaugh.
I then posted a clear example of a difference. Rush Limbaugh is consistently unfunny. This isn't even a partisan issue, or an offense issue. The guy just isn't a humor guy. Bill Maher is consistently a more funny person. As I have provided you with a clear example of a difference, I demand that you concede the point rather than cowardly ignoring me as you have been doing.
Meus Renaissance
Member
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Meus Renaissance said:
Holy shit!
Though it is true to the point. A lot of Maher's jokes are repeats and tend to be super simplistic.
Like Palin and Boehner jokes.
That being said I'm surprised Maher didn't confront him.
NintendoGal
Member
Flying_Phoenix said:
Like hell he is. He's a freaking neo-con.
Death Dealer
Member
Y2Kev said:
She was on an MSNBC talk show and someone was asking her about some outrageous birther comment a GOP politician made, and she replied by saying everyone says crazy things once in a while, and tried to brush it aside by bringing up the fact that Dennis Kucinich claimed he once saw a UFO.
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
On now, but DirecTV viewers get free HBO for the weekend.
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Wow a really good episode.
That being said, stating that 60% of Mississippi Republicans being against inter-racial marriage, when in reality that was only for people 60 and up was a bit low. Like Fox News low.
No new one on next week.
That being said, stating that 60% of Mississippi Republicans being against inter-racial marriage, when in reality that was only for people 60 and up was a bit low. Like Fox News low.
No new one on next week.
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Agnostic said:
By standard world politics he is libertarian and describes himself as such.
He stated that in the 90's he use to be a strict libertarian but the country moved so to the right that he may not be considered such anymore. In other words he didn't change, but the American parties did.
Just saw the most recent episode.
The opening interview was fairly weak. Can't believe Maher didn't follow up when Deval Patrick said "[Obama] ended one war and is trying to end another." Maher addressed it slightly but decided to let it go, even after Patrick clearly equivocated on the timeframe for when the war would end. Overall I found that Maher was much more passive in this interview than he typically conducts himself.
The panel was very good, with the exception of Breitbart. I'm not sure what the point of having him on was, since the conversation inevitably revolved around his scandals. And I personally find the guy repulsive and fraudulent. John Waters was amazing though, I had no idea he was so funny. I would have liked to hear more from Laura Flanders and the other guy (forgot his name, but he seemed very reasonable).
The opening interview was fairly weak. Can't believe Maher didn't follow up when Deval Patrick said "[Obama] ended one war and is trying to end another." Maher addressed it slightly but decided to let it go, even after Patrick clearly equivocated on the timeframe for when the war would end. Overall I found that Maher was much more passive in this interview than he typically conducts himself.
The panel was very good, with the exception of Breitbart. I'm not sure what the point of having him on was, since the conversation inevitably revolved around his scandals. And I personally find the guy repulsive and fraudulent. John Waters was amazing though, I had no idea he was so funny. I would have liked to hear more from Laura Flanders and the other guy (forgot his name, but he seemed very reasonable).
It seems that there's some prior agreement with Maher and Breitbart where, if Breitbart comes on his show, Maher's not supposed to bring up Breitbart's scandals. Kinda shitty, really. At least he didn't call him a journalist like he did last time he was on at least.
Pretty enjoyable episode, though I think he spent too much time on the wedding bullshit in the opening monologue and not enough on the birth certificate.
New rules was pretty good. This was the first time I've ever seen him mention the expansion of Obama's executive powers.
Pretty enjoyable episode, though I think he spent too much time on the wedding bullshit in the opening monologue and not enough on the birth certificate.
New rules was pretty good. This was the first time I've ever seen him mention the expansion of Obama's executive powers.
firehawk12
Subete no aware
The woman was insufferable. "Let's have them dig a tunnel to get troops out of Afghanistan". What the fuck does that even mean?
dead souls
Member
Juanadams said:
I'd imagine it's hard not to be a buzzkill when you're forced to sit next to a piece of fucking trash like Breitbart. I'll never understand why Bill keeps having him on the show.