rmatheso
Member
So is your arrogance.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
DF: Shadow of War: Early Xbox One X vs PS4 Pro Graphics Comparison + Frame-Rate test
- Thread starter Theorry
- Start date
So is your arrogance.
Hippopuncher12
Member
You're probably right about the 2 year thing, and I was more using that as an extreme longest time in between. I do feel with how they are spaced now with the Pro coming out a year before x1x that it will probably stay at least that year apart. Who knows obviously, and this could end up going 100 different ways, but that is just what I am anticipating happens.
You could probably do similar with a $900 machine with a framerate advantage, but yeah. So the secret sauce is here is really the cooling system? Without it they'd be dealing with Pro's size and limitations I think.
Nah. A $1500 PC can run pretty much all games at 4K without any tweaks at far higher settings. Just put in a 1080 TI and a Ryzen 5 with 16 GB RAM and a 500 GB ssd.
Oh ok
Duchess O'Death
Member
You think you need a $2000 PC to run 4K? lol!
EtherMagic
Member
I think some of you people are forgetting what one generation looks like compared to another.
Here is a side by side pic of Battlefield Hardline on Xbox One compared to Xbox 360.
https://flic.kr/p/Zxnyrm
Ground textures/poly count is the real only difference in the 360 version compared to Xbox One version. Not only do the ground textures (all textures in gerneral) look greatly improved in Shadow of War on One X, the lighting is greatly improved aswel and also a nice bump in resolution!
So exactly, the images i referred to are not far off my original statement that them 2 pics can easilly be interpreted as one gerneration ahead.
Hahaha ok bud.
RichiRamjag
Member
Its spacenut. You either get used to Xbox one x is a beast in every thread or you ignore him. Hes harmless enough though.
Yeah, seriously, the difference is insane in pretty much all of the shots on the DF written review:
Ooh. That pic does a good job detailing the differences. I think the texture deal is going to be the norm going forward in addition to the resolution benefits.
He isn't even talking about a $1500 computer but rather a $2000 one.
No.
VincentMatts
Member
I just hope the hardware is reliable. All this fancy cooling system talk scares me.
Dead.gif
EtherMagic
Member
I mean there are certainly noticeable improvements at times like the ground textures in the comparison in the article. But high ground textures are not always that poor and ultra textures are not always crisp.
I mean these are with ultra textures
Bits N Pieces
Member
Well some people think GTS is a generation ahead of FM7 and the difference here in this game is more prevalent, so.....
I kid I kid I kid, lol
VincentMatts
Member
Why do you need validation from other people to try and prove that the Xbox One X is better exactly?
It's impressive that the XOX achieves all of this for $500. Stop trying to turn this into a platform wars thread.
One more, this time with distant background objects:
The difference is staggering.
Difference in distant stuff is more down to resolution and DoF than texture quality.
CassidyIzABeast
Member
GTS is a ghost of it's former self and Forza 7 is all but boxed up.
HAHAHAHA get it?!?!?!
Forza Horizon is where it is at!
rmatheso
Member
Like you just did?
RichiRamjag
Member
Sounds like you were spot on, the difference is definitely a bit bigger than I would have expected.
He did?
I don't think I ever responding saying that PC was better or a better value. I just said that you're ignorant if you think that it costs >$2000 to achieve ultra 4K @ locked 30fps in this game lol.
Stop thread derailing.
Xander51
Member
You just made my day.
GTR R35_Supra RZ
Banned
The salt is so tasty in this thread.
EtherMagic
Member
Wow indeed
Yeah, seriously, the difference is insane in pretty much all of the shots on the DF written review:
Not saying it doesn't look better, but that PS4 screenshot is cropped in way closer
Edit: no it's not that's weird. It's not just texture quality, it must be different levels of LOD or something
GodlyTwins
Member
Really excited to play this! This just reinforces my decision of buying multiplats for Xbox again and just buying Playstation exclusives. My consoles' roles have yet again switched.
That screenshot isnt intended to show texture improvements, it is to show the increased LOD geometry
ToxicPhantom
Member
Looks like my PS4 Pro dropped a dooker and ran off hiding after watching that DF video.
Seganomics
Member
Nope
GrassGate 3.0 will be a given.
And in a couple of years they'll be changing again...
Insane Metal
Member
Damn, the difference is bigger than I expected 
Yeah, seriously, the difference is insane in pretty much all of the shots on the DF written review:
That's a penis.
We know you're excited you already made it clear on page 2 with this exact type of post.
Hopefully from now on all title will show the same kind, or even larger difference. I'd be annoyed if my games on my Pro looked like it does on a regular Xbox one so it's good that Monolith took the advantage it had with the platform. Hopefully the vast majority will follow suit.
rmatheso
Member
Fair enough on the price.
My point was that you probably have to throw more money at a PC system to match this performance on the Xbox. Yes, consoles end up less powerful over time as a PC users can constantly change out parts and always have the best performance. I think Sony and Microsoft rather you just swap out the whole console.
You should be a comedian.
It depends on the game. Games like Prey had huge issues running on console compared to similar PC specs. On the other side, Batman Arkham Knight was a legit disaster on PC and was missing graphical features that were present on PC. Depends on how much time the dev is willing to spend/cut and where the bottlenecks are.