Lone_Prodigy
Member
#9
Can't edit.
Can't edit.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Just Mafia |OT| Sometimes You Don't Need A Reason to Lynch Your Friends
- Thread starter CrimsonFist
- Start date
Blargonaut
Banned
Formidable, alors comme votre premier mousquetaire, Karkador tu as mon epee!
#d'art
weemadarthur
Member
He has your pointy stick?
If I couldn't find someone I thought to be scum, I'd consider voting No Lynch, but that hasn't ever happened to me so far, that I recall.
Blargonaut
Banned
Blargonaut
Banned
Lead on with no leads, mechanized out the machine this pencil clicks and who needs ink when you don't got an eraser, yeah?
But why do you believe me to be Scum, then?
Dusk Soldier
Member
You must really want my opinion. Anything in particular you want to ask?
So we gave them the iniciative? For how long we should be doing that?
They can also hide with the group of No Lynch voters.
We are going to hit town during the game. We are even going to hit PR during the course of the game. It's the nature of the game. We shouldn't be afraid of voting.
That could happen even with a No Lynch vote. The opinions are split so it may not be an easy day end.
We can still be blind starting day 2. Again, how long do we keep waiting before we start acting?
Why Kitsune over Neck?
Do you plan to stop posting when you reach your tenth post?
Blargonaut
Banned
"Oh Fat, comment peux-tu tire moi... si tu adores moi!"
fin?
fin?
kitsunelaine
Banned
Ah, there we go! A reason that makes sense. Well played. Let me join you.
Vote: Zubz
Blargonaut
Banned
If I were yucky after a deathless Day 1, I'd make it a deathless Night too, just to siphon the collective stamina.
#plotting
#plotting
Blargonaut
Banned
Lone_Prodigy
Member
#10
We made it.
We made it.
not really
Blargonaut
Banned
hey_monkey
Banned
We do #lowbarmondays around my neck of the woods but Friday works too, I guess.
On that note, No Lynch is inherently unpopular with the mafia
Yeah, made a mistake sorry.
Initially i did not want to have you on that list since your posts had at least some substance. I then realized naw man add him back.
Posted.
And then realized i did not even cut you off to begin with lol
But Sure, give me your impressions on the game.
weemadarthur
Member
You agreed to oblige so you are now obligated.
Name me your nemeses.
Do not mislead the noobs, once misled, they become mistrustful.
Of course i understand that it is predicated on existing data.
This info is findable in my previous posts, tho spread out.
You were my number 2 choice, based on your gambit.
It was time to move my vote.
I will figure out my number 1 choice after work.
Somebody had already voted the chicken. I dressed the naked noob in red.
NeckToChicken
Unconfirmed Member
Re: my intelligence, let's not get too crazy here.
The only electroswing I know that says enough lacks lyrics, so either my response is akin to yodeling or I cheat and say "Something's OFF, Soup's on, baby".
Which is to say I would be fine with Zubz as a target, as the no lynch plan is tearing this family apart. But...
This is the problem. If Zubz *has* bumbled a gambit, then nailing him for it gives scum a decent place to hide if he gains a large vote majority. Two or three votes in a sea of eleven would be easy to fit.
hey_monkey
Banned
Same. Absent anything else and with him having given it up with plenty of discussion time remaining, I'm not reading him as particularly scummy.
My gambit is only bumbled if I'm killed. It's not as good as it was at first, but I'm still in it.
I do agree that we shouldn't dogpile on anyone, though. Which Isaac did on my vote for Kark, & now Kitsune's doing on me. There was little deliberation in both cases other than a "me too;" they're both worthwhile targets, but Imm holding onto my prod vote for now.
I do agree that we shouldn't dogpile on anyone, though. Which Isaac did on my vote for Kark, & now Kitsune's doing on me. There was little deliberation in both cases other than a "me too;" they're both worthwhile targets, but Imm holding onto my prod vote for now.
Well if he's not it, and he's the biggest lead we have today, then why not join the No Lunch side
NeckToChicken
Unconfirmed Member
Hah, that's true. There are enough dissenting voices to your lynch to back that up.
We still don't get out of day 1 without some sort of vote. I'm as hesitant to vote as you are, but I guess it's fitting for me to be a bit chicken? I'll spit some totally baseless suspicions for courage.
Lone_Prodigy's numbered responses are neat, and you missed #4. Lost your fourth?
rac is a bit terse, and self-described as such. Not damning, Just Frustrating.
acohrs occupies a weird memory hole for me, even despite the push on Zubz. Sneaky beaky like.
Is this just because the Kark side looks just as juicy?
I gotta say, I thenk these chicken yolks are eggscellent! But true... Myself, Kark, & No Lunch are in the lead, but I don't feel confident pushing any of those picks.
What's juicy about lynching me at this point?
You, myself, & No Kill are all tied.
A tie at 2 votes isn't much juice
But I see that you're looking at this as "who can we get a vote on", not "what makes the most sense"
A tie is effectively a No Kill; I'm not letting you have that moral victory.
What do you mean?
It's a way's off, but ties at the end of the day are effectively a No Kill. A tie with No Kill as a contender means we get a No Kill regardless.
I'm also tied. Why are you omitting me?
... Because I absolutely forgot. Whoops!
You both seem Town, though. Scum-Serving No Kill votes aside.
melonrabbit
Member
Ah, there we go! A reason that makes sense. Well played. Let me join you.
Vote: Zubz
Honestly, you are giving me whiplash. If you weren't new people would be voting for you based on this behavior of vote jumping.
And not giving (much) reasoning towards your actions.
hey_monkey
Banned
Bumbled if you die, huh? That's odd phrasing.
hypest intro
friday night, lazy reread of the thread while sleepy is not making any gears turn, so bed time!
kitsunelaine
Banned
Not liking the gambit isn't enough reason?
melonrabbit
Member
No. Because it comes across as bandwagoning.
kitsunelaine
Banned
Well, here's the thing: Wee provided me with an understanding behind their choices, which I felt sufficient. After that, I switched to the next person in the line whom was doing something strange that I didn't quite understand and thus seemed suspicious.
weemadarthur
Member
Yeah.
Saying "this guy looked suspicious because XYZ" makes sense, and nobody would bug you if you said it.....well not much.
Saying "yah Wee i will follow you" is just weird. Especially since from my perspective, I'm just parking my vote on a dude who already gave up his gambit. I don't interfere in those, but I do roll my eyes until the people give it up. I could have unvoted, but well...i wanted to vote out autocorrect.
Karkador, it seems you're sticking to the NL idea. Do you see...any reads? Pro or con? Anywhere? You have had ZERO words that were nt about NL for the whole day.