Yea my university did too. I had no idea that was a thing until a few years ago.Ubisoft has it's own ISP? oO
How would onlive games be any improvement over just the games you could download and play on the PS3?
What did you study?
Social Sci...I left after one year
I think it has a lot of potential for PS3/Vita/PS4/PS Certified tablets & phones (maybe PC too):How would onlive games be any improvement over just the games you could download and play on the PS3?
Smh. People seriously need to give up on the idea of having access to PC games. You will be able to access games on the service that are also on PS3.
The goal of GRID is to bring the promise of "console quality" gaming to every device a user has. The term "console quality" is kind of important here as NVIDIA is trying desperately to not upset all the PC gamers that purchase high-margin GeForce products. The goal of GRID is pretty simple though and should be seen as an evolution of the online streaming gaming that we have covered in the past–like OnLive. Being able to play high quality games on your TV, your computer, your tablet or even your phone without the need for high-performance and power hungry graphics processors through streaming services is what many believe the future of gaming is all about
"NVIDIA today announced a new technology partnership with Gaikai, an on-demand gaming company that competes with OnLive, to bring GeForce GRID to the cloud gaming ecosystem. GRID aims to increase both the visual quality and user experience of cloud gaming by decreasing latencies involved in the process — the biggest hindrance to acceptance for consumers.
Maybe I'm late on this, but what's the point of this? OnLive was a cool concept because I could theoretically play games that my computer could not play. Why would I want to stream a PS3 game that I can already have or buy? I'm probably missing something.
Because it can be used for more than just PS3 games that you would buy, you could play a demo for a game without having to download the gigabytes of files first or I guess rent a game.
Then theres the chances that it can be used for PS1/PS2/PSP games for the PS3/Vita so they wouldn't need to emulate the games on the console itself solving a lot of the problems that come with Backwards Compatibility, especially when moving to new platforms.
I see. That would indeed be cool.
Maybe I'm late on this, but what's the point of this? OnLive was a cool concept because I could theoretically play games that my computer could not play. Why would I want to stream a PS3 game that I can already have or buy? I'm probably missing something.
Those 0ms pings are errors unless the speedtest is being hosted on his pc. If you do a traceroute, hop 1 is usually your router or modem and it averages about 1ms.0ms ping. That means it less than 0.5ms, WOW.
That's mb per second, not MB per sec. He was doing ~60MB per sec.You were probably bottlenecked by the source too. Theoretically, it looks like you could download Diablo 3 in less than 20 seconds.
Do you just stop in at Verizon and request it?Get yourself the new Actiontec Fios "n" router. I think its the "i" revision.
An idea completely out of left field: what if it's a streaming service for playing PS2 games on the PS3? Crazy idea (and 99.99% sure I'm wrong), but an idea none the less!
How exactly will Sony make money from this?
Wouldn't it hurt them since they make their money from retail royalties?
It's not that crazy, since it's been suggested many times. Some of us are hoping for a Netflix-style deal where you can stream whatever PS1/PS2 games that are available for a subscription fee.
Are there any PS2 games on PSN? I thought current PS3 (or Vita) couldn't play PS2 games directly- this is a potential solution to that. PS2 library get.Who's to say the selection of ps1/ps2 games would be any different than what's currently on PSN?
OTOH, at least it would allow the Vita to play ps1 games, lol.
Simple, it's exclusive to PS+ users.
Are there any PS2 games on PSN?
Who's to say the selection of ps1/ps2 games would be any different than what's currently on PSN?
OTOH, at least it would allow the Vita to play ps1 games, lol.
The HD remakes you mean?Yeah, like around ten or so.
No, actual PS2 games. They have their own section under games, check it out.The HD remakes you mean?
Don't know yet. Might be PS2 games for PS3/Vita, might be PS3 games for Vitas (or PS4, if it's not BC). Might be PC games. Might be some combination of the above.So I don't understand.
Do you Stream PS3 games or PC games?
It probably would violate exclusivity agreements. Depends on how things are worded, and if Sony/Gaikai want to play around with semantics, like trying to say the games are being played on a PC with windows, it just happens the monitor and controller are 100 miles away.Okay, let me explain. Let's say The Witcher 2 was playable. Wouldn't that violate the exclusivity agreements?
i just tried 2 demos, HORRIBLE lag. It should be illegal to stream games to people like me with a 7mb connection.
I don't think anyone is expecting that, but if it is some kind of loophole that would be incredible and make this one hell of an E3.Okay, let me explain. Let's say The Witcher 2 was playable. Wouldn't that violate the exclusivity agreements?
Who else thinks the cloud deal will be more focused on the Vita rather than PS3?
It would pretty much completely solve the no gaemz problem the vita is facing and would be a strong attempt at saving the platform from doom.
It could actually end up being a pretty impressive service on that platform. Imagine playing Arkham City or TW2 on Vita. Any issues that might exist with subpar visuals and such on ps3 wouldn't be as big of a problem on vita either.
What exclusivity agreements? CDP chose to do a 360 version of the game. There was no biding contract with MS or something like that.Okay, let me explain. Let's say The Witcher 2 was playable. Wouldn't that violate the exclusivity agreements?