AlteredBeast
Fork 'em, Sparky!
Fucking cynical people in here. Let's just give up on the world already.
What about repentant bigots?You have freedom of association.
It's his choice.
Personally, I think life is too short to waste my time with unrepentant bigots.
On what basis do you reduce the man's efforts to "hanging out with the oppressor?"I meh at, hanging out with the oppressor doesn't impress me. Now folks like Tim Wise, that is somebody i will sing the praises till the end of time.
I meh at, hanging out with the oppressor doesn't impress me. Now folks like Tim Wise, that is somebody i will sing the praises till the end of time.
Do you not know what the KKK is?
It was started by Confederates mad they lose the war to keep black people enslaved. They done hoods like cowards and continued to terrorize black people for over a century. It was started by evil, to do evil, and continue to do evil. If you belong to it you are evil.
Fucking cynical people in here. Let's just give up on the world already.
Fucking cynical people in here. Let's just give up on the world already.
I'm fully aware of what the KKK is. And none of the people alive in that organization today were alive when it was formed, so none of that actually matters. Your logic is the same bullshit that tells us to fear anyone wearing a hijab because they might bomb us, it's the grossest kind of irony that you think it's fine to not try and fix problems and to unrepentently hate another individual that you don't know at all, based purely on affiliations (religious, racial, organizational, whatever) without knowing a single thing about their individual actions or motivations in life.
I'm fully aware of what the KKK is. And none of the people alive in that organization today were alive when it was formed, so none of that actually matters. Your logic is the same bullshit that tells us to fear anyone wearing a hijab because they might bomb us, it's the grossest kind of irony that you think it's fine to not try and fix problems and to unrepentently hate another individual that you don't know at all, based purely on affiliations (religious, racial, organizational, whatever) without knowing a single thing about their individual actions or motivations in life.
This is an extremely intellectually bereft argument. Like, impressively so.
You are doing credit to the KKK they don't deserve their only reason for existing is to inflict pain on minorities. What other organizations in the world do that? And considered valid
Zebra doesn't change it spots, the same hate that keeps it going , same hate that killed these little girls
and still claiming lives
I'm fully aware of what the KKK is. And none of the people alive in that organization today were alive when it was formed, so none of that actually matters. Your logic is the same bullshit that tells us to fear anyone wearing a hijab because they might bomb us, it's the grossest kind of irony that you think it's fine to not try and fix problems and to unrepentently hate another individual that you don't know at all, based purely on affiliations (religious, racial, organizational, whatever) without knowing a single thing about their individual actions or motivations in life.
Show me the guy that bombed a church with 4 kids in it, BY ALL MEANS go shoot him in the head in the street, I couldn't give less of a fuck, but for every 1 of those there are 100 little kids that grew up in an environment that didn't know any better, not unlike little kids growing up in projects and having to work corners or whatever else. You don't solve problems by burying your head in the sand and dehumanizing everyone from 'the other side' - that's how you start wars.
I would ask you to rethink your argument, but I'm sure you don't care.
Fucking cynical people in here. Let's just give up on the world already.
White Supremacist Lives Matter huh?Do you have something to say about it? Or are you just going to fling vocabulary at me and expect it to mean something in and of itself?
I don't give a fuck about the organization, it's made up of PEOPLE. Saying "Oh those people don't deserve consideration or talking to or an attempt to communicate" is literally the same thing racist fucks do to black people and other minorities. EXACTLY the same thing. What do you hope to accomplish by that? I don't give a rats ass if you personally ever talk to one, but to spew hatred at someone else for doing it is fucking laughable man.
I care, but so far the 3 people quoting me have just said passive aggressively insulting things in response instead of actual discourse. Bring some and I'll have a discussion again.
Do you have something to say about it? Or are you just going to fling vocabulary at me and expect it to mean something in and of itself?
You weren't born in the same environment with the same influences as them to lead them towards joining an organization such as this and neither was I.White Supremacist Lives Matter huh?
These people choose to belong to a organization that exists to harm minorities, as long as they willingly continued to associate themselves with that organization. Fuck them and they are not worth considering.
Where did i spew hatred at this man?
You weren't born in the same environment with the same influences as them to lead them towards joining an organization such as this.
It's no different to me than what leads black youth towards joining gangs
Nor is it something that most people would be able to do successfully. It takes a certain temperament and patience. It's partly why I find the man remarkable.A lot of people here understand that the guy is doing good work, but it's not necessarily the best way to combat racism. Having to sit down and explain why racism is a bad thing to someone when you are being oppressed is silly, and the onus should not be on minorities to do so. Many people on GAF have said we are willing to have the discussion, but racists have to show up to the table first.
This isn't his intention in the least, because I'm pretty sure the guy understands this methodology doesn't work as a whole nor will it work perfectly every time (it's just his personal way of doing things), but it's very easy for someone to flip this and say "SEE, WHY DONT YOU BLACKS JUST TALK TO THEM".
You weren't born in the same environment with the same influences as them to lead them towards joining an organization such as this and neither was I.
It's no different to me than what leads black youth towards joining gangs.
Nor is it something that most people would be able to do successfully. It takes a certain temperament and patience. It's partly why I find the man remarkable.
Man, why do you keep tryout no to equate things to make your argument. Pretty much all the comparisons that you say are no different actually ARE rather different. It messes up your argument completely.You weren't born in the same environment with the same influences as them to lead them towards joining an organization such as this and neither was I.
It's no different to me than what leads black youth towards joining gangs.
You weren't born in the same environment with the same influences as them to lead them towards joining an organization such as this and neither was I.
It's no different to me than what leads black youth towards joining gangs.
What this guy does is great, but that really doesn't mean that it's a black person's responsibility to befriend Klan members.
A lot of people here understand that the guy is doing good work, but it's not necessarily the best way to combat racism. Having to sit down and explain why racism is a bad thing to someone when you are being oppressed is silly, and the onus should not be on minorities to do so. Many people on GAF have said we are willing to have the discussion, but racists have to show up to the table first.
This isn't his intention in the least, because I'm pretty sure the guy understands this methodology doesn't work as a whole nor will it work perfectly every time (it's just his personal way of doing things), but it's very easy for someone to flip this and say "SEE, WHY DONT YOU BLACKS JUST TALK TO THEM".
If it is no different to you, then you are not that versed in gang culture. Watch Banging in little Rock to give you a beginning to understanding of what a gang can mean to a youth.
Ignorance, tribalism, environments, and specific societal influences that plague their group and not others.
Man, why do you keep tryout no to equate things to make your argument. Pretty much all the comparisons that you say are no different actually ARE rather different. It messes up your argument completely.
It sounds like Daryl thinks about this sort of thing in a way similar to me. I get a lot of shit on GAF for it too. Don't think I've been called a coon for it yet though.
I don't think this is the expectation - no more than I think it's expected that someone builds houses for the poor, or reaches out to the disadvantaged, or works to rehabilitate criminals - but I'm glad there are people out there who want to do it. It's the sort of beautiful 'Christ like' idealization that I think everyone begrudgingly respects. A desire to make the would better and to see the good in even the most deplorable.
Just because someone can misunderstand a message doesn't mean it doesn't have a point.
It's 'on' both sides to be able to sit down and talk. If you can't do that, you can't expect the other to either. His point is that people that are so uneducated about a topic aren't going to seek to educate themselves, so it can help to reach out to them first. It's not your responsibility or job to do so, but it certainly doesn't hurt. What's the worst that happens? They ignore it. And you carry on. If you don't want to do it, someone like him will, and that's nothing but commendable.
It's easy to have a conversation about this stuff (as easy as conversations on race relations and bias can be anyway) with someone that is already 'on your side', but those aren't the people that need significant convincing. Antagonizing people on the other side only leads to more problems, just like with anything else in life. It takes both sides to come to the table to have a discussion, and it's hypocritical to say "Well, they should be the ones to do it first" if you're not willing to extend an olive branch even when they haven't. If you care about actually fixing problems, sometimes you have to suck it up and do something you don't want to, is my point. If your response to that is "No, THEY should suck it up" then you don't actually care about fixing it in the first place, just about staying mad.
Like, nobody is denying that this is a terrible organization founded by pretty terrible people that have done some terrible fucking things, but it's also an organization comprised today of virtually entirely folks that grew up and were raised in an atmosphere that wouldn't have them question the logic of this shit in the first place. In many ways, people that can't see that have the same sort of situation: If you're raised to fear white people or police or whatever else, you don't question that the KKK is truly evil. They think the same of you. The truth is, those THOUGHTS about the others ide are the problem, not the people, certainly not the majority of the people anyway. I don't know about you, but when I see a little kid in a fucking white hood, my first reaction isn't "Oh, fuck that kid I hope he dies" just like when I see a kid holding a gun in the projects I don't think "Fuck that kid I hope he dies" - no, I hope that we can change the fucking situation so that doesn't have to happen. But you can't do that without addressing actual hard issues like adults.
100%!It sounds like Daryl thinks about this sort of thing in a way similar to me. I get a lot of shit on GAF for it too. Don't think I've been called a coon for it yet though.
I don't think this is the expectation - no more than I think it's expected that someone builds houses for the poor, or reaches out to the disadvantaged, or works to rehabilitate criminals - but I'm glad there are people out there who want to do it. It's the sort of beautiful 'Christ like' idealization that I think everyone begrudgingly respects. A desire to make the would better and to see the good in even the most deplorable.
Surely you understand why minorities get tired of defending their existence to "conversations" that ultimately is just for the oppressor to feel better
A family outside of a family, protection, etc.If it is no different to you, then you are not that versed in gang culture. Watch Banging in little Rock to give you a beginning to understanding of what a gang can mean to a youth.
By this logic, literally every person on the planet is a terrorist. Every religion has people that have done horrible things, ever race has people that have done horrible things, I don't believe in unequivocally condemning individuals that haven't done horrible things just because groups (that they probably grew up into rather than seriously considered the ramifications of joining as a cognizant adult) they belong to do horrible things.
You're saying a blood or a crip could never be rehabilitated into a normal citizen because of that affiliation, and I believe that's just as bullshit. It doesn't mean I forgive the person that actually murdered 5 other people or who burned down a church, it means the vast majority who belong to those organizations haven't actually done any of that in the first place.
People can keep murdering each other, but that only grows the hatred, what this guy is doing is lessening it - yeah it deosn't work on everyone, maybe even most people, but it isn't making anything worse for them and is making things better between the ones it works with. The logic of "WE CANT HAVE PEACE" is the same logic that makes supremecists dismiss BLM. You're saying the same shit.
Cool I guess. But fuck the people that think this should be the standard
I care, but so far the 3 people quoting me have just said passive aggressively insulting things in response instead of actual discourse. Bring some and I'll have a discussion again.
Dude is the textbook definition of a coon.
He spits in the face of EVERY person, with blacker faces than his, terrorized and murdered by KKK thugs.
Just because someone can misunderstand a message doesn't mean it doesn't have a point.
It's 'on' both sides to be able to sit down and talk. If you can't do that, you can't expect the other to either. His point is that people that are so uneducated about a topic aren't going to seek to educate themselves, so it can help to reach out to them first. It's not your responsibility or job to do so, but it certainly doesn't hurt. What's the worst that happens? They ignore it. And you carry on. If you don't want to do it, someone like him will, and that's nothing but commendable.
It's easy to have a conversation about this stuff (as easy as conversations on race relations and bias can be anyway) with someone that is already 'on your side', but those aren't the people that need significant convincing. Antagonizing people on the other side only leads to more problems, just like with anything else in life. It takes both sides to come to the table to have a discussion, and it's hypocritical to say "Well, they should be the ones to do it first" if you're not willing to extend an olive branch even when they haven't. If you care about actually fixing problems, sometimes you have to suck it up and do something you don't want to, is my point. If your response to that is "No, THEY should suck it up" then you don't actually care about fixing it in the first place, just about staying mad.
Like, nobody is denying that this is a terrible organization founded by pretty terrible people that have done some terrible fucking things, but it's also an organization comprised today of virtually entirely folks that grew up and were raised in an atmosphere that wouldn't have them question the logic of this shit in the first place. In many ways, people that can't see that have the same sort of situation: If you're raised to fear white people or police or whatever else, you don't question that the KKK is truly evil. They think the same of you. The truth is, those THOUGHTS about the others ide are the problem, not the people, certainly not the majority of the people anyway. I don't know about you, but when I see a little kid in a fucking white hood, my first reaction isn't "Oh, fuck that kid I hope he dies" just like when I see a kid holding a gun in the projects I don't think "Fuck that kid I hope he dies" - no, I hope that we can change the fucking situation so that doesn't have to happen. But you can't do that without addressing actual hard issues like adults.
And what do you think the community and family environment of a white youth means to them? You can't be so dense as to truly think that black kids in gang environments are just trying to get by and being influenced by their surroundings, but white kids in hicksville USA in the south are totally fine and absolutely understand their biases and everything else.
It's all the same shit - environments that foster fucked up situations.
Your point is the worst kind of false equivalence argument. The environment of the oppressor is not equivalent to the environment of the oppressed, period. It is on white supremacists to change, it is not on others to change them.
Do you really think it's just for "The Oppressor" to feel better? You keep referring to a group of people as that, because you can't fucking stand to believe that someone other than you can be human. It's LITERALLY the same disgusting attitude that lead to the situation here in the first place.
If you don't think the end result of "Maybe we won't be so oppressed" is for your own benefit, then you're not remotely interested in achieving that goal in the first place.
Do you really think it's just for "The Oppressor" to feel better? You keep referring to a group of people as that, because you can't fucking stand to believe that someone other than you can be human. It's LITERALLY the same disgusting attitude that lead to the situation here in the first place.
If you don't think the end result of "Maybe we won't be so oppressed" is for your own benefit, then you're not remotely interested in achieving that goal in the first place.
.
Do you have something to say about it? Or are you just going to fling vocabulary at me and expect it to mean something in and of itself?
I don't give a fuck about the organization, it's made up of PEOPLE. Saying "Oh those people don't deserve consideration or talking to or an attempt to communicate" is literally the same thing racist fucks do to black people and other minorities. EXACTLY the same thing. What do you hope to accomplish by that? I don't give a rats ass if you personally ever talk to one, but to spew hatred at someone else for doing it is fucking laughable man.
I agree with everything you said, the best way to curb ignorance is with education. However, I don't think its fair to expect black people to befriend racists and try to change them. That's a huge undertaking that most people would find incredibly difficult to do.Just because someone can misunderstand a message doesn't mean it doesn't have a point.
It's 'on' both sides to be able to sit down and talk. If you can't do that, you can't expect the other to either. His point is that people that are so uneducated about a topic aren't going to seek to educate themselves, so it can help to reach out to them first. It's not your responsibility or job to do so, but it certainly doesn't hurt. What's the worst that happens? They ignore it. And you carry on. If you don't want to do it, someone like him will, and that's nothing but commendable.
It's easy to have a conversation about this stuff (as easy as conversations on race relations and bias can be anyway) with someone that is already 'on your side', but those aren't the people that need significant convincing. Antagonizing people on the other side only leads to more problems, just like with anything else in life. It takes both sides to come to the table to have a discussion, and it's hypocritical to say "Well, they should be the ones to do it first" if you're not willing to extend an olive branch even when they haven't. If you care about actually fixing problems, sometimes you have to suck it up and do something you don't want to, is my point. If your response to that is "No, THEY should suck it up" then you don't actually care about fixing it in the first place, just about staying mad.
Like, nobody is denying that this is a terrible organization founded by pretty terrible people that have done some terrible fucking things, but it's also an organization comprised today of virtually entirely folks that grew up and were raised in an atmosphere that wouldn't have them question the logic of this shit in the first place. In many ways, people that can't see that have the same sort of situation: If you're raised to fear white people or police or whatever else, you don't question that the KKK is truly evil. They think the same of you. The truth is, those THOUGHTS about the others ide are the problem, not the people, certainly not the majority of the people anyway. I don't know about you, but when I see a little kid in a fucking white hood, my first reaction isn't "Oh, fuck that kid I hope he dies" just like when I see a kid holding a gun in the projects I don't think "Fuck that kid I hope he dies" - no, I hope that we can change the fucking situation so that doesn't have to happen. But you can't do that without addressing actual hard issues like adults.
What I don't understand is why so many people who are generally apathetic about racism in general get indignant when we say we'd rather not spend time and energy sitting down trying to befriend racists
Is there anything in this great that posts to that?What I don't understand is why so many people who are generally apathetic about racism in general get indignant when we say we'd rather not spend time and energy sitting down trying to befriend racists
I think some of what you're saying is very agreeable to me - however I don't think you're really considering the comparisons you're making. The sort of 'both sides' language you are employing is doubling down on the 'you have the kkk in one corner, and you have the gangsters in the other! Both sides!' perception that comes out of a lot of these discussions.
It sounds like the core of your message is, it's commendable to sit down with the damnable and try to have them see the err of their ways, and that's where I really agree with you. However, I think comparing the plight of inner city black youth and the challenges and struggles they face, and yes the negatives and the violence placed on their shoulders by their environments to the plight of children of racists is not a productive comparison, to say the least.
I agree that people who scoff, shake their head at, or even speak ill of this man are disagreeable - but I think with you admiring this man, and with me admiring this man, maybe we can ask ourselves how he'd talk to people who he felt were being disagreeable? Basically... I like a lot of what you're saying, but I don't think I like a lot of how you're saying it.
I guess you can say things any way you want, and you have that right absolutely, and maybe I'm wrong with my characterization of your posts, but I really think that you have an opportunity to win more hearts and minds if you are more considerate about how you say what you say.
Or maybe I'm just tone policing or something. I just hope that my sincerity comes through.
I agree with everything you said, the best way to curb ignorance is with education. However, I don't think its fair to expect black people to befriend racists and try to change them. That's a huge undertaking that most people would find incredibly difficult to do.
It's not the same fucking attitude, because one "side" hate us and kill us for no reason, and we want it to stop. It's not on us to prove ourselves that we're okay to the KKK. They can just not fucking hate us.
Hey you do you. I don't fault anyone for not wanting to talk to someone that hates them for their very existence. But I do find it sad that people in this thread are shaming him for trying to do some good in an admittedly unorthodox way.