I think most have been negative about the project when they found out some of the crowd funding went to buying mansions and ferraris.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/ga...hris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
What? Who did, and when?
I think most have been negative about the project when they found out some of the crowd funding went to buying mansions and ferraris.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/ga...hris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
What? Who did, and when?
I think most have been negative about the project when they found out some of the crowd funding went to buying mansions and ferraris.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/ga...hris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
That was proven to not be true.
Link ?
That was proven to not be true.
Link ?
That was a lie and the Escapist retracted that story. They were mislead by Derek Smart an his cronies.
Might I point out the necessity of positive evidence to prove a claim on the side of a claimant.
Well, here we have that claim :
Multiple sources from within the company stated that the Pacific Palisades mansion that Chris Roberts shares with Sandi Gardiner is being paid for with funds from the company, along with the couples personal vehicles and personal vacations, Escapists Lizzy Finnegan wrote.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/gaming/2015/10/02/82184/chris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
Where is the claim debunking that ?
Well, here we have that claim :
”Multiple sources from within the company stated that the Pacific Palisades mansion that Chris Roberts shares with Sandi Gardiner is being paid for with funds from the company, along with the couple's personal vehicles and personal vacations," Escapist's Lizzy Finnegan wrote.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/gaming/2015/10/02/82184/chris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
Where is the claim debunking that ?
Well, here we have that claim :
Multiple sources from within the company stated that the Pacific Palisades mansion that Chris Roberts shares with Sandi Gardiner is being paid for with funds from the company, along with the couples personal vehicles and personal vacations, Escapists Lizzy Finnegan wrote.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/gaming/2015/10/02/82184/chris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
Where is the claim debunking that ?
Well, here we have that claim :
Multiple sources from within the company stated that the Pacific Palisades mansion that Chris Roberts shares with Sandi Gardiner is being paid for with funds from the company, along with the couples personal vehicles and personal vacations, Escapists Lizzy Finnegan wrote.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/gaming/2015/10/02/82184/chris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
Where is the claim debunking that ?
Well, here we have that claim :
”Multiple sources from within the company stated that the Pacific Palisades mansion that Chris Roberts shares with Sandi Gardiner is being paid for with funds from the company, along with the couple's personal vehicles and personal vacations," Escapist's Lizzy Finnegan wrote.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/gaming/2015/10/02/82184/chris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
Where is the claim debunking that ?
Where is the claim debunking that ?
Really? Sorry, I must have missed that, wasn't it from employees? That's what they had claimed?
The story is gone now. So that should explain it. Also they provided no evidence from which those sourced claimed existed. Unless you want to say that it was a cover up.
The story is gone now. So that should explain it. Also they provided no evidence from which those sourced claimed existed. Unless you want to say that it was a cover up.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
The claim is quoting a source that no longer exists. Are you really this dumb?
"Anonymous GAF poster says: Krispollis consistently engaged in unlawful sex with animals" Source: 404.
You can't prove it isn't true.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
"The fact that all the evidence I'm basing my claims upon doesn't exist has no bearing on the truthfulness of my claims."
I heard Chris Roberts bought a gold house and a rocket car and his health with the Star Citizen money.
I will not believe otherwise until one of you proves it false!
I mean it can be brought down for multiple reasons. Website changes, ot simply not wanting to pay for a lawsuit (even when you're right). It's no proof either way.
Even without that, there were multiple articles about the troublesome development of Star Citizen, it's not like it was only the Escapist :
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/09/23/inside-the-troubled-development-of-star-citizen
Or was it debunked too (again : link ? ) ?
It's straight up ridiculous when you stop and think about it. If it's not conspiracy theories from unverified sources/Derek Smart that are somehow true no matter what, it's constantly perpetuating the notion that the game doesn't exist in anyway shape or form, despite the orgy of evidence to the contrary."The fact that all the evidence I'm basing my claims upon doesn't exist has no bearing on the truthfulness of my claims."
Looking forward to the overreacting users from the previous threads to read this
I heard Chris Roberts bought a gold house and a rocket car and his health with the Star Citizen money.
I will not believe otherwise until one of you proves it false!
I mean it can be brought down for multiple reasons. Website changes, ot simply not wanting to pay for a lawsuit (even when you're right). It's no proof either way.
Even without that, there were multiple articles about the troublesome development of Star Citizen, it's not like it was only the Escapist :
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/09/23/inside-the-troubled-development-of-star-citizen
Or was it debunked too (again : link ? ) ?
I mean it can be brought down for multiple reasons. Website changes, ot simply not wanting to pay for a lawsuit (even when you're right). It's no proof either way.
Even without that, there were multiple articles about the troublesome development of Star Citizen, it's not like it was only the Escapist :
I mean it can be brought down for multiple reasons. Website changes, ot simply not wanting to pay for a lawsuit (even when you're right). It's no proof either way.
Even without that, there were multiple articles about the troublesome development of Star Citizen, it's not like it was only the Escapist :
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/09/23/inside-the-troubled-development-of-star-citizen
Or was it debunked too (again : link ? ) ?
Looking forward to when, next month, their lack of transparency urges the community to react negatively to some weird shit they're doing and end up having to clarify for the millionth time.
The fact that the story is gone doesn't mean it was false at all.
Not a single section in that Kotaku article says its a scam or that they used the money for "ferraris". Are you now moving goalposts?I mean it can be brought down for multiple reasons. Website changes, ot simply not wanting to pay for a lawsuit (even when you're right). It's no proof either way.
Even without that, there were multiple articles about the troublesome development of Star Citizen, it's not like it was only the Escapist :
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/09/23/inside-the-troubled-development-of-star-citizen
Or was it debunked too (again : link ? ) ?
Looking forward to when, next month, their lack of transparency urges the community to react negatively to some weird shit they're doing and end up having to clarify.
Nope, Chris has a fully functional automated Moon Base, he doesn't think as small as a gold house.
Moving your goalposts now?
You tried to defend the claim that Chris bought houses and sports cars with SC money, so now you are moving over to just the development issues? Which no one really argues dont exist.
Applying for an advance on a tax rebate is totally a sign of financial stability.
You can't be serious? the freaking thing was released par the UK law. People that have a vendetta about SC, jump out on it and blow it out of proportion.
CIG always clarifies. By the way, since the internet community is very knee jerk.
I mean it can be brought down for multiple reasons. Website changes, ot simply not wanting to pay for a lawsuit (even when you're right). It's no proof either way.
Even without that, there were multiple articles about the troublesome development of Star Citizen, it's not like it was only the Escapist :
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/09/23/inside-the-troubled-development-of-star-citizen
Or was it debunked too (again : link ? ) ?
The second article is not only about development issues. It shows bad management on a global level.
Applying for an advance on a tax rebate is totally a sign of financial stability.
I think most have been negative about the project when they found out some of the crowd funding went to buying mansions and ferraris.
https://www.pixeldynamo.com/news/ga...hris-roberts-fire-employees-escapist-article/
I just that posted you numbskull.
"Both sides are just as bad" yet we have people posting blatant lies and conspiracy theories? What is happening this thread is gonna get locked again.
Aren't insults bannable on this site now ? You can debate and stay calm, no need to be that defensive.
You can't be serious? the freaking thing was released par the UK law. People that have a vendetta about SC, jump out on it and blow it out of proportion.
CIG always clarifies. By the way, since the internet community is very knee jerk.